Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- metadata commented in wiki content
+
Nonlinear Parametric Vibration Analysis of Radial Gates
 
+
Siyuan Wu
 
+
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
e-mail: siyuan_wu1992@tongji.edu.cn
<big>'''Nonlinear Parametric Vibration Analysis of Radial Gates'''</big></div>
+
Zhengzhong Wang
 
+
College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
e-mail: wangzz0901@163.com
Siyuan Wu<sup>1</sup>*, Zhengzhong Wang<sup>2</sup>, Huanjun Jiang<sup>1</sup></div>
+
Huanjun Jiang 1
 
+
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
<span id='OLE_LINK1'></span><div id="OLE_LINK2" class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
e-mail: jhj73@tongji.edu.cn
''<sup>1</sup>State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China''</div>
+
1 Corresponding Author: Huanjun Jiang ; phone: (+86)18792599934.
 
+
<div id="OLE_LINK23" class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
''<sup>2</sup>College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China''</div>
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
''* Corresponding Author: Siyuan Wu; phone: (+86)18792599934.''</div>
+
 
+
<span id='OLE_LINK5'></span><span id='OLE_LINK4'></span>
+
-->'''Abstract:''' In this work, based on dynamic characteristics of radial gates, a nonlinear differential equation of motion for the radial gate arm is established. Excitation conditions of principal parametric resonance and subharmonic parametric resonance are obtained by using multi-scale method and numerical method. The parameter analysis shows that: comparing with traditional calculation method of dynamic instability region division, the presented method is more suitable to analysis of parametric vibration for radial gates as considering the end moment, vibration duration and amplitude. The vibration amplitudes of arm increase with the increase of its length and excitation amplitude, as well as the decrease of arm inclination angle. Moreover, the parametric resonance is easier to be excited and its resonance region become wider with the initial end moment increasing. Since the vibration response of the arm is influenced by the nonlinear term in the equation, the damping effect is limited. Thus, energy transfer method (e.g. tuned mass damper) can be adopted to achieve vibration control.
+
 
+
'''Keywords:''' Radial gate; parametric vibration; multi-scale method; parameter analysis
+
 
+
===1. Introduction===
+
 
+
The radial gate is a main regulating structure in hydraulic engineering, and its stability is directly related to the safe operation of reservoir. However, the dynamic instability mechanism of radial gates has not been explained clearly up to now, which causes existing structures which are built without proper anti-vibration design at the time of construction are especially vulnerable. Even if they were designed for anti-vibration performance, their design may not comply with current code [1] and thus may have deficient anti-vibration performance. In recent years, multitudes of engineering practices have shown that the radial gates will produce different degrees of vibration and even cause integral instability failure under the flow-induced vibration [2]. Because of their arm is lightness, slenderness and flexibility render this structure more vulnerable to vibrations and dynamic instabilities when subjected to water loads. Consequently, the dynamic stability of the radial gate arm has become a significant problem needs to be solved in both stage of design and operation [3]. According to the excitations like cavity flow, Carmen vortex, special hydrodynamic load and so on, the vibration patterns of gates can be divided into forced vibration, self-excited vibration and parametric vibration. Among them, the parametric vibration only appears in radial gates. The parametric resonance is much more dangerous than standard forced resonance, because its amplitudes increase exponentially. The problem of parametric vibration arises in many branches of physics and engineering has been studied extensively such as cable structure [4], beam structure [5], plate and shell structures [6] and coupled model [7]. In 1980's, Zhang [8] observed the phenomenon of parametric vibration during gate operation in dynamic water and judged it was one of the important reasons for dynamic instability of arm through engineering failure examples, and proposed a concise analytical calculation method. Subsequently, there are fascinating researches which have been carried out on the division of dynamic instability region [9]. However, the dynamic instability region can be used to determine whether parametric resonance occur or not, but it does not yield the response amplitude at arbitrary time. Usually the radial gate is subjected to flow-induced load for a relatively short period of time, and the arm amplitudes remain fluctuating in a narrow range without infinite magnification trend. Thus, the method of dynamic instability region may not be an accurate criterion for defining dynamic instability without time factor. Nowadays, Zhang and Xie [10] investigated the chaotic behaviors of nonlinear systems in the radial gate arm under certain dynamic loads and proved the necessity to analyze the stability of radial gate with excitation amplitude and duration effects.
+
 
+
In this paper, according to the mechanical characteristics of the radial gate, with full considerations of geometric nonlinear factors caused by bending moment and large displacement at the high head, the nonlinear differential equation of motion for the arm is established. The stability of parametric vibration is given by methods of multi-scale method and numerical method. Moreover, the effects of excitation factors (water head, frequency, time, amplitude) and structural elements (angle, length, damping) on the vibration response of arm are quantitatively analyzed.
+
 
+
===2. Derivation of the nonlinear differential equation of motion for the radial gate arm===
+
 
+
Several basic assumptions are made before establishing the equation of motion for radial gate arms:
+
 
+
(1) The material nonlinearity of the arm is assumed as elastic.
+
 
+
(2) Torsional stiffness and shear stiffness of the arm are not considered.
+
 
+
On the premise of the above assumptions, the analytical model of the in-plane main frame is established in Figure 1.
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image1.png|198px]] </span></div>
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 1.''' A main frame of in-plane radial gates.</span></div>
+
 
+
Recently, Zhang et al. [11] proposed a non-moment design method for the out-of-plane main frame of radial gate, but the in-plane layout scheme without bending moment has not been reported up to now. Hu et al. [12] examined that the effect of initial end bending moment ''M''<sub>0</sub> of in-plane radial gate arm can not be ignored by prototype observation. Thus, according to the relationship between the deflection and the moment of the material:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>EI{w^{{''}}}_0=-M_0</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (1)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
and the arm boundary conditions:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>w_0\left(0\right)=0</math> , <math>w_0\left(L\right)=0</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (2)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
The sag of the arm can be defined as follow:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\eta =w_0=\frac{M_0L}{2EI}x-\frac{M_0x^2}{2EI}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (3)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where ''EI ''represents the flexural rigidity, ''L'' represents the length of the arm.
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
[[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image6.png|600px]] </div>
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 2.''' A vibration model of the radial gate arm.</span></div>
+
 
+
Consider a radial gate arm, as depicted in Figure 2, with the longitudinal ''u''(''x'',''t'') and transverse displacements ''v''(''x'',''t''), earthquake excitation frequency ''ω''<sub>p</sub>, flow-induced excitation frequency ''ω''<sub>d</sub>, earthquake excitation load ''D''<sub>p</sub>, flow excitation load ''D''<sub>d</sub>. The equation of motion for this structure is:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\frac{\partial }{\partial s}\left[\left(T_0+\tau \right)\left(\frac{\mbox{d}\eta }{\mbox{d}s}+\right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. \frac{\mbox{d}v}{\mbox{d}s}\right)\right]\mbox{=}m\frac{{\partial }^2v}{\partial t^2}+</math><math>EI\left(\frac{{\partial }^4\eta }{\partial s_{}^4}+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{{\partial }^4v}{\partial s_{}^4}\right)+</math><math>\mu \frac{\partial v}{\partial t}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (4)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where ''T''<sub>0</sub> is tangential hydrostatic pressure, ''τ'' is additional tangential hydrodynamic pressure, ''s'' is the coordinate by the arc length. ''m'' is the mass per unit length of the arm, ''μ'' is denoting damping coefficient.
+
 
+
According to the geometric deformation and the stress state of the arm model, the results are obtained:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\frac{\tau }{h}=\frac{T_0}{H_0}=\frac{\mbox{d}s}{\mbox{d}x}=</math><math>{\left[1+{\left(\frac{\mbox{d}\eta }{\mbox{d}x}\right)}^2\right]}^{\frac{1}{2}}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (5)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where ''H''<sub>0</sub> and ''h'' represent the axial hydrostatic pressure and the additional axial hydrodynamic pressure, respectively.
+
 
+
By Taylor formula, the equation (5) is expanded at d''η''/d''x''=0:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>{\left[1+{\left(\frac{\mbox{d}\eta }{\mbox{d}x}\right)}^2\right]}^{\frac{1}{2}}=</math><math>1-\frac{1}{2}{\left(\frac{M_0L}{2EI}-\frac{M_0x}{EI}\right)}^2</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (6)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
Substituting of equations (5) and (6) into equation (4), the following equation is obtained:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\left(H_0+h\right)\left[1-\frac{1}{2}{\left(\frac{M_0L}{2EI}-\frac{M_0x}{EI}\right)}^2\right]\left(\frac{\mbox{d}^2\eta }{\mbox{d}s_{}^2}+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{\mbox{d}^2v}{\mbox{d}s_{}^2}\right)\mbox{=}m\frac{{\partial }^2v}{\partial t^2}+</math><math>EI\frac{{\partial }^4v}{\partial s_{}^4}+\mu \frac{\partial v}{\partial t}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (7)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
The length variation of micro-segment d''s''' is assumed as:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\mbox{d}^2{s^{{'}}}_{}={\left(\mbox{d}x+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\mbox{d}x\right)}^2+</math><math>{\left(\mbox{d}\eta +\frac{\partial u}{\partial \eta }\mbox{d}\eta \right)}^2</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (8)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
Neglecting the longitudinal inertia gives:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\epsilon =\frac{\mbox{d}{s^{{'}}}_{}-\mbox{d}s}{\mbox{d}s}\mbox{=}\frac{\partial u}{\partial s}\frac{\mbox{d}x}{\mbox{d}s}+</math><math>\frac{\partial v}{\partial s}\frac{\mbox{d}\eta }{\mbox{d}s}+</math><math>\frac{1}{2}{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial s}\right)}^2</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (9)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
as d''s''≈d''x'', equation (9) can be rewritten:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\epsilon =\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\frac{\mbox{d}\eta }{\mbox{d}x}+</math><math>\frac{1}{2}{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)}^2</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (10)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
The boundary conditions for generalized displacements vector (Figure 2) are:
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<math>v\left(0,t\right)=D_\mbox{p}sin\alpha </math> ,  <math>v\left(L,t\right)=D_\mbox{d}cos\alpha </math> ,  <math>u\left(0,t\right)=-D_\mbox{p}cos\alpha </math> ,  <math>u\left(L,t\right)=D_\mbox{d}cos\alpha </math> </div>
+
 
+
In this study, the first-order mode is dominated. Hence, the displacement ''v''(''x'',''t'') can be expressed as:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>v\left(x,t\right)=\frac{x}{L}D_\mbox{d}cos\alpha +</math><math>\left(1-\frac{x}{L}\right)D_\mbox{p}sin\alpha +V\left(t\right)sin\frac{\pi x}{L}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (11)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where ''V''(''t'') is the displacement amplitude.
+
 
+
When only the flow-induced vibration is considered, supposing ''D''<sub>p</sub>=0, equation (11) can be rewritten as:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>v\left(x,t\right)=\frac{x}{L}D_\mbox{d}cos\alpha +</math><math>V\left(t\right)sin\frac{\pi x}{L}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (12)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
The internal force of the arm can be expressed as:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\left(H_0+h\right)=H_0+\frac{EA}{L}{\int }_0^L\epsilon \mbox{d}x=</math><math>H_0+\frac{EA}{L}\left(u_\mbox{d}\mbox{+}u_\mbox{p}\mbox{+}\frac{2L^2M_0V_\mbox{a}}{{\pi }^3EI}+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{{\pi }^2V_{}^2}{4L}\right)</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (13)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where  <math>u_\mbox{d}=U_\mbox{d}cos\left({\omega }_\mbox{d}t\right)=</math><math>D_\mbox{d}cos\left(\alpha \right)cos\left({\omega }_\mbox{d}t\right)</math> ,  <math>u_\mbox{p}=U_\mbox{p}cos\left({\omega }_\mbox{p}t\right)=</math><math>D_\mbox{p}cos\left(\alpha \right)cos\left({\omega }_\mbox{p}t\right)</math> .
+
 
+
Substituting equations (3), (12) and (13) into equation (7) yields:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image23.png|600px]]
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (14)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
Then, according to the Galerkin method,the equation of motion is obtained as follows:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\ddot{V}+2\xi {\omega }_\mbox{a}\dot{V}+\left[{\omega }_{}^2+\right. </math><math>\left. a\left(u_\mbox{d}+u_\mbox{p}\right)\right]V+</math><math>bV_{}^2+cV_{}^3+d_\mbox{d}u_\mbox{d}+d_\mbox{p}u_\mbox{p}+</math><math>e=0</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (15)
+
|}
+
  
 +
Abstract: In this study, based on the dynamic characteristics of radial gates, a nonlinear differential equation of motion for a radial gate arm is derived. The excitation conditions of both principal and subharmonic parametric resonance cases are obtained by using multi-scale and numerical methods. The parameter analysis reveals the following: In comparison to the analytical calculation method (e.g., Multi-scale) of dynamic instability region division, this method effectively analyzes the parametric vibration of radial gates in terms of the end moment, vibration duration, and amplitude. The vibration amplitudes of the arm increase with an increase in its length and excitation amplitude as well as a decrease in the arm inclined angle. Moreover, the parametric resonance excitation is facilitated, and the resonance region becomes larger with an increase in the initial end moment. Comparing with damping effect, vibration response of the arm is mainly affected by the nonlinear behavior in system. Therefore, the energy transfer method (e.g. Add tuned mass dampers) should be taken into account in vibration control.
 +
Keywords: Radial gate; parametric vibration; multi-scale method; parameter analysis
 +
1.Introduction
 +
A radial gate is a main regulating structure employed in hydraulic engineering, and its stability is directly related to the safe operation of a reservoir. However, the dynamic instability mechanism of radial gates has not been elucidated thus far, and as a result, the existing structures that are constructed without appropriate anti-vibration design are vulnerable. Even if such structures are designed for anti-vibration performance, their design may not comply with current design code [1] and thus may exhibit deficient anti-vibration performance. In recent years, several engineering practices, such as Wachi Dam (1967) in Japan and the Folsom Dam (1995) in the United States, have shown that radial gates will produce different degrees of vibration and even damage structure considerably to flow-induced excitation when the gates were partially opened [2-3]. The lightness, slenderness, and flexibility of the arm render the structure to vibration and dynamic instability easily, when subjected to water loads. Moreover, the increase of water level will reduce the structural frequency, this characteristic indicates that the radial gate should be highly vulnerable under high water head [4]. Consequently, the dynamic stability of the radial gate arm has become a crucial issue with many influence factors that needs to be resolved in both the design and operation stages [5]. According to excitations such as cavity flow, Kármán vortices and special hydrodynamic load, the vibration patterns of the gates can be categorized as follows: forced vibration, self-excited vibration, and parametric vibration. Based on the elongated nature of radial gate arms as mentioned above, among the various types of gates, the parametric vibration only appears in radial gates. The problems of parametric vibration are encountered in many branches of physics and engineering, have been studied extensively, such as in cable structures [6], beam structures [7], plate and shell structures [8], and coupled models of multi-member interaction [9]. In 1980s, Zhang, J.G. [10] observed the phenomenon of parametric vibration during gate operation in dynamic water, considered it as one of the important causes of dynamic instability in the arm through engineering failure examples, and proposed a concise analytical calculation method. Subsequently, there are thought-provoking researches that have been carried out on the division of the dynamic instability region [11]. Although this region can be used to determine whether parametric resonance occurs or not, it does not yield the response amplitude at an arbitrary time. In general, the radial gate is subjected to flow-induced load for a relatively short period of time, and the arm amplitudes continue to fluctuate within a narrow range without the magnification factor tending to infinity. Hence, the method of dynamic instability region may not be an accurate criterion for defining the dynamic instability without considering the time factor. Recently, Zhang, J. and Xie, Z.X. [12] investigated the unstable behavior of nonlinear systems in the radial gate arm under certain dynamic loads and proved the necessity to analyze the stability of radial gate in terms of the excitation amplitude and time duration.
 +
In this study, according to the mechanical characteristics of the radial gate, with by completely considering the geometric nonlinear factors caused by the bending moment and large displacement at the high head, the nonlinear differential equation of motion for an arm is derived. The stability of parametric vibration is obtained using multi-scale and numerical methods. Moreover, the effects of excitation factors (water head, frequency, time, and amplitude) and structural factors (inclined angle, length, and damping) on the vibration response of the arm are quantitatively analyzed.
 +
2.Derivation of the nonlinear differential equation of motion
 +
Three dimensional overview of the radial gate is shown in Figure 1, the gate contains a face plate to retain water, two major crossbeams, four inclined arms with box-sectional area, major vertical beams and minor beams [13]. The anchor of radial gate arm is attached to piers, which can be regard as a semi-rigid connection. In accordance with Chinese design code SL74-2013 [1], the structure can be simplified as an extended beam, both ends constrained by water seal in y direction, and assembled with arms by welding. The water pressure can pass to piers through face plane, main beams and arms, while, the load acting on main beam can be considered as uniform hydrostatic pressure q by equivalent calculation (see Figure 2). Then on the base of these, further analyze the arm vibration under local coordinate, the model as shown in Figure 3, with the length of the arm L, the transverse displacement v(x,t), flow-induced excitation frequency ωd, the tangential hydrostatic force T0= q (Lb + 2c)/ 2, and the additional tangential hydrodynamic force τ. Due to parametric vibration is induced by harmonic load, so τ can be assumed as the function of harmonic displacement of flow excitation Dd = Adcosωdt.
 +
 +
Figure 1. Three dimensional overview of the radial gate. Figure 2. The main frame of in-plane radial gate.
 +
The following basic hypotheses are made before establishing the equation of motion for radial gate arms:
 +
(1)Material properties: based on previous hydraulic experiments on full-scale or model gates, the arm, which are considered homogeneous and isotropic, and always behave elastically under design loads, even fails in a predominantly elastic mode (sway-type failures). For convenience and safety, most study of hydraulic experiments, suppose the whole structure work in elastic state.
 +
(2)Element type: due to the ends of arm are restricted by major crossbeams and piers, respectively, and its length is much larger than dimensions of cross-section, so the arm can be regarded as a Bernoulli-Euler beam, the torsion and shear effect are negligible.
 +
Recently, Zhang, X.C. et al [14] proposed a non-moment design method for eliminating end bending moment of vertical main frame (x-z plane). This method reduces out-of-plane eccentric compression on the arm and improve the overall stability bearing capacity. But the study of in-plane (x-y plane) layout scheme about end bending moment has not been reported thus far, while Hu, M.S. et al. [15] examined that the effect of in-plane initial end bending moment M0 cannot be neglected from prototype observation. According to the above researches, in-plane vibration of arm is discussed in this work. The relation between the deflection and moment can be written as:
 +
                                                                            (1)
 +
where, according to design code (SL74-2013), in order to ensure the safety of the calculation results, the major crossbeam is assumed as a double cantilever beam and M0 = qc2/2.
 +
In order to keep derivations in this study clear, according to the relatively simple boundary conditions without loss of generality (Figure 2), The sag of the arm is expressed as follows:
 +
                                                                      (2)
 +
where EI denotes the flexural rigidity and R, the rotational stiffness of semi-rigid connection.
  
 +
Figure 3. Vibration model of a radial gate arm.
 +
The equation of motion for the arm is as follows:
 +
                                (3)
 +
where s represents the lagrange coordinate by the arc length, m is the mass per unit length of the arm and the damping coefficient μ. When α = 90°, the arm is upright, same as layout of Figure 2.
 +
According to the geometric deformation and stress state of the arm model, the following results are obtained:
 +
                                                        (4)
 +
where H0 and h represent the axial force and additional axial hydrodynamic force, respectively.
 +
By Taylor formula, Equation (5) is expanded at dη/dx = 0:
 +
                                                (5)
 +
According to static force equilibrium equation of radial gate arm:
 +
                                                                  (6)
 +
Substituting Equations (4), (5) and (6) into Equation (3), the following equation is obtained:
 +
                      (7)
 +
The length variation of micro-segment ds' is assumed as follows:
 +
                                                        (8)
 +
where u (x, t) is the longitudinal displacement.
 +
Substituting Equation (8) into Equation (4) and neglecting the quadratic term of longitudinal strain gives the following equation:
 +
                                                (9)
 +
As ds ≈ dx, Equation (9) can be rewritten as follows:
 +
                                                          (10)
 +
The boundary conditions for generalized displacements vector (Figure 2) are written as:
 +
, , , .                                (11)
 +
Satisfying the boundary conditions (11), by separation of variables, the vibration mode of the arm can be expressed as:
 +
                                                            (12)
 +
where V(t) is the displacement amplitude. According to early analysis, Liu, J.L. et al [11] pointed out that, for radial gate arm vibration induced by flow excitation, the first mode is dominated. Hence, We can use the single mode approximation with neglecting modal interaction.
 +
The axial hydrodynamic force of radial gate arm can be expressed as follows:
 +
                                          (13)
 +
where .
 +
Substituting Equations (2), (12), and (13) into Equation (7) yields the following equation:
 +
    (14)
 +
Then, according to the Galerkin method, the equation of motion is obtained as follows:
 +
                                              (15)
 
where
 
where
 
+
, , ,
<math>2\xi {\omega }_\mbox{a}=\frac{\mu }{m}</math> , <math>{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2={\omega }_0^2\left(1+\lambda \right)</math> , <math>{\omega }_0^2=\frac{{\pi }^2H_0}{mL_{}^2}+\frac{EI{\pi }^4}{mL_{}^4}</math> ,
+
,
 
+
,
<math>\theta =\left\{\left[\frac{M_0^2{\pi }^2L}{4E_{}^2I_{}^2}\left(\frac{L}{4}+\right. \right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. \left. \frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{2{\pi }^2}-\right. \right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. \left. E\right)\right]H_0+\frac{4M_0^2AL_{}^3}{EI_{}^2{\pi }^4}\left(\frac{M_0^2L_{}^2}{4E_{}^2I_{}^2}-\right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. 1\right)\right\}/\left(-\frac{mL}{2}\right)</math> ,
+
,
 
+
,
<math>a=\left\{\left[\frac{M_0^2{\pi }^2L}{4E_{}^2I_{}^2}\left(\frac{L}{4}+\right. \right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. \left. \frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{2{\pi }^2}-\right. \right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. \left. E\right)-\frac{{\pi }^2}{2L}\right]H_0+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{4M_0^2AL_{}^3}{E_{}I_{}^2{\pi }^4}\left(\frac{M_0^2L_{}^2}{4E_{}^2I_{}^2}-\right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. 1\right)-EI\frac{{\pi }^4}{2L_{}^3}\right\}\frac{EA}{L}/\left(-\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{mL}{2}\right)</math> ,
+
.
 
+
where ξ is the damping ratio, ω0 corresponds to the first-order natural frequency and λ is the arm parameter of the end moment.
<math>b=\left\{\left[\frac{M_0^2{\pi }^2L}{4E_{}^2I_{}^2}\left(\frac{L}{4}+\right. \right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. \left. \frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{2{\pi }^2}-\right. \right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. \left. E\right)-\frac{{\pi }^2}{2L}\right]H_0+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{4M_0^2AL_{}^3}{EI_{}^2{\pi }^4}\left(\frac{M_0^2L_{}^2}{4E_{}^2I_{}^2}-\right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. 1\right)-\frac{{\pi }^4EI}{2L_{}^3}\right\}\frac{2L_{}^2M_{}A}{{\pi }^3}/\left(-\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{mL}{2}\right)</math> ,
+
In comparison to the classical parametric vibration models [2, 11-12], this model is highly comprehensive and it reflects the characteristics of the parametric vibration of radial gates with greater accuracy.
 
+
3.Stability analysis
<math>c=\left\{\left[\frac{M_0^2{\pi }^2L}{4E_{}^2I_{}^2}\left(\frac{L}{4}+\right. \right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. \left. \frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{2{\pi }^2}-\right. \right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. \left. E\right)-\frac{{\pi }^2}{2L}\right]H_0+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{4M_0^2AL_{}^3}{EI_{}^2{\pi }^4}\left(\frac{M_0^2L_{}^2}{4E_{}^2I_{}^2}-\right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. 1\right)-EI\frac{{\pi }^4}{2L_{}^3}\right\}\frac{EA{\pi }^2}{4L_{}^2}/\left(-\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{mL}{2}\right)</math> ,
+
In the present investigation, as both the stretching of the arm and the flow excitation are small, the nonlinear terms and the parametric excitation terms are smaller than the linear terms. Therefore, the method of multiple scales is applied to Equation (15) to asymptotically describe the slow dynamics of the model [16-17]. To weaken the nonlinear terms, the following substitutions are made:
 
+
, ,                                                 (16)
<math>c_\mbox{d}=\frac{4c_i}{\pi m}sin\left(\frac{\pi x_{\mbox{d}i}}{L}\right)</math> , <math>d_\mbox{d}=\left[\frac{2AM_0}{\pi I}\left(\frac{M_0^2L_{}^2}{8EI_{}^2}-\right. \right. </math><math>\left. \left. 1\right)-m\frac{L}{\pi }v_\mbox{d}^2\right]/\left(-\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{mL}{2}\right)</math> ,
+
where ε is a small bookkeeping parameter. Then, Equation (15) can be rewritten as:
 
+
                                      (17)
<math>e=\left(\frac{M_0^2L_{}^2}{8EI_{}^2}-1\right)\frac{2M_0L}{EI\pi }/\left(-\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{mL}{2}\right)</math> .
+
Supposing the solution to Equation (17) can be expressed as:
 
+
                                      (18)
where ''ξ'' is the damping ratio, ''ω''<sub>0</sub> is the first-order natural frequency, ''λ'' is the arm parameter of the end moment.
+
where T0 = t, T1 = tε, T2 = tε2. Substituting Equation (18) into Equation (17) and letting the coefficients ε, ε2 and ε3 equal zero, the following equations are obtained:
 
+
                                                                          (19)
Compared with the classical parametric vibration models [2, 9-10], this model is more comprehensive and can more accurately reflect the characteristics of the parametric vibration of radial gates.
+
                                            (20)
 
+
    (21)
===3. Stability analysis===
+
The complex solution to Equation (19) can be assumed as:
 
+
                                                          (22)
The multi-scale method will be used to solve the nonlinear equation of motion. Therefore, the following substitutions are made:
+
where  is the complex conjugate of A.
 
+
Substituting Equation (22) into Equation (20), one gets:
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
                        (23)
|-
+
where cc indicates the complex conjugate part. Eliminating the secular terms yields:  
|
+
                                              (24)
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
Substituting Equations (22) and (24) into Equation (21) leads to:
|-
+
          (25)
| <math>{\epsilon }^2\chi =-2\xi {\omega }_\mbox{a}</math> , <math>{\epsilon }^2f_1=-a</math> , <math>{\epsilon }^2f_2=-d</math> ,  <math>{\epsilon }^2f_3=-e</math>
+
Through practical observation [10], when excitation frequency ωd approaches 2 times of  the structure frequency ωa, the parametric resonance may occur. A detuning parameter σ is introduced to quantify the deviation of ωd from 2ωa, and ωd is described by:
|}
+
                                                                    (26)
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (16)
+
Substituting Equation (26) into Equation (25) and eliminating secular terms yields:
|}
+
                      (27)
 
+
Then, by expressing the function A in the polar form as:
 
+
                                                                  (28)
where ''ε'' is a small dimensionless perturbation parameter. Then, equation (15) can be rewritten to:
+
where α(t) and θ(t) are real functions. By substituting this transformation into Equation (27), and separating the resulting real and imaginary parts yield:
 
+
                                                (29)
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
                                  (30)
|-
+
where γ = ε2σT0 - θ. The stationary solution equation αs and γs can be obtained from Equations (29) and (30) by letting . The vibration amplitude can be expressed as:
|
+
                                                    (31)
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
For αs is a real number, from Equation (31), the stability boundary is given by:
|-
+
,                                             (32)
| <math>\ddot{V}+{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2V={\epsilon }^2\chi \dot{V}+</math><math>{\epsilon }^2f_1u_\mbox{e}V-bV_{}^2-cV_{}^3+{\epsilon }^2f_2u_\mbox{e}+</math><math>{\epsilon }^2f_3</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (17)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where ''u''<sub>e</sub> represents excitation load. Suppose that the solution to equation (17) can be expressed as:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>V=\epsilon V_{11}\left(T_0,T_1,T_2\right)+{\epsilon }^2V_{12}\left(T_0,T_1,T_2\right)+</math><math>{\epsilon }^3V_{13}\left(T_0,T_1,T_2\right)</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (18)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where ''T''<sub>0</sub>=''t'', ''T''<sub>1</sub>='''', ''T''<sub>2</sub>=''t''. Substituting equation (18) into equation (17) and equating the coefficients of like powers of ''ε'' result in the following differential equations:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>D_0^2V_{11}+{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2V_{11}=0</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (19)
+
|}
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>D_0^2V_{12}+{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2V_{12}=-2D_0D_1V_{11}-</math><math>bV_{11}^2+f_2Usin\left({\omega }_\mbox{e}t\right)+</math><math>f_3</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (20)
+
|}
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>D_0^2V_{13}+{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2V_{13}=-2D_0D_1V_{12}-</math><math>\left(D_1^2+2D_0D_2\right)V_{11}+\chi D_0V_{11}+f_1Usin\left({\omega }_\mbox{e}t\right)V_{11}-</math><math>2bV_{11}V_{12}-cV_{11}^3</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (21)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
The complex solution to equation (19) can be obtained as:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>V_{11}=A\left(T_1,T_2\right)e^{i{\omega }_\mbox{a}T_0}+</math><math>\overline{A}\left(T_1,T_2\right)e^{-i{\omega }_\mbox{a}T_0}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (22)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where  <math>\overline{A}</math> is the complex conjugate of ''A''.
+
 
+
Substituting equation (22) into equation (20), one gets:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>D_0^2V_{12}+{\omega }_a^2V_{12}=-2i{\omega }_aD_1Ae^{i{\omega }_\mbox{a}T_0}-</math><math>bA^2e^{i2{\omega }_\mbox{a}T_0}+i\frac{f_1}{2}Ue^{i{\omega }_\mbox{e}T_0}+</math><math>bA\overline{A}+\frac{f_3}{2}+cc</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (23)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where ''cc'' indicates the complex conjugate part at the right-hand side of equation (23). Eliminating the secular terms in equation (21) leads to:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>V_{12}=\frac{bA^2}{2{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}e^{i2{\omega }_\mbox{a}T_0}-</math><math>\frac{if_2U}{2\left({\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2\right)}e^{i{\omega }_\mbox{e}T_0}+</math><math>\frac{bA\overline{A}}{{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+\frac{f_3}{2{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+</math><math>cc</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (24)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
Substituting equations (22) and (24) into equation (21) lead to:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\begin{array}{c}
+
D_0^2V_{13}+{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2V_{13}=\left(\chi i{\omega }_\mbox{a}A-2D_2i{\omega }_\mbox{a}A-\frac{8b^2A^2\overline{A}}{3{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}-3cA^2\overline{A}-\frac{bA}{{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}\right)e^{i{\omega }_\mbox{a}T_0}-\left(\frac{2b^2A^3}{3{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+cA^3\right)e^{i3{\omega }_\mbox{a}T_0}\\
+
\begin{array}{ccccc}
+
&  &  &  &
+
\end{array}+\left(\frac{bif_2A}{{\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+\frac{f_1}{2}iA\right)Ue^{i\left({\omega }_\mbox{a}+{\omega }_\mbox{e}\right)T_0}+\left(\frac{bif_2\overline{A}}{{\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+\frac{f_1}{2}i\overline{A}\right)Ue^{i\left({\omega }_\mbox{a}+{\omega }_\mbox{e}\right)T_0}+cc
+
\end{array}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (25)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
Here, the subharmonic parametric resonance, ''ω''<sub>e</sub>=2''ω''<sub>a</sub> is studied. Therefore, one has:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>{\omega }_\mbox{e}=2{\omega }_\mbox{a}+{\epsilon }^2\sigma </math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (26)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
Eliminating secular term in equation (25), the following is obtained:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>-2i{\omega }_\mbox{a}\frac{\partial A}{\partial T_2}+</math><math>\chi i{\omega }_\mbox{a}A-\frac{14b^2A^2\overline{A}}{3{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}-</math><math>3cA^2\overline{A}+\left(\frac{bif_2\overline{A}}{{\omega }^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{f_1}{2}i\overline{A}\right)Ue^{i\sigma T_0}=</math><math>0</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (27)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
Write ''A'' in the exponential function form as follows:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>A=\frac{1}{2}\alpha \left(t\right)e^{i\theta \left(t\right)}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (28)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where ''α''(''t'') and ''θ''(''t'') are real functions. Substituting equation (28) into equation (27) and separating the resulting equation into real and imaginary parts yield:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\dot{\alpha }=\frac{1}{2}\chi \alpha +\left[\frac{bf_2}{2\left({\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2\right)}+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{f_1}{4}\right]U\alpha sin\gamma </math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (29)
+
|}
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\alpha \dot{\gamma }=\sigma \alpha -\frac{7b^2{\alpha }^3}{12{\omega }_\mbox{a}^3}-</math><math>\frac{3c{\alpha }^3}{8{\omega }_\mbox{a}}+\left[\frac{bf_2}{2\left({\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2\right)}+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{f_1}{4}\right]U\alpha sin\gamma </math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (30)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
where ''γ''=ε<sup>2</sup>''σT''<sub>0</sub>-''θ''. The stationary solution equation ''α''<sub>s</sub> and ''γ''<sub>s</sub> can be obtained from equations (29) and (30) by letting <math>\dot{\alpha }=\dot{\gamma }=0</math> . The vibration amplitude can be expressed as:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>{\alpha }_\mbox{s}^2=\frac{2\sigma \pm \sqrt{{\left(\frac{bf_2}{{\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+\frac{f_1}{2}\right)}^2U^2-{\chi }_\mbox{a}^2}}{\frac{7b^2}{6{\omega }_\mbox{a}^3}+\frac{3c}{4{\omega }_\mbox{a}}}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (31)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
For ''α''<sub>s</sub> is a real number, from equation (31), the condition of the structural motion stability can be obtained as follows:
+
 
+
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
|-
+
|
+
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
|-
+
| <math>\vert \sigma \vert \leq \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{{\left(\frac{bf_2}{{\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+\frac{f_1}{2}\right)}^2U^2-{\chi }_\mbox{a}^2}</math> , <math>\left(\frac{bf_2}{{\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{f_1}{2}\right)U>{\chi }_\mbox{a}</math>
+
|}
+
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (32)
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
 
or
 
or
 +
,                                            (33)
 +
From Equations (32) and (33), emerging conditions of subharmonic parametric resonance can be obtained and many parameters like axial force, length of arms, etc. affect the structural motion stability region. It is a kind of way to get the dynamic instability region. But the stable solutions are functions of structural characteristics, which are not including effect of time factor. Therefore, the numerical method is further adopted to analyze.
 +
4.Numerical analysis
 +
In this section, the nonlinear responses of the radial gate arm are investigated. As a example, considering a radial gate arm with box-section, the cross-sectional dimensions are shown in Figure 4. The arm length L = 16 m, mass per unit length m = 386 kg/m, and modulus of elasticity E = 210 GPa.
  
{| class="formulaSCP" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"
+
Figure 4. Arm section (unit: mm).
|-
+
Applying the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method to Equation (15), the radial gate arm subjected to the parametric excitation are investigated and the effects of the excitation and structural factors are evaluated.
|
+
4.1 Effect of water head
{| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
+
According to the Chinese and American codes, the layout of the main beam adopts equivalent load method, and the hydrostatic force H0 is a function of water head. Table 1 summarizes the Chinese super high head radial gates (> 80 m). We first chose the initial disturbance V(0) = 10−4 m, excitation amplitude Ad = 0.01 m, time t = 500 s, damping coefficient μ = 0, and water head H = 0 as a basic case. The Figure 5 shows the influence of water head on the vibration amplitudes, λd denotes the ratio of the external excitation frequency to the natural frequency.
|-
+
Table 1. Super high head radial gates in China.
| <math>\vert \sigma \vert >\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{{\left(\frac{bf_2}{{\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+\frac{f_1}{2}\right)}^2U^2-{\chi }_\mbox{a}^2}</math> ,  <math>\left(\frac{bf_2}{{\omega }_\mbox{e}^2-{\omega }_\mbox{a}^2}+\right. </math><math>\left. \frac{f_1}{2}\right)U>{\chi }_\mbox{a}</math>
+
Engineering Location Size of face plane
|}
+
width-height (m) Water head (m)
| style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (33)
+
1 Xiaowan Lantsang 5.0×7.0 163.00
|}
+
2 Shuibuya Qing River 6.0×7.0 154.00
 
+
3 Xiaolangdi Yalong River 4.8×4.8 140.00
 
+
4 Jinping-I Yalong River 5.0×6.0 133.00
From which one can see that many parameters like axial force, length of arms, etc. affect the structural motion stability region.
+
5 Laxiwa Yellow River 4.0×6.0 132.00
 
+
6 Pubugou Dadu River 6.5×8.0 126.28
===4. Numerical analysis===
+
7 Nuozhadu Lantsang 5.0×8.5 126.00
 
+
8 Tianshengqiao-I Pearl River 6.4×7.5 120.00
Taking a representative radial gate arm for study. The arm has box section, whose cross-sectional dimensions are shown in Figure 3. Arm length ''L''=16m, mass per unit length ''m''=386kg/m, modulus of elasticity ''E''=210GPa.
+
9 Dongjiang Dong Jiang Lake 6.4×7.5 120.00
 
+
10 Longyangxia Yellow River 5.0×7.0 120.00
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
11 Xiluodu Jinsha River 6.0×6.7 105.50
[[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image60.png|156px]] </div>
+
12 Jiangpinghe Loushui River 6.0×6.0 105.14
 
+
13 Longtan Hongshui River 5.0×8.0 90.00
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
14 Dagangshan Dadu River 6.0×6.6 83.00
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 3.''' Arm section (unites: mm).</span></div>
+
15 Goupitan Wujiang River 10.0×9.0 81.00
 
+
In MATLAB, the standard fourth-order Runge-Kutta method is used to solve the numerical solution of equation (15) and the influence of the excitation elements and the structural elements for vibration of the radial gate arm is analyzed.
+
 
+
====4.1 Effects of water head====
+
 
+
When Initial disturbance ''V''(0)=10<sup>-4</sup>m, excitation amplitude ''A''<sub>d</sub>=0.01m, time ''t''=500s, damping coefficient ''μ=''0 and initial water head ''H''=0, the effects of varying water head on vibration amplitude are shown in Figure 4. Where ''λ''<sub>d</sub> denotes the ratio of the external excitation frequency to the natural frequency of the arm. According to the Chinese and American codes, the layout of main beam of radial gate is equal load, and the hydrostatic pressure ''H''<sub>0</sub> is related function of water head. The analysis of water head is shown in Table 1.
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Table 1.''' Statistical table of Chinese high head radial gate.</span></div>
+
 
+
{| style="width: 69%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;"
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Hydropower Station</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Location</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Size (m)</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Head (m)</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">1</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Xiaowan</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Lantsang</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">5.0×7.0</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">163</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">2</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Shuibuya</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Qing River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">6.0×7.0</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">154</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">3</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Jinping I</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Yalong River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">5.0×6.0</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">133</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">4</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Laxiwa</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Yellow River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">4.0×6.0</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">132</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">5</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Pubugou</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Dadu River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">6.5×8.0</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">126.28</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">6</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Tianshengqiao First cascade</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Pearl River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">6.4×7.5</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">120</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">7</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Xiluodu</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Jinsha River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">6.0×6.7</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">105.5</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">8</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Jiangpinghe</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Loushui River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">6.0×6.0</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">105.14</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">9</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Longtan</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Hongshui River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">5.0×8.0</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">90</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">10</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Dagangshan</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Dadu River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">6.0×6.6</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">83</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">11</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Goupitan</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Wujiang River</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">10.0×9.0</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">81</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">12</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Nuozhadu</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Lantsang</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">5.0×8.5</span>
+
|  style="border-top: 2pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">76</span>
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
When the principal parametric resonance occurs, the amplitude of the arm increases with the increase of the water head, and the maximum displacement reaches 0.57m. In the case of subharmonic parametric resonance, the tendency of change is opposite, and the maximum amplitude is 0.18m. Overall, both types of parametric resonance responses change slowly and the axial hydrostatic pressure of the arm can be assumed to be 80m head in later analysis.
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">[[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-picture- 1.svg|600px]] </span></div>
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 4.''' Vibration amplitude-water head curves.</span></div>
+
 
+
====4.2 Effects of excitation frequency ratio and initial end bending moment ====
+
 
+
Figure 5 depicts the relationship between the amplitude and the excitation frequency ratio subjected to the initial end bending moment of different water heads. In figures, at ''H''=0, the peak value of parametric resonance only appears at ''λ''<sub>d</sub>=1 and ''λ''<sub>d</sub>=2. This phenomenon matches the case of Design Code for Steel Gate in Water Resources and Hydropower Projects (SL74-2013) [1]. The Figure 6 shows that when the initial end bending moment is not taken into consideration, the beat vibration phenomenon can be observed, and the beat amplitude value increases over time at the subharmonic parametric resonance. However, take into account intitial end bending moment (Figure 5), the amplitude peak will be shift, and the arm response amplitudes increase with the initial end bending moment level, the resonance region become wider, which makes the parametric resonance more easily excited. The maximum displacements of parametric resonance are 1.44m and 2.2m at dividing point of high head in current code 80m and maximum existing design head 163m (Table 1). Through the above analysis, it is further clarified that the parametric resonance excitation condition mentioned in Chinese code is a special case in the parametric resonance region, which only consider the parametric resonance occur at the near doubled natural frequency. In order to obtain a more accurate response of the arm, the calculation method of instability regions for radial gates should be adopted in this paper.
+
 
+
{| style="width: 100%;"
+
|-
+
|  style="vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image63.png|294px]] </span>
+
|  style="vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image64.png|300px]] </span>
+
|-
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">(a) ''H''<100m</span>
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">(b) ''H''≥100m</span>
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 5.''' Vibration amplitude-excitation frequency ratio curves.</span></div>
+
 
+
{| style="width: 100%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;"
+
|-
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image65.png|600px]] </span>
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image66.png|600px]] </span>
+
|-
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">(a) ''λ''<sub>d</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=1</span>
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">(b) ''λ''<sub>d</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=2</span>
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 6.''' Time history curves of displacement.</span></div>
+
 
+
====4.3 Effects of excitation amplitude====
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image67.png|306px]] </span></div>
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 7.''' Vibration amplitude-excitation amplitude curves.</span></div>
+
 
+
Figure 7 demonstrates the relationship between the displacement and the excitation amplitudes. The diagram shows that when parametric resonance occurs, the displacement response is closely related to the excitation amplitude. The response nonlinearly increases with the increase of excitation amplitude. When the excitation amplitude is less than 0.08m, the subharmonic parametric resonance response is greater than the principal parametric resonance response. While as the excitation amplitude is greater than 0.08m, two kinds of parametric resonance responses are almost equal. When the excitation amplitude is less than 0.01m, the arm swings in a smaller range, which makes it difficult to form destructive vibration. Thus, the response of the arm should be fully considered with the factor of excitation amplitudes.
+
 
+
====4.4 Effects of inclination angle====
+
 
+
<span id='OLE_LINK6'></span>The effect of inclination angle of radial gate arm on vibration amplitude is presented in Figure 8. The amplitude displacement increases significantly at subharmonic parametric resonance with the increase of angle. But, at the parametric resonance, when the angle is less than 45 degrees, the amplitude increases rapidly, and then tends to steady. Thus, the inclination should be reasonably arranged in combination with considering displacement constraint in the design of radial gate.
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
[[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image68.png|300px]] </div>
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 8.''' Vibration amplitude-inclination angle curves.</span></div>
+
 
+
<span id='_GoBack'></span>
+
 
+
====4.5 Effects of arm length and excitation time====
+
 
+
According to the characteristics of traditional radial gate and special planar radial gate as depicted in [13], arm length from 5 to 25m is examined in this paper. The curve of the relationship between the amplitude and length of arm is shown in Figure 9.
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image69.png|288px]] </span></div>
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 9.''' Vibration amplitude-length curves.</span></div>
+
 
+
It can be found that the calculated results are not agreement with the description of the traditional unstable regions partition method. In the past review, with the increase of length, the flexibility and response amplitude of the arm should increase correspondingly. However, the inflection point appears in the Figure 9, this dependence of curve is not linear. Then, the time history analysis at a, b, c, d on both sides of the inflection are given in Figure 10. When the arm length is more than 45m and 20m respectively at ''λ''<sub>d</sub>=1 and ''λ''<sub>d</sub>=2, a longer excitation time is needed to reach peak response. This result proved that the gate may not show strong vibration in the initial stage of local opening operation, while the vibration amplitude will become much stronger over time, until the whole structure reaches integral instability failure. The results also proves that it is not advisable to ignore the time factor in the traditional design.
+
 
+
It can be seen that, from the above analysis, the time factor of local opening should be considered in the initial design stage. Meanwhile, in the stages of completion and operation, the corresponding guidance of local opening range and opening-closing time should be given in detail according to the vibration analysis results in an project. It is more reasonable that the length of radial gate arm is chosen less then 20m in 500s according to the case presented in this article.
+
 
+
{| style="width: 100%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;"
+
|-
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image70.png|600px]] </span>
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image71.png|600px]] </span>
+
|-
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">(a) ''λ''<sub>d</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=1, ''L''=45 (''V''<sub>max</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=0.2291)</span>
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">(b) ''λ''<sub>d</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=1, ''L''=60 (''V''<sub>max</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=0.2427)</span>
+
|-
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image72.png|600px]] </span>
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image73.png|600px]] </span>
+
|-
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">(c) ''λ''<sub>d</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=2, ''L''=10 (''V''<sub>max</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=0.8116)</span>
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">(d) ''λ''<sub>d</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=2, ''L''=20 (''V''<sub>max</sub></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">=0.9604)</span>
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Figure 10. Time history curves of displacement.</span></div>
+
 
+
====4.6 Effects of damping====
+
 
+
{| style="width: 100%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;"
+
|-
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;width: 50%;"|[[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image74.png|300px]]
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;width: 50%;"|[[Image:Draft_Wu_829241308-image75.png|300px]]
+
|-
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|(1) ''λ''<sub>d</sub>=1
+
|  style="text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|(b) ''λ''<sub>d</sub>=2
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 11.''' Vibration amplitude-damping ratio curves.</span></div>
+
 
+
Figure 11 illustrates the relationship between amplitude and damping ratio under different excitation amplitudes. As can be seen from the diagram, amplitudes nonlinearly decrease with the damping ratio increaseing. Furthermore, the amplitude decreases rapidly at ''λ''<sub>d</sub>=1, ''ξ''<0.01, and then tends to steady. The damping decrement at ''λ''<sub>d</sub>=2 is slightly higher than ''λ''<sub>d</sub>=1. As a whole, the damping effect on the vibration control is relatively insensitive. Once the parametric resonance is excited, the resonance amplitudes are mainly affected by the nonlinear term rather than the damping coefficient. Thus, adopting means of energy transfer (such as tuned dampers), the much more significant damping effect will be achieved.
+
 
+
<span id='_Toc24931_WPSOffice_Level2'></span>
+
 
+
===5 Conclusions===
+
 
+
This paper is devoted to nonlinear parametric vibration of radial gates. the nonlinear differential equation of motion for radial gate arm is derived with considering the geometric nonlinear and large displacement. Furthermore, the stability and vibration response of principal parametric resonance and subharmonic parametric resonance are investigated by using multi-scale method and numerical method. At the same time, the above-mentioned methods make up for the defects of the former methods of dividing the dynamic instability zone with not considering effects of response amplitude and time. The results are discussed as follows:
+
 
+
(1) The change of hydrostatic pressure caused by the water head has little effect on the parametric vibration, while the resonance region broaden with increase in the initial bending moment.
+
 
+
(2) The increasing of amplitude response increases both the excitation amplitude and the arm length, moreover, it reduces the inclination angle.
+
 
+
(3) Vibration amplitude will become much stronger over time. Thus, the time factor should be consider in design and operation stages.
+
 
+
(4) The vibration response mainly depends on the coefficient of nonlinear term, while the damping effect is limited. Thus, energy transfer method should be adopted to suppress the vibration.
+
 
+
==Data Availability Statement==
+
 
+
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the summitted article.
+
 
+
==Acknowledgements ==
+
 
+
This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51179164 and 51478354).
+
 
+
==References ==
+
 
+
[1] CMWR (China Ministry of Water Resources). (2013) Design Code for Steel Gate in Water Resources and Hydropower Projects (SL74-2013). China Water & Power Press, Beijing.
+
 
+
[2] Niu, Z.G., Li, T.C. (2008) Research on Dynamic Stability of Steel Radial Gates. In: Earth and Space. Long Beach. pp. 1-8.
+
 
+
[3] Wang, Z.Z., Zhang, X.C., Liu, J.L. (2017) Advances and developing trends in research of large hydraulic steel gates. J. Hydroelectr. Eng., 36: 1-18.
+
 
+
[4] Demsic, M., Uros, M., Lazarevic, A.J., Lazarevic, D. (2019) Resonance regions due to interaction of forced and parametric vibration of a parabolic cable. J. Sound. Vib., 447: 78-104.
+
 
+
[5] Zhang, X., Peng, J., Wang, L. (2014) Parametric resonances in the two-to-one resonant beams on elastic foundation. Nonlinear Dynam., 77: 339-352.
+
 
+
[6] Franzini, G.R., Pesce, C.P., Gonçalves, R.T., Fujarra, A.L.C., Mendes, P. (2018). An experimental investigation on concomitant vortex-induced vibration and axial top-motion excitation with a long flexible cylinder in vertical configuration. Ocean Engineering, 156: 596-612.
+
 
+
[7] Wei, M.H., Lin, K., Jin,L., Zou, D.J. (2016) Nonlinear dynamics of a cable-stayed beam driven by sub-harmonic and principal parametric resonance. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 110: 78-93.
+
  
[8] Zhang, J.G. (1985) Summary on the study of gate vibration in China. Water Power, 11: 38-44.
+
When the principal parametric resonance occurs, the amplitude of the arm increases with the water head, and the maximum displacement reaches 0.57 m. In the case of subharmonic parametric resonance, the change is contrasting, and the maximum amplitude is 0.18 m. Overall, both the types of parametric resonance responses change slowly, so supposes the axial hydrostatic force generated by 80 m water head in further analysis.
  
[9] Liu, J.L., Wang, Z.Z., Fang, X., Fang, H.M. (2011) Dynamic instability mechanism and vibration control of radial gate arms. Appl. Mech. Mater., 50: 309-313.
+
Figure 5. Vibration amplitude–water head curves.
 +
4.2 Effects of excitation frequency ratio and initial end bending moment
 +
Figure 6 depicts the relationship curves plotted between the vibration amplitude and the excitation frequency ratio when subjected to the initial end bending moment of different water heads. As shown in the figure, at H = 0, the peak value of parametric resonance only appears at λd = 1 and λd = 2. This phenomenon conforms to the current design code “Design Code for Steel Gate in Water Resources and Hydropower Projects (SL74-2013)” (2013). Figure 7 shows that when the initial end bending moment is not considered, the beat vibration phenomenon can be observed, and the beat amplitude value increases over time at the subharmonic parametric resonance. However, considering the initial end bending moment (Figure 6), the amplitude peak shifts and the arm response amplitudes increase with the initial end bending moment level and the resonance region become larger, which facilitates parametric resonance excitation. According to the design retaining water height of the gate, 80 m is the critical value between high head gates and super high head gates, and maximum existing design head is 163 m (Table 1). The maximum displacements of parametric resonance are 1.44 m and 2.20 m at water heads of 80 m and 163 m, respectively. Through the above analysis, it is further elucidated that the parametric resonance excitation condition given in Chinese code is a special case in the parametric resonance region, which only considers the parametric resonance occurring at nearly twice the natural frequency. In order to obtain a higher accuracy response of the arm, the proposed calculation method of the instability regions in this study should be adopted.
 +
 +
(a) H < 100 m (b) H ≥ 100 m
 +
Figure 6. Vibration amplitude–excitation frequency ratio curves.
 +
 +
(a) λd = 1 (b) λd = 2
 +
Figure 7. Displacement time–history curves
 +
4.3 Effect of excitation amplitude
  
[10] Zhang, J., Xie, Z.X. (2011) Nonlinear vibration and chaos phenomena of arm structures in radial gate. Water Power, 50: 309-313.
+
Figure 8. Vibration amplitude–excitation amplitude curves.
 +
Figure 8 shows the relationship curve between the displacement and the excitation amplitude. The graph shows that when parametric resonance occurs, the displacement response is closely related to the excitation amplitude. The response increases nonlinearly with an increase in the excitation amplitude. When the excitation amplitude is less than 0.08 m, the subharmonic parametric resonance response is greater than the principal parametric resonance response. On the other hand, when the excitation amplitude is greater than 0.08 m, both the parametric resonance responses are almost equal. When the excitation amplitude is less than 0.01 m, the arm swings in a smaller range, making it difficult to form a destructive vibration. Hence, the response of the arm should be completely considered with respect to the factor of excitation amplitudes.
 +
4.4 Effect of inclined angle
 +
The effect of inclined angle on the vibration amplitude is presented in Figure 9. The amplitude displacement increases significantly at subharmonic parametric resonance with the angle. However, at parametric resonance, when the angle is less than 45 degrees, the amplitude increases rapidly and then remains steady. Hence, the inclined angle should be considered along with the displacement constraint in the design of radial gates.
  
[11] Zhang, X.C., Wang, Z.Z., Sun, D.X. (2018) Research on rational layout of strut arms of tainter gate in vertical frame. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingeniería, 34: 1-6.
+
Figure 9. Vibration amplitude–inclined angle curves.
 +
4.5 Effect of arm length and excitation time
 +
According to the characteristics of conventional radial gate and special planar radial gate, as mentioned in the study by Chen, F.Z. and Yan, G.H. [18], the arm length from 5 to 25 m is examined in this study. The relationship curve is plotted between the amplitude and the length of arm, as shown in Figure 10.
  
[12] Hu, M.S., Yang, Z.Z., Xu, J., Zhang, B. (2015) Modal parameter identification of radial gate based on stochastic subspace method. Water resour. power, 33: 164-167.
+
Figure 10. Vibration amplitude–length curves.
 +
It can be found that the calculated results are not in agreement with the description of the conventional partitioning method for unstable regions In the past review, with an increase in the length of the arm, its flexibility and response amplitude should increase simultaneously. However, the inflection point appears in Figure 10, and a nonlinear curve dependence is noted. Then, the time history analysis at a, b, c, and d on both sides of the inflection are given in Figure 11. When the arm length is greater than 45 m and 20 m at λd = 1 and λd = 2, a longer excitation time is needed to reach the peak response. This result proves that the gate may not show a strong vibration at the initial stage of the local opening operation, while the vibration amplitude will become considerably higher across time until the structure reaches integral instability failure. The results also prove that it is not advisable to ignore the time factor in the conventional design.
 +
From the above analysis, it is noted that the time factor of the local opening should be considered in the initial design stage. Meanwhile, in the stages of completion and operation, the corresponding guidelines of local opening range and opening–closing time should be given in detail according to the vibration analysis results in a project. It is practical to choose the length of radial gate arm to be less then 20 m in 500 s according to the case presented in this exploration.
 +
 +
(a) λd = 1, L = 45 (Vmax = 0.2291) (b) λd = 1, L = 60 (Vmax = 0.2427)
 +
 +
(c) λd = 2, L = 10 (Vmax = 0.8116) (d) λd = 2, L = 20 (Vmax = 0.9604)
 +
Figure 11. Displacement time-history curves
 +
4.6 Effect of damping
 +
 +
(a)λd = 1 (b) λd = 2
 +
Figure 12. Vibration amplitude–damping ratio curves.
 +
Figure 12 illustrates the relationship between amplitude and damping ratio under different excitation amplitudes. As shown in the figure, the amplitude nonlinearly decreases with an increase in the damping ratio. Furthermore, the amplitude decreases rapidly at λd = 1, ξ < 0.01, and then remains steady. The damping decrement at λd = 2 is slightly higher than that at λd = 1. Overall, the damping effect to vibration control is not very obvious, once the parametric resonance excitation is achieved, the resonance amplitudes are significantly affected by the nonlinear term of system rather than the damping coefficient. Hence, when an energy transfer method, such as adding tuned mass dampers, is employed, the vibration suppressed effectiveness is better.
 +
5. Conclusions
 +
This paper presents the nonlinear parametric vibration of radial gates. The nonlinear differential equation of motion for the radial gate arm is derived by considering the geometrically nonlinear. Furthermore, the stability and vibration response of principal and subharmonic parametric resonance cases are investigated by using multi-scale and numerical methods. At the same time, the numerical analysis overcomes the limitations of the former methods, in which the dynamic instability regions are divided without considering the effects of response amplitude and time. The results are discussed as follows:
 +
(1)The change in the hydrostatic force caused by the water head has a negligible effect on the parametric vibration, while the resonance region broadens with an increase in the initial bending moment.
 +
(2)An increase in amplitude response leads to an increase in both the excitation amplitude and arm length and a decrease in the inclined angle.
 +
(3)The vibration amplitude becomes significantly higher with time. Therefore, the time factor should be considered in the design and operation stages.
 +
(4)Comparing with damping effect, the vibration response mainly depends on the nonlinear behavior. Thus, the energy transfer method should be adopted to suppress the vibration.
  
[13] Chen, F.Z., Yan, G.H. (2015) The key technology research on Chinese special type sluice. Hohai University Press, Nanjing.
+
Acknowledgements
 +
This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51179164 and 51478354).
 +
References
 +
[1] CMWR (China Ministry of Water Resources). (2013) Design Code for Steel Gate in Water Resources and Hydropower Projects (SL74-2013). China Water & Power Press, Beijing.
 +
[2] Niu, Z.G., Li, T.C. (2008) Research on Dynamic Stability of Steel Radial Gates. In: Earth and Space. Long Beach. pp. 1-8.
 +
[3] Oh, L.S., Hoje, S., Won, K.J. (2018) Flow-induced vibration of a radial gate at various opening heights. Eng. Appl. Comp. Fluid, 12: 567-583.
 +
[4] Brusewicz, K. Sterpejkowicz-Wersocki, W. Jankowski, R. (2017) Modal analysis of a steel radial gate exposed to different water levels. Arch. Hydro Eng. Environ. Mech., 64: 37-47.
 +
[5] Wang, Z.Z., Zhang, X.C., Liu, J.L. (2017) Advances and developing trends in research of large hydraulic steel gates. J. Hydroelectr. Eng., 36: 1-18.
 +
[6] Demsic, M., Uros, M., Lazarevic, A.J., Lazarevic, D. (2019) Resonance regions due to interaction of forced and parametric vibration of a parabolic cable. J. Sound. Vib., 447: 78-104.
 +
[7] Zhang, X., Peng, J., Wang, L. (2014) Parametric resonances in the two-to-one resonant beams on elastic foundation. Nonlinear Dynam., 77: 339-352.
 +
[8] Franzini, G.R., Pesce, C.P., Gonçalves, R.T., Fujarra, A.L.C., Mendes, P. (2018). An experimental investigation on concomitant vortex-induced vibration and axial top-motion excitation with a long flexible cylinder in vertical configuration. Ocean Engineering, 156: 596-612.
 +
[9] Wei, M.H., Lin, K., Jin,L., Zou, D.J. (2016) Nonlinear dynamics of a cable-stayed beam driven by sub-harmonic and principal parametric resonance. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 110: 78-93.
 +
[10] Zhang, J.G. (1985) Summary on the study of gate vibration in China. Water Power, 11: 38-44.
 +
[11] Liu, J.L., Wang, Z.Z., Fang, X., Fang, H.M. (2011) Dynamic instability mechanism and vibration control of radial gate arms. Appl. Mech. Mater., 50: 309-313.
 +
[12] Zhang, J., Xie, Z.X. (2011) Nonlinear vibration and chaos phenomena of arm structures in radial gate. Water Power, 50: 309-313.
 +
[13] Cai, K. Zhang, C. (2011) An optimal construction of a hydropower arch gate. Adv. Mater. Res., 346: 109-115.
 +
[14] Zhang, X.C., Wang, Z.Z., Sun, D.X. (2018) Research on rational layout of strut arms of tainter gate in vertical frame. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingeniería, 34: 1-6.
 +
[15] Hu, M.S., Yang, Z.Z., Xu, J., Zhang, B. (2015) Modal parameter identification of radial gate based on stochastic subspace method. Water resour. power, 33: 164-167.
 +
[16] Nayfeh, A. H., Mook, D. T. (1979) Nonlinear Oscillations. Wiley Publisher, New York.
 +
[17] Chen, Y. S. (2002) Nonlinear Vibration, Higher Education Press, Beijing.
 +
[18] Chen, F.Z., Yan, G.H. (2015) The key technology research on Chinese special type sluice. Hohai University Press, Nanjing.

Revision as of 10:05, 4 November 2019

Nonlinear Parametric Vibration Analysis of Radial Gates Siyuan Wu State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China e-mail: siyuan_wu1992@tongji.edu.cn Zhengzhong Wang College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China e-mail: wangzz0901@163.com Huanjun Jiang 1 State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China e-mail: jhj73@tongji.edu.cn 1 Corresponding Author: Huanjun Jiang ; phone: (+86)18792599934.

Abstract: In this study, based on the dynamic characteristics of radial gates, a nonlinear differential equation of motion for a radial gate arm is derived. The excitation conditions of both principal and subharmonic parametric resonance cases are obtained by using multi-scale and numerical methods. The parameter analysis reveals the following: In comparison to the analytical calculation method (e.g., Multi-scale) of dynamic instability region division, this method effectively analyzes the parametric vibration of radial gates in terms of the end moment, vibration duration, and amplitude. The vibration amplitudes of the arm increase with an increase in its length and excitation amplitude as well as a decrease in the arm inclined angle. Moreover, the parametric resonance excitation is facilitated, and the resonance region becomes larger with an increase in the initial end moment. Comparing with damping effect, vibration response of the arm is mainly affected by the nonlinear behavior in system. Therefore, the energy transfer method (e.g. Add tuned mass dampers) should be taken into account in vibration control. Keywords: Radial gate; parametric vibration; multi-scale method; parameter analysis 1.Introduction A radial gate is a main regulating structure employed in hydraulic engineering, and its stability is directly related to the safe operation of a reservoir. However, the dynamic instability mechanism of radial gates has not been elucidated thus far, and as a result, the existing structures that are constructed without appropriate anti-vibration design are vulnerable. Even if such structures are designed for anti-vibration performance, their design may not comply with current design code [1] and thus may exhibit deficient anti-vibration performance. In recent years, several engineering practices, such as Wachi Dam (1967) in Japan and the Folsom Dam (1995) in the United States, have shown that radial gates will produce different degrees of vibration and even damage structure considerably to flow-induced excitation when the gates were partially opened [2-3]. The lightness, slenderness, and flexibility of the arm render the structure to vibration and dynamic instability easily, when subjected to water loads. Moreover, the increase of water level will reduce the structural frequency, this characteristic indicates that the radial gate should be highly vulnerable under high water head [4]. Consequently, the dynamic stability of the radial gate arm has become a crucial issue with many influence factors that needs to be resolved in both the design and operation stages [5]. According to excitations such as cavity flow, Kármán vortices and special hydrodynamic load, the vibration patterns of the gates can be categorized as follows: forced vibration, self-excited vibration, and parametric vibration. Based on the elongated nature of radial gate arms as mentioned above, among the various types of gates, the parametric vibration only appears in radial gates. The problems of parametric vibration are encountered in many branches of physics and engineering, have been studied extensively, such as in cable structures [6], beam structures [7], plate and shell structures [8], and coupled models of multi-member interaction [9]. In 1980s, Zhang, J.G. [10] observed the phenomenon of parametric vibration during gate operation in dynamic water, considered it as one of the important causes of dynamic instability in the arm through engineering failure examples, and proposed a concise analytical calculation method. Subsequently, there are thought-provoking researches that have been carried out on the division of the dynamic instability region [11]. Although this region can be used to determine whether parametric resonance occurs or not, it does not yield the response amplitude at an arbitrary time. In general, the radial gate is subjected to flow-induced load for a relatively short period of time, and the arm amplitudes continue to fluctuate within a narrow range without the magnification factor tending to infinity. Hence, the method of dynamic instability region may not be an accurate criterion for defining the dynamic instability without considering the time factor. Recently, Zhang, J. and Xie, Z.X. [12] investigated the unstable behavior of nonlinear systems in the radial gate arm under certain dynamic loads and proved the necessity to analyze the stability of radial gate in terms of the excitation amplitude and time duration. In this study, according to the mechanical characteristics of the radial gate, with by completely considering the geometric nonlinear factors caused by the bending moment and large displacement at the high head, the nonlinear differential equation of motion for an arm is derived. The stability of parametric vibration is obtained using multi-scale and numerical methods. Moreover, the effects of excitation factors (water head, frequency, time, and amplitude) and structural factors (inclined angle, length, and damping) on the vibration response of the arm are quantitatively analyzed. 2.Derivation of the nonlinear differential equation of motion Three dimensional overview of the radial gate is shown in Figure 1, the gate contains a face plate to retain water, two major crossbeams, four inclined arms with box-sectional area, major vertical beams and minor beams [13]. The anchor of radial gate arm is attached to piers, which can be regard as a semi-rigid connection. In accordance with Chinese design code SL74-2013 [1], the structure can be simplified as an extended beam, both ends constrained by water seal in y direction, and assembled with arms by welding. The water pressure can pass to piers through face plane, main beams and arms, while, the load acting on main beam can be considered as uniform hydrostatic pressure q by equivalent calculation (see Figure 2). Then on the base of these, further analyze the arm vibration under local coordinate, the model as shown in Figure 3, with the length of the arm L, the transverse displacement v(x,t), flow-induced excitation frequency ωd, the tangential hydrostatic force T0= q (Lb + 2c)/ 2, and the additional tangential hydrodynamic force τ. Due to parametric vibration is induced by harmonic load, so τ can be assumed as the function of harmonic displacement of flow excitation Dd = Adcosωdt.

Figure 1. Three dimensional overview of the radial gate. Figure 2. The main frame of in-plane radial gate. The following basic hypotheses are made before establishing the equation of motion for radial gate arms: (1)Material properties: based on previous hydraulic experiments on full-scale or model gates, the arm, which are considered homogeneous and isotropic, and always behave elastically under design loads, even fails in a predominantly elastic mode (sway-type failures). For convenience and safety, most study of hydraulic experiments, suppose the whole structure work in elastic state. (2)Element type: due to the ends of arm are restricted by major crossbeams and piers, respectively, and its length is much larger than dimensions of cross-section, so the arm can be regarded as a Bernoulli-Euler beam, the torsion and shear effect are negligible. Recently, Zhang, X.C. et al [14] proposed a non-moment design method for eliminating end bending moment of vertical main frame (x-z plane). This method reduces out-of-plane eccentric compression on the arm and improve the overall stability bearing capacity. But the study of in-plane (x-y plane) layout scheme about end bending moment has not been reported thus far, while Hu, M.S. et al. [15] examined that the effect of in-plane initial end bending moment M0 cannot be neglected from prototype observation. According to the above researches, in-plane vibration of arm is discussed in this work. The relation between the deflection and moment can be written as:

                                                                           (1)

where, according to design code (SL74-2013), in order to ensure the safety of the calculation results, the major crossbeam is assumed as a double cantilever beam and M0 = qc2/2. In order to keep derivations in this study clear, according to the relatively simple boundary conditions without loss of generality (Figure 2), The sag of the arm is expressed as follows:

                                                                      (2)

where EI denotes the flexural rigidity and R, the rotational stiffness of semi-rigid connection.

Figure 3. Vibration model of a radial gate arm. The equation of motion for the arm is as follows:

                                (3)

where s represents the lagrange coordinate by the arc length, m is the mass per unit length of the arm and the damping coefficient μ. When α = 90°, the arm is upright, same as layout of Figure 2. According to the geometric deformation and stress state of the arm model, the following results are obtained:

                                                       (4)

where H0 and h represent the axial force and additional axial hydrodynamic force, respectively. By Taylor formula, Equation (5) is expanded at dη/dx = 0:

                                                (5)

According to static force equilibrium equation of radial gate arm:

                                                                  (6)

Substituting Equations (4), (5) and (6) into Equation (3), the following equation is obtained:

                      (7)

The length variation of micro-segment ds' is assumed as follows:

                                                        (8)

where u (x, t) is the longitudinal displacement. Substituting Equation (8) into Equation (4) and neglecting the quadratic term of longitudinal strain gives the following equation:

                                               (9)

As ds ≈ dx, Equation (9) can be rewritten as follows:

                                                          (10)

The boundary conditions for generalized displacements vector (Figure 2) are written as: , , , . (11) Satisfying the boundary conditions (11), by separation of variables, the vibration mode of the arm can be expressed as:

                                                           (12)

where V(t) is the displacement amplitude. According to early analysis, Liu, J.L. et al [11] pointed out that, for radial gate arm vibration induced by flow excitation, the first mode is dominated. Hence, We can use the single mode approximation with neglecting modal interaction. The axial hydrodynamic force of radial gate arm can be expressed as follows:

                                          (13)

where . Substituting Equations (2), (12), and (13) into Equation (7) yields the following equation:

    (14)

Then, according to the Galerkin method, the equation of motion is obtained as follows:

                                             (15)

where , , , , , , , . where ξ is the damping ratio, ω0 corresponds to the first-order natural frequency and λ is the arm parameter of the end moment. In comparison to the classical parametric vibration models [2, 11-12], this model is highly comprehensive and it reflects the characteristics of the parametric vibration of radial gates with greater accuracy. 3.Stability analysis In the present investigation, as both the stretching of the arm and the flow excitation are small, the nonlinear terms and the parametric excitation terms are smaller than the linear terms. Therefore, the method of multiple scales is applied to Equation (15) to asymptotically describe the slow dynamics of the model [16-17]. To weaken the nonlinear terms, the following substitutions are made: , , (16) where ε is a small bookkeeping parameter. Then, Equation (15) can be rewritten as:

                                     (17)

Supposing the solution to Equation (17) can be expressed as:

                                     (18)

where T0 = t, T1 = tε, T2 = tε2. Substituting Equation (18) into Equation (17) and letting the coefficients ε, ε2 and ε3 equal zero, the following equations are obtained:

                                                                          (19)
                                           (20)
    (21)

The complex solution to Equation (19) can be assumed as:

                                                          (22)

where is the complex conjugate of A. Substituting Equation (22) into Equation (20), one gets:

                       (23)

where cc indicates the complex conjugate part. Eliminating the secular terms yields:

                                             (24)

Substituting Equations (22) and (24) into Equation (21) leads to:

          (25)

Through practical observation [10], when excitation frequency ωd approaches 2 times of the structure frequency ωa, the parametric resonance may occur. A detuning parameter σ is introduced to quantify the deviation of ωd from 2ωa, and ωd is described by:

                                                                    (26)

Substituting Equation (26) into Equation (25) and eliminating secular terms yields:

                      (27)

Then, by expressing the function A in the polar form as:

                                                                 (28)

where α(t) and θ(t) are real functions. By substituting this transformation into Equation (27), and separating the resulting real and imaginary parts yield:

                                                (29)
                                 (30)

where γ = ε2σT0 - θ. The stationary solution equation αs and γs can be obtained from Equations (29) and (30) by letting . The vibration amplitude can be expressed as:

                                                    (31)

For αs is a real number, from Equation (31), the stability boundary is given by: , (32) or , (33) From Equations (32) and (33), emerging conditions of subharmonic parametric resonance can be obtained and many parameters like axial force, length of arms, etc. affect the structural motion stability region. It is a kind of way to get the dynamic instability region. But the stable solutions are functions of structural characteristics, which are not including effect of time factor. Therefore, the numerical method is further adopted to analyze. 4.Numerical analysis In this section, the nonlinear responses of the radial gate arm are investigated. As a example, considering a radial gate arm with box-section, the cross-sectional dimensions are shown in Figure 4. The arm length L = 16 m, mass per unit length m = 386 kg/m, and modulus of elasticity E = 210 GPa.

Figure 4. Arm section (unit: mm). Applying the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method to Equation (15), the radial gate arm subjected to the parametric excitation are investigated and the effects of the excitation and structural factors are evaluated. 4.1 Effect of water head According to the Chinese and American codes, the layout of the main beam adopts equivalent load method, and the hydrostatic force H0 is a function of water head. Table 1 summarizes the Chinese super high head radial gates (> 80 m). We first chose the initial disturbance V(0) = 10−4 m, excitation amplitude Ad = 0.01 m, time t = 500 s, damping coefficient μ = 0, and water head H = 0 as a basic case. The Figure 5 shows the influence of water head on the vibration amplitudes, λd denotes the ratio of the external excitation frequency to the natural frequency. Table 1. Super high head radial gates in China. Engineering Location Size of face plane width-height (m) Water head (m) 1 Xiaowan Lantsang 5.0×7.0 163.00 2 Shuibuya Qing River 6.0×7.0 154.00 3 Xiaolangdi Yalong River 4.8×4.8 140.00 4 Jinping-I Yalong River 5.0×6.0 133.00 5 Laxiwa Yellow River 4.0×6.0 132.00 6 Pubugou Dadu River 6.5×8.0 126.28 7 Nuozhadu Lantsang 5.0×8.5 126.00 8 Tianshengqiao-I Pearl River 6.4×7.5 120.00 9 Dongjiang Dong Jiang Lake 6.4×7.5 120.00 10 Longyangxia Yellow River 5.0×7.0 120.00 11 Xiluodu Jinsha River 6.0×6.7 105.50 12 Jiangpinghe Loushui River 6.0×6.0 105.14 13 Longtan Hongshui River 5.0×8.0 90.00 14 Dagangshan Dadu River 6.0×6.6 83.00 15 Goupitan Wujiang River 10.0×9.0 81.00

When the principal parametric resonance occurs, the amplitude of the arm increases with the water head, and the maximum displacement reaches 0.57 m. In the case of subharmonic parametric resonance, the change is contrasting, and the maximum amplitude is 0.18 m. Overall, both the types of parametric resonance responses change slowly, so supposes the axial hydrostatic force generated by 80 m water head in further analysis.

Figure 5. Vibration amplitude–water head curves. 4.2 Effects of excitation frequency ratio and initial end bending moment Figure 6 depicts the relationship curves plotted between the vibration amplitude and the excitation frequency ratio when subjected to the initial end bending moment of different water heads. As shown in the figure, at H = 0, the peak value of parametric resonance only appears at λd = 1 and λd = 2. This phenomenon conforms to the current design code “Design Code for Steel Gate in Water Resources and Hydropower Projects (SL74-2013)” (2013). Figure 7 shows that when the initial end bending moment is not considered, the beat vibration phenomenon can be observed, and the beat amplitude value increases over time at the subharmonic parametric resonance. However, considering the initial end bending moment (Figure 6), the amplitude peak shifts and the arm response amplitudes increase with the initial end bending moment level and the resonance region become larger, which facilitates parametric resonance excitation. According to the design retaining water height of the gate, 80 m is the critical value between high head gates and super high head gates, and maximum existing design head is 163 m (Table 1). The maximum displacements of parametric resonance are 1.44 m and 2.20 m at water heads of 80 m and 163 m, respectively. Through the above analysis, it is further elucidated that the parametric resonance excitation condition given in Chinese code is a special case in the parametric resonance region, which only considers the parametric resonance occurring at nearly twice the natural frequency. In order to obtain a higher accuracy response of the arm, the proposed calculation method of the instability regions in this study should be adopted.

(a) H < 100 m (b) H ≥ 100 m Figure 6. Vibration amplitude–excitation frequency ratio curves.

(a) λd = 1 (b) λd = 2 Figure 7. Displacement time–history curves 4.3 Effect of excitation amplitude

Figure 8. Vibration amplitude–excitation amplitude curves. Figure 8 shows the relationship curve between the displacement and the excitation amplitude. The graph shows that when parametric resonance occurs, the displacement response is closely related to the excitation amplitude. The response increases nonlinearly with an increase in the excitation amplitude. When the excitation amplitude is less than 0.08 m, the subharmonic parametric resonance response is greater than the principal parametric resonance response. On the other hand, when the excitation amplitude is greater than 0.08 m, both the parametric resonance responses are almost equal. When the excitation amplitude is less than 0.01 m, the arm swings in a smaller range, making it difficult to form a destructive vibration. Hence, the response of the arm should be completely considered with respect to the factor of excitation amplitudes. 4.4 Effect of inclined angle The effect of inclined angle on the vibration amplitude is presented in Figure 9. The amplitude displacement increases significantly at subharmonic parametric resonance with the angle. However, at parametric resonance, when the angle is less than 45 degrees, the amplitude increases rapidly and then remains steady. Hence, the inclined angle should be considered along with the displacement constraint in the design of radial gates.

Figure 9. Vibration amplitude–inclined angle curves. 4.5 Effect of arm length and excitation time According to the characteristics of conventional radial gate and special planar radial gate, as mentioned in the study by Chen, F.Z. and Yan, G.H. [18], the arm length from 5 to 25 m is examined in this study. The relationship curve is plotted between the amplitude and the length of arm, as shown in Figure 10.

Figure 10. Vibration amplitude–length curves. It can be found that the calculated results are not in agreement with the description of the conventional partitioning method for unstable regions In the past review, with an increase in the length of the arm, its flexibility and response amplitude should increase simultaneously. However, the inflection point appears in Figure 10, and a nonlinear curve dependence is noted. Then, the time history analysis at a, b, c, and d on both sides of the inflection are given in Figure 11. When the arm length is greater than 45 m and 20 m at λd = 1 and λd = 2, a longer excitation time is needed to reach the peak response. This result proves that the gate may not show a strong vibration at the initial stage of the local opening operation, while the vibration amplitude will become considerably higher across time until the structure reaches integral instability failure. The results also prove that it is not advisable to ignore the time factor in the conventional design. From the above analysis, it is noted that the time factor of the local opening should be considered in the initial design stage. Meanwhile, in the stages of completion and operation, the corresponding guidelines of local opening range and opening–closing time should be given in detail according to the vibration analysis results in a project. It is practical to choose the length of radial gate arm to be less then 20 m in 500 s according to the case presented in this exploration.

(a) λd = 1, L = 45 (Vmax = 0.2291) (b) λd = 1, L = 60 (Vmax = 0.2427)

(c) λd = 2, L = 10 (Vmax = 0.8116) (d) λd = 2, L = 20 (Vmax = 0.9604) Figure 11. Displacement time-history curves 4.6 Effect of damping

(a)λd = 1 (b) λd = 2 Figure 12. Vibration amplitude–damping ratio curves. Figure 12 illustrates the relationship between amplitude and damping ratio under different excitation amplitudes. As shown in the figure, the amplitude nonlinearly decreases with an increase in the damping ratio. Furthermore, the amplitude decreases rapidly at λd = 1, ξ < 0.01, and then remains steady. The damping decrement at λd = 2 is slightly higher than that at λd = 1. Overall, the damping effect to vibration control is not very obvious, once the parametric resonance excitation is achieved, the resonance amplitudes are significantly affected by the nonlinear term of system rather than the damping coefficient. Hence, when an energy transfer method, such as adding tuned mass dampers, is employed, the vibration suppressed effectiveness is better. 5. Conclusions This paper presents the nonlinear parametric vibration of radial gates. The nonlinear differential equation of motion for the radial gate arm is derived by considering the geometrically nonlinear. Furthermore, the stability and vibration response of principal and subharmonic parametric resonance cases are investigated by using multi-scale and numerical methods. At the same time, the numerical analysis overcomes the limitations of the former methods, in which the dynamic instability regions are divided without considering the effects of response amplitude and time. The results are discussed as follows: (1)The change in the hydrostatic force caused by the water head has a negligible effect on the parametric vibration, while the resonance region broadens with an increase in the initial bending moment. (2)An increase in amplitude response leads to an increase in both the excitation amplitude and arm length and a decrease in the inclined angle. (3)The vibration amplitude becomes significantly higher with time. Therefore, the time factor should be considered in the design and operation stages. (4)Comparing with damping effect, the vibration response mainly depends on the nonlinear behavior. Thus, the energy transfer method should be adopted to suppress the vibration.

Acknowledgements This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51179164 and 51478354). References [1] CMWR (China Ministry of Water Resources). (2013) Design Code for Steel Gate in Water Resources and Hydropower Projects (SL74-2013). China Water & Power Press, Beijing. [2] Niu, Z.G., Li, T.C. (2008) Research on Dynamic Stability of Steel Radial Gates. In: Earth and Space. Long Beach. pp. 1-8. [3] Oh, L.S., Hoje, S., Won, K.J. (2018) Flow-induced vibration of a radial gate at various opening heights. Eng. Appl. Comp. Fluid, 12: 567-583. [4] Brusewicz, K. Sterpejkowicz-Wersocki, W. Jankowski, R. (2017) Modal analysis of a steel radial gate exposed to different water levels. Arch. Hydro Eng. Environ. Mech., 64: 37-47. [5] Wang, Z.Z., Zhang, X.C., Liu, J.L. (2017) Advances and developing trends in research of large hydraulic steel gates. J. Hydroelectr. Eng., 36: 1-18. [6] Demsic, M., Uros, M., Lazarevic, A.J., Lazarevic, D. (2019) Resonance regions due to interaction of forced and parametric vibration of a parabolic cable. J. Sound. Vib., 447: 78-104. [7] Zhang, X., Peng, J., Wang, L. (2014) Parametric resonances in the two-to-one resonant beams on elastic foundation. Nonlinear Dynam., 77: 339-352. [8] Franzini, G.R., Pesce, C.P., Gonçalves, R.T., Fujarra, A.L.C., Mendes, P. (2018). An experimental investigation on concomitant vortex-induced vibration and axial top-motion excitation with a long flexible cylinder in vertical configuration. Ocean Engineering, 156: 596-612. [9] Wei, M.H., Lin, K., Jin,L., Zou, D.J. (2016) Nonlinear dynamics of a cable-stayed beam driven by sub-harmonic and principal parametric resonance. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 110: 78-93. [10] Zhang, J.G. (1985) Summary on the study of gate vibration in China. Water Power, 11: 38-44. [11] Liu, J.L., Wang, Z.Z., Fang, X., Fang, H.M. (2011) Dynamic instability mechanism and vibration control of radial gate arms. Appl. Mech. Mater., 50: 309-313. [12] Zhang, J., Xie, Z.X. (2011) Nonlinear vibration and chaos phenomena of arm structures in radial gate. Water Power, 50: 309-313. [13] Cai, K. Zhang, C. (2011) An optimal construction of a hydropower arch gate. Adv. Mater. Res., 346: 109-115. [14] Zhang, X.C., Wang, Z.Z., Sun, D.X. (2018) Research on rational layout of strut arms of tainter gate in vertical frame. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingeniería, 34: 1-6. [15] Hu, M.S., Yang, Z.Z., Xu, J., Zhang, B. (2015) Modal parameter identification of radial gate based on stochastic subspace method. Water resour. power, 33: 164-167. [16] Nayfeh, A. H., Mook, D. T. (1979) Nonlinear Oscillations. Wiley Publisher, New York. [17] Chen, Y. S. (2002) Nonlinear Vibration, Higher Education Press, Beijing. [18] Chen, F.Z., Yan, G.H. (2015) The key technology research on Chinese special type sluice. Hohai University Press, Nanjing.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 22/01/20
Accepted on 10/12/19
Submitted on 05/06/19

Volume 36, Issue 1, 2020
DOI: 10.23967/j.rimni.2019.12.004
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 404
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?