m (JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 732190949 to Miliopoulou* 2024a) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This paper presents the methodology for calculating the peak deviator stress and strain at peak deviator stress uncertainty of triaxial compression tests on water saturated, non-cohesive soils consolidated under isotropic conditions. A silicious sand sample is prepared in the same way to produce identical cylindrical specimens. These are then tested under the same conditions. Type A and type B uncertainty are calculated separately and used to yield the combined and expanded uncertainty of the main results, peak deviator stress and strain at peak deviator stress. For both measurands, type A uncertainty is significantly higher that type B and it is the factor mainly affecting the overall uncertainty of the results | This paper presents the methodology for calculating the peak deviator stress and strain at peak deviator stress uncertainty of triaxial compression tests on water saturated, non-cohesive soils consolidated under isotropic conditions. A silicious sand sample is prepared in the same way to produce identical cylindrical specimens. These are then tested under the same conditions. Type A and type B uncertainty are calculated separately and used to yield the combined and expanded uncertainty of the main results, peak deviator stress and strain at peak deviator stress. For both measurands, type A uncertainty is significantly higher that type B and it is the factor mainly affecting the overall uncertainty of the results | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Full Paper == | ||
+ | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_7321909496.pdf</pdf> |
This paper presents the methodology for calculating the peak deviator stress and strain at peak deviator stress uncertainty of triaxial compression tests on water saturated, non-cohesive soils consolidated under isotropic conditions. A silicious sand sample is prepared in the same way to produce identical cylindrical specimens. These are then tested under the same conditions. Type A and type B uncertainty are calculated separately and used to yield the combined and expanded uncertainty of the main results, peak deviator stress and strain at peak deviator stress. For both measurands, type A uncertainty is significantly higher that type B and it is the factor mainly affecting the overall uncertainty of the results
Published on 07/06/24
Submitted on 07/06/24
Volume From measurement to reliable in situ geotechnical site characterization – statistical data processing, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.006
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?