Abstract

Navigating the complex landscape of adolescence in the digital age presents unique challenges, with social media, technological divides, and academic pressures intensifying the already demanding expectations placed on teenagers. This study explores the role of Emotional Intelligence (EI) in ethical decision-making among high school students. Emotional Intelligence, encompassing abilities such as self-awareness, empathy, and emotional regulation, plays a crucial role in understanding and managing emotions, which is essential for ethical reasoning.   A survey was conducted among 68 students from an ethnically and academically diverse suburban high school, assessing their EI levels and ethical decision-making capabilities through a series of dilemmas. The results indicate a significant correlation between higher EI scores and better ethical decision-making abilities. Respondents with higher EI were more adept at navigating moral dilemmas, suggesting that EI serves as a valuable predictor of ethical behavior.   Additionally, a secondary survey compared students' theoretical ethical choices with their anticipated real-life actions, highlighting the influence of peer pressure and social norms on decision-making. The findings underscore the importance of fostering EI skills in educational settings to better equip students for the ethical challenges they will face.   This study contributes to the growing body of literature on the intersection of EI and ethics, emphasizing the need for holistic educational approaches that prioritize emotional and ethical development. Future research should expand to diverse populations and employ longitudinal methods to further elucidate the causal relationships between EI and ethical decision-making.

Abstract

Despite being a women's problem for a long time, catcalling has recently attracted lawmakers' attention. In 2019, the Philippine government enacted Republic Act 11313, or the Safe Spaces Act, which prohibits and punishes gender-based sexual harassment. However, despite the existence of the law, catcalling continues to be rampant. This study aims to explore the experiences of women in Quezon City who have been subjected to catcalling and to provide answers regarding the effects of catcalling on the victims, the locations where catcalling is most prevalent, the most common perpetrators, and the victim's views on the Safe Spaces Act. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach. Purposive sampling was used to select respondents, and respondents were interviewed using an interview guide to gather information. The findings indicate that women are most vulnerable to catcalling in public spaces, and the perpetrators are strangers or bystanders. Victims went through mental, emotional, and behavioral changes after the incident. Moreover, not all victims think that the law effectively addresses the problem because catcalling is still prevalent, and public awareness campaigns are lacking.

Abstract

Some of the most relevant facts that are affecting the scientific publication and its impact are the transformations that have begun to happen in relation to what has been called Open Science. This represents a new approach to the scientific process, which is based on cooperative work and is inevitably linked to Open Access publishing. And although the latter term is linked to immediate and free access to research articles, it has evolved towards a much more complete concept involving the transformation of scientific practice to "share knowledge as soon as possible". The transformation towards Open Science has been assumed by the European Commission, which carrying out different measures in this regard. But, despite the obvious advantages of Open Access publishing, it will not be an easy task to make search results universally accessible without restriction. This objective faces the inertia of custom practices and a market dominated by a few large publishers. The idea of ​​developing a platform to answer many of the questions raised about the future of scientific publication is the outcome of many reflections and discussions on the presented scenario. Scipedia (see http://www.scipedia.com) is essentially a web platform that integrates a digital scientific publishing platform with the concept of social network. Scipedia aims to improve communication between researchers and professionals in science and technology, facilitating the exchange of knowledge and dissemination of their work. The ambition of this project is to be able to offer free publication services in Open Access to the entire scientific community. To this end, Scipedia integrates tools that allow the publication of journals and the management of their publication cycle, including support for blind and collaborative peer review.   But probably one of the most innovative aspects of this initiative is that it uses wikitext, a standard format for web pages, as a native format of publications. This definitely allows going beyond the paper support and its digital versions (such as the PDF format); the scientific communication can take full advantage of the publication on the Internet. This way, scientific journals and books, conference proceedings and any other document published in Scipedia can integrate text, multimedia information, data files, models, etc. in a natural way. In addition, Scipedia has an advanced online editor that allows for collaborative work and facilitates self-publishing. The capacity of self-publishing is not a trivial matter, since it virtually reduces production and publication costs to zero, and is basic to fulfilling the project's main ambition: to offer free publishing services for the author and open access without restrictions. The online editing tool is completed with utilities for importing files in LaTeX and Word formats, and exporting to PDF and ePub. Another relevant aspect of the initiative is that various strategies have been designed that allow articles to reach the maximum impact. For this, it is not enough to comply with certain standards and procedures that facilitate their indexation in the main search engines and aggregators. Here, the integration of the platform into a social network can play a fundamental role. Scipedia social network offers the standard tools of this type of platforms, creation of a user profile, creation of a network of contacts, presentation of the register of personal activities and of the contacts, creation and management of groups, etc. The basic information of the profile can be imported and synchronized with the data available in Google Scholar, which provides a first reference of the impact of the scientific activity of the user. This information is enriched with that generated by the personal activity in the network, which is dynamized using gamification techniques. This way, the actions of the user are rewarded and allow to evaluate the activity that generates in the network. In addition, records of visits and ratings of readers of an article are kept, which together with more traditional techniques such as citation counting, allows you to evaluate the impact of any document. In addition, each published document has a discussion page attached, and a history of all its revisions is maintained, even beyond the date of its publication.

Abstract

Some of the most relevant facts that are affecting the scientific publication and its impact are the transformations that have begun to happen in relation to what has been called Open Science. This represents a new approach to the scientific process, which is based on cooperative work and is inevitably linked to Open Access publishing. And although the latter term is linked to immediate and free access to research articles, it has evolved towards a much more complete concept involving the transformation of scientific practice to "share knowledge as soon as possible". The transformation towards Open Science has been assumed by the European Commission, which carrying out different measures in this regard. But, despite the obvious advantages of Open Access publishing, it will not be an easy task to make search results universally accessible without restriction. This objective faces the inertia of custom practices and a market dominated by a few large publishers. The idea of ​​developing a platform to answer many of the questions raised about the future of scientific publication is the outcome of many reflections and discussions on the presented scenario. Scipedia (see http://www.scipedia.com) is essentially a web platform that integrates a digital scientific publishing platform with the concept of social network. Scipedia aims to improve communication between researchers and professionals in science and technology, facilitating the exchange of knowledge and dissemination of their work. The ambition of this project is to be able to offer free publication services in Open Access to the entire scientific community. To this end, Scipedia integrates tools that allow the publication of journals and the management of their publication cycle, including support for blind and collaborative peer review.   But probably one of the most innovative aspects of this initiative is that it uses wikitext, a standard format for web pages, as a native format of publications. This definitely allows going beyond the paper support and its digital versions (such as the PDF format); the scientific communication can take full advantage of the publication on the Internet. This way, scientific journals and books, conference proceedings and any other document published in Scipedia can integrate text, multimedia information, data files, models, etc. in a natural way. In addition, Scipedia has an advanced online editor that allows for collaborative work and facilitates self-publishing. The capacity of self-publishing is not a trivial matter, since it virtually reduces production and publication costs to zero, and is basic to fulfilling the project's main ambition: to offer free publishing services for the author and open access without restrictions. The online editing tool is completed with utilities for importing files in LaTeX and Word formats, and exporting to PDF and ePub. Another relevant aspect of the initiative is that various strategies have been designed that allow articles to reach the maximum impact. For this, it is not enough to comply with certain standards and procedures that facilitate their indexation in the main search engines and aggregators. Here, the integration of the platform into a social network can play a fundamental role. Scipedia social network offers the standard tools of this type of platforms, creation of a user profile, creation of a network of contacts, presentation of the register of personal activities and of the contacts, creation and management of groups, etc. The basic information of the profile can be imported and synchronized with the data available in Google Scholar, which provides a first reference of the impact of the scientific activity of the user. This information is enriched with that generated by the personal activity in the network, which is dynamized using gamification techniques. This way, the actions of the user are rewarded and allow to evaluate the activity that generates in the network. In addition, records of visits and ratings of readers of an article are kept, which together with more traditional techniques such as citation counting, allows you to evaluate the impact of any document. In addition, each published document has a discussion page attached, and a history of all its revisions is maintained, even beyond the date of its publication.