Abstract

This paper presents the results of direct and indirect field investigations carried out as part of a detailed soil investigation of granular Rhine soil in Germany. After a brief overview of the project and geological conditions in the project area, the results of the field investigations are shown in a compressed and comprehensive manner. Focus of the presented results are the DMT, which are a novelty for projects in Germany. The presented results clearly indicate the challenges regarding the interpretation of the test results in the mainly dense to very dense sands and gravels, as especially the results of the DMT tend to scatter a lot. Despite the interpretation challenges, a comparative analysis of the CPT and DMT is carried out showing possible relations between dilatometer modulus Ed, friction angle DMT , corrected cone resistance qt and relative density ID. The relations are discussed, and limitations are presented. Afterwards, a strength-based correlation between CPT and DMT to determine the effective friction angle as a function of the cone resistance is presented indicating reasonable results for the investigated soils in the project area. The paper finishes with a discussion of limitations of the DMT and conclusions.

Abstract

Although gravelly soils have been observed to liquefy in 27 earthquakes in the past 120 years, many engineers believe that gravel cannot liquefy due to its high hydraulic conductivity. Gradations from gravel liquefaction case histories have shown these deposits typically contain 25 to 40% sand, reducing the hydraulic conductivity and enabling excess pore pressures to cause liquefaction. While cone penetrometers (CPT), typically used to evaluate liquefaction resistance in sand, may show increases in penetration resistance due to their small diameter relative to gravel particles, the CPT has successfully predicted gravel liquefaction for looser sandy gravels. Case histories in Wellington, New Zealand demonstrate the successful identification of gravel liquefaction hazards using CPT. Although some layers in the profile indicated high penetration resistance, most of the profile was correctly predicted to liquefy. The Soil Behavior Type (SBT) from the CPT did not consistently indicate a sandy gravel profile but was often classified as behaving like a sand or silty sand; likely influenced by higher sand percentages between gravel particles. To evaluate the ability of the CPT to characterize gravelly soils and their liquefaction potential, additional field case histories are desirable. This paper presents test results from two case histories, one in Wellington, New Zealand, and one in Petrinja, Croatia, where gravels have liquefied. In both cases, the CPT occasionally overestimated liquefaction resistance in gravel layers. The advantages of using a 74 mm diameter Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DPT) are also highlighted with companion testing.