Abstract

A geotechnical assessment of mine tailings state conditions using the static cone penetration test performed at different tailings storage facilities (TSF’s) will be presented in this paper. Both tailings evaluated herein are deposited as a slurry (hydraulic deposition) and have similar grain-size distribution curves. A set of Cone Penetration Tests (CPTu) with pore pressure measurements were performed at each site to evaluate the state of the tailings. To assess the contractive-dilative behavior classical methodologies were adopted such as i) the contractive/dilative boundary suggested by Robertson (2016) ii) the approach suggested by Plewes et al. (1992) and cited by Jefferies and Been (2016) and iii) the yield stress ratio method proposed by Mayne and Sharp (2019). Partial drainage effects will be identified with classical methodologies. The results were compared to evaluate the difference and limitations of each methodology. Comments on the similarity between the two tailings evaluated herein will also be presented to explain the differences in behavior due to aspects such as mineralogy, gradation, stress history and deposition.

Abstract

Flow liquefaction is observed in saturated or nearly saturated geomaterials, showing a strain-softening response during undrained shear, primarily in very loose sands and silts, as well as in very sensitive clays. The Cone Penetration Test (CPTu) has been gaining popularity among the geotechnical community to evaluate the state of a soil profile due to its good repeatability, detailed information on the soil stratigraphy and extensive detailed scientific studies to guide the application of the test results. Susceptibility to flow liquefaction is typically evaluated by estimating the in-situ state parameter (𝜓) since it directly correlates to the soil behaviour at large strain, as shown by Jefferies & Been (2016). Mayne & Sharp (2019) suggested using the yield-stress-ratio (YSR = σp’/σv0’) to estimate the soil state using a threshold of YSR ≈ 3. Currently, in the Brazilian Mining Industry, it is common to find the application of different approaches to evaluating the susceptibility of mining tailings to flow liquefaction (e.g., Plewes et al., 1992; Olson, 2001; Shuttle & Cunning, 2008; Robertson, 2016). This paper presents an evaluation of the susceptibility of an iron ore tailings (IOTs) to flow liquefaction using the following recently published approaches: i) Mayne and Sharp (2019), using the yield stress ratio (YSR) approach; ii) Smith et al. (2021), using a generalised CPTu state parameter inversion method based on the NorSand Widget; and iii) Robertson (2022), with the updated Kc. The main results show a good convergence between the three methodologies used.