Abstract

The fundamentals for predicting the mechanical behavior of soils by in situ tests have been developed for conventional soils (either clay or sand) based on the stress history. The behavior of unusual geomaterials, such as the tropical soils, is characterized by bonding and structure, anisotropy as well as by the unsaturated condition. The behavior of tropical soils cannot be correctly predicted by models and correlations developed by the Classical Soil Mechanics. This paper presents the fundamentals of the behavioral classifications used to interpret CPT and SDMT and discusses their applicability to tropical soils, especially those of pedogenetic evolution of sandstone. Laboratory and in situ tests (CPTu and SDMT) were carried out at two research sites in São Paulo state, Brazil, at different periods of the year to better understand the soil behavior and the seasonal effects. Classifications and correlations to estimate soil parameters from CPTu and SDMT are assessed. Interrelationships between elastic parameters of small (G0) and large to medium strain parameters (qc, ED, MDMT) determined by in situ tests are presented to identify the presence of microstructure and unusual soil behavior. Classification criteria based on these relationships to identify collapsible soils also is presented

Abstract

CPTu tests have gained prominence in the geotechnical characterization of materials, registering a significant increase in their application in the Brazilian context, especially due to requirements to consider undrained resistance in analyses guided by more recent regulations. However, the interpretation of these tests often lacks a detailed and personalized approach, as they disregard specific nuances of each location. In this study, the foundation of a dam made up of tropical soil with a specific hydrogeological condition, characterized by bottom drainage with deep percolation, previously identified in other research campaigns, was evaluated. The interpretation of the CPTu test aimed to estimate the undrained resistance of the material through two different approaches: considering the dissipation tests carried out to model the insitu pore pressure according to the elevation versus a hypothetical hydrostatic condition, which could be misinterpreted in places where there is a predominance of SPT tests and insufficient geological knowledge. Multiple methodologies were evaluated to interpret undrained shear strength, including approaches that use Bq directly and that exclusively considers the laboratory characterization of a sample and the overconsolidation ratio at that point. In this case analyzed, it was observed that the change in pore pressure conditions resulted in a considerable variation in the undrained shear strength ratio, over 10% when pore pressures are considered in the equations. The results highlight the relevance of considering local hydrogeological conditions when interpreting field tests, especially for foundations of large structures.