Abstract

The evaluation of in-situ behaviour, strength and compressibility of a soil profile is routinely performed by geotechnical engineers through field tests, such as the seismic piezocone penetration test (SCPTu), the flat dilatometer test (DMT) and the field vane shear test (FVT). This paper aims to compare the results of a CPTu, DMT and FVT to evaluate an organic alluvium soil in terms of: i) in-situ soil behaviour classification, ii) undrained shear strength and iii) stress history. To compare and complement the in-situ results, laboratory tests were carried out to determine the grain-size distribution, the Atterberg Limits, the pre-consolidation pressure, the organic content and the undrained shear strength under isotropic consolidation triaxial test (CIUC). The results showed that the soil evaluated herein exhibited a clay-like behaviour based on the classification system of both tests (DMT and SCPTu), which agrees with the laboratory characterization. Furthermore, the OCR (overconsolidation ratio) calculated from the SCPTu and DMT also shows a convergence with the values determined from laboratory tests. The SCPTu performed in this soil was predominantly undrained and enabled the calculation of undrained shear strength. Based on this, the methodologies based on Nkt and N∆u (from SCPTu) were compared with the undrained shear strength from the FVT and that obtained from DMT, based on the KD parameter. Finally, a comparison is presented to discuss the influence of shear mode in the undrained shear strength and the applicability of the methodologies used to evaluate the soil behaviour and the stress history.