Abstract

Residual soils are non-textbook materials that are hard to be modelled by traditional soil mechanics, which creates serious difficulties in the in-situ test interpretations and the consequent applications to geotechnical design. This is due to the presence of a cementation structure that is responsible for a cohesive-frictional behaviour of these soils, meaning that two strength parameters must be derived to represent the overall strength. Furthermore, cementation structure also deeply affects the stiffness behaviour, deviating from typical response of transported soils. The common interpretation of in-situ tests usually considers extreme behaviours represented by only one parameter, namely undrained cohesion for clays and angle of shearing resistance for sands, which naturally do not work in these cohesive-frictional materials. For this purpose, only tests that take two or more independent measurements can be used to solve this problem, as it is the case of SCPTu, SDMT and PMT tests, while SPT and DPSH tests cannot be effective in this determination. Portuguese research institutions have been looking over the granitic residual soil characterization through specific research works, from which resulted several publications on the subject. Following previous research works of calibration with (S)DMT (Cruz, 2010) and (S)CPTu (Cruz et al. 2018) tests performed in Polytechnic Institute of Guarda (IPG), Portugal, a new research frame was developed to settle a methodology for obtaining strength parameters of granitic residual soils from pressuremeter tests (PMT), which is presented and discussed herein.