Abstract

Simplified methods for seismic liquefaction assessment based on the flat dilatometer test (DMT), in which the liquefaction triggering curve is defined based on the horizontal stress index (KD), have been proposed over the years. One major drawback of the existing methods, valid for clean sand, is the lack of a correction factor for the fines content. An updating of the empirical relationship CRR-KD proposed by Chiaradonna and Monaco (2022) to incorporate the effects of the fines content is currently under development and validation. This paper illustrates the results obtained from application of the new method at the site of San Carlo – Terre del Reno (Ferrara) located in the Emilia-Romagna plain (Italy), where widespread liquefaction occurred in the 2012 seismic sequence. A comprehensive site characterization from previous insitu and laboratory tests carried out by various research groups is available for the sand, silty sand and sandy silt deposits in the San Carlo area. The performance of the new CRR-KD curve accounting for the fines content effect is compared with that obtained by adopting the “clean sand” curves proposed by Chiaradonna and Monaco (2022), as well as with that obtained by using the CPT-based method by Boulanger and Idriss (2014). Even though verified only for specific Italian soils in this area and requiring further field validation, the proposed approach appears as promising to improve the DMTbased liquefaction assessment in silty sands.

Abstract

The Dilatometer Fondasol Test (DFT) is a unidirectional loading test in a borehole that provides an in-situ stress-strain curve. Two rigid shells are spread in the soil at a constant displacement rate by several small hydraulic jacks. First results using this probe in soils were obtained by Besson (2022) who also provided methods to compute from the stress-strain curve both a pseudo-elastic modulus and a limit stress. However, additional data were required to establish strong correlations between the dilatometer parameters and the pressuremeter parameters. This paper introduces new results obtained in various sites in France and synthetises all the results obtained so far. For each site, pressuremeter soundings and dilatometer soundings are carried out in pairs using the same drilling methods. DFT and PMT are performed at the same depths and at the same strain rate. For the computation of moduli and limit stresses, semi-automatic methods are employed to prevent subjective interpretations. Correlations are proposed between the dilatometer modulus and the pressuremeter modulus as well as between the dilatometer limit stress and the pressuremeter limit pressure. The established correlations, along with their limitations, are interpreted.