Abstract

Paper submission from Erik Verhoef (everhoef@econ.vu.nl)Discussion Paper Submission Form - STEP 1This discussion paper abstract is submitted by Erik Verhoef (everhoef@econ.vu.nl)Template-Type: ReDIF-Paper 1.0Series: Tinbergen Institute Discussion PapersCreation-Date: Number: Author-Name: Erik T VerhoefAuthor-Email: everhoef@econ.vu.nlAuthor-Workplace-Name: VUTitle: SECOND-BEST CONGESTION PRICING SCHEMES IN THE MONOCENTRIC CITYAbstract:This paper considers second-best congestion pricing in the monocentric city, with endogenous residential density and endogenous labour supply. A spatial general equilibrium model is developed that allows consideration of the three-way interactions between urban density, traffic congestion and labour supply. Congestion pricing schemes are analyzed that are second-best ‘by design’ (and not because distortions exist elsewhere in the spatial economy), like cordon charging and flat kilometre charges. Both for Cobb-Douglas utility and for CES utility, the analyses suggest that the relative welfare losses from second-best pricing, compared to first-best pricing, are surprisingly small.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0094119005000495?httpAccept=text/plain,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.06.003 under the license https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=603263,
https://core.ac.uk/display/15455696,
https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai%3Aresearch.vu.nl%3Apublications%2F93b473a7-bb2b-4520-8995-515ebe826c49,
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juecon/v58y2005i3p367-388.html,
https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/second-best-congestion-pricing-schemes-in-the-monocentric-city,
https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/tinwpaper/20040110.htm,
https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/86224,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2138761245


DOIS: 10.1016/j.jue.2005.06.003 10.2139/ssrn.603263

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2004

Volume 2004, 2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2005.06.003
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?