Deep renovation interventions on existing buildings remain currently unattractive due to technical, financial and cultural/social barriers. Now that the European Union 2018 Energy Performance Directive aims to “reach the long-term greenhouse gas emission goal and decarbonize the building stock”, Member States may use their long-term renovation strategies to address risks also related to fire hazards and seismic loads in addition to energy renovation. This opens a wider market for innovative approaches in retrofit of existing buildings. The current paper illustrates the primary outcomes of an ongoing multidisciplinary Horizon 2020 research project (called e-SAFE), tackling the integration of energy, seismic and architectural renovation interventions through an innovative and combinable technological solution, applicable to non-historic RC framed buildings (i.e. built after 1950) and easily adaptable to specific climatic conditions, seismicity levels and other boundary conditions. Hence, the proposed solution will contribute to the de-carbonization of the EU building stock, reducing the occurrence of natural hazards related to climate changes, and, at the same time, to the improvement of the social resilience against earthquakes and to the enhancement of buildings architectural image. The seismic retrofit technology consists in the external application of modular prefabricated Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) panels on the existing perimetral walls. These panels are connected to the beams of two consecutive floors by means of friction dampers and provide additional lateral stiffness and strength to the existing structure, thus reducing the storey drift demand in case of earthquake. The friction dampers cut the force transmitted by the CLT panel to the structure and dissipate energy, which further reduce the drift demand. Strength, stiffness and dissipation capacity provided by the system are controlled by modulating the thickness and the number of CLT panels, as well as the friction dampers size. In this research phase, friction damper prototypes have been designed in order to optimize both mechanical performance and production process. Detailed numerical models allowed to investigate the stress distribution in the dissipative connections. The results of the preliminary testing campaign will be presented and discussed in this paper, also in relation with the findings of the numerical analysis and future tests.
[1] Directive 2010/31/EC. Energy performance of buildings, directive of the European parliament and of the council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast)European parliament. 2016
[2] La Greca, P.; Margani, G. Seismic and Energy Renovation Measures for Sustainable Cities: A Critical Analysis of the Italian Scenario. Sustainability 2018, 10(1), 254.
[3] Presidency of the Council of Ministers Italian Civil Protection Department. National risk assessment. Overview of the potential major disasters in Italy: seismic, volcanic, tsunami, hydro-geological/hydraulic and extreme weather, droughts and forest fire risks. 2018
[4] Chandrakar, J.; Singh, A.K. Study of Various Local and Global Seismic Retrofitting Strategies – A review. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology 2017, 6(06), 824-831.
[5] Bournas, D. Innovative Materials for Seismic and Energy Retrofitting of the Existing EU Buildings; EUR 29184 EN, Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2018.
[6] Lau, D.; Qiu, Q.; Zhou, A.; Lun, C. Long term performance and fire safety aspect of FRP composites used in building structures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 126, 573–585.
[7] Tetta, Z.C.; Koutas, L.N.; Bournas, D.A. Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) in shear strengthening of concrete beams. Compos. Part B 2015, 77, 338-348.
[8] Rahimi, A.; Maheri, M. R. The effects of steel X-brace retrofitting of RC frames on the seismic performance of frames and their elements. Eng. Struct. 2019, 206.
[9] Barbagallo F., Bosco M., Marino E.M., Rossi P.P., Stramondo P.R. A multi‐performance design method for seismic upgrading of existing RC frames by BRBs; Earthq. Eng. Struct. D. 46 (2017) 1099–1119.
[10] Mazza, F.; Pucci, D. Static vulnerability of an existing r.c. structure and seismic retrofitting by CFRP and base-isolation: A case study. Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2016, 84, 1-12.
[11] Bjo ̈rnfot A, Boggian F, Steinsvik Nyga ̊rd A, Tomasi R (2017) Strengthening of traditional buildings with slim panels of cross-laminated timber (CLT). In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on structural health assessment of timber structures (SHATIS’17), Istanbul, 20–22 September
[12] Stazi, F.; Serpilli, M.; Maracchini, G.; Pavone, A. An experimental and numerical study on CLT panels used as infill shear walls for RC buildings retrofit. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 211, 605-616.
[13] Sustersic, I.; Dujic, B. Seismic shaking table testing of a reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill strenghtened with cross laminated timber panels. World Conference on Timber Engineering, Quebec City, Canada, August 10-14, 2014.
[14] Margani, G.; Evola, G.; Tardo, C.; Marino, E.M. Energy, Seismic and Architectural Renovation of RC Framed Buildings with Prefabricated Timber Panels. Sustainability 2020, 12(12), 4845.
[15] Zheng L., Hanlin D., Xijun W., Minjuan H. Experimental and numerical investigations into seismic performance of timber-steel hybrid structure with supplemental dampers. Engineering Structures 151 (2017) 33–43
[16] Hatletveit M. Mechanical assessment of a steel dissipating system for RC buildings retrofitting with CLT panels. Master thesis, 2020. Norwegian University of Life Sciences
[17] Golondrino JC, MacRae GA, Chase JG, Rodgers GW. Behaviour of Asymmetrical Friction Connections using different shim materials. In: 2012 NZSEE Conf.; 2012. p. 1–7.
Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21
Volume Seismic analysis and retrofit, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.151
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?