Abstract

Field and laboratory testing was carried out for the construction of a 100 m long cable stayed bridge situated in the foothills of the Alps in the south of Germany, a region dominated by deep post-glacial, fine-grained sediments. Due to the sensitivity and associated challenges with retrieving undisturbed soil samples in situ tests and their evaluation proved to be essential for the geotechnical design of the bridge foundation. This contribution focuses on the analytical and numerical interpretation of Cone Pressuremeter Tests (CPM). The non-linear 𝐺-𝛾 relationship and undrained shear strength (using both the limit pressure and reverse plasticity contraction analysis) were determined analytically. Numerical investigations were carried out as verification using both the Finite Element method (FEM) using both 1D (cavity expansion) and 2D simulations (where the penetration of the probe was modelled) as well as using the Finite Difference (FD) method. 2D simulations demonstrated that the assumption of the cylindrical cavity expansion is appropriate for modelling the CPM tests. The interpreted undrained shear strength showed good agreement with other field tests, including CPTu, vane shear (FVT) and seismic cone penetration (SCPT) tests, as well as with the results of laboratory tests on disturbed samples. CPM tests with strain rate jumps were conducted during pressuremeter expansion, wherewith it was possible to quantify the viscous response of the soil. Based on the holistic interpretation of the field and laboratory results involving both numerical simulations and analytical methods the parameters for the material model Viscohypoplasticity were calibrated.

Full Paper

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 10/06/24
Submitted on 10/06/24

Volume Numerical modelling of in-situ tests, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.220
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?