Numerical Modelling of the Seismic Performance of Romanian Traditional Timber-Framed Buildings

Abstract

Traditional architecture made of timber-framed masonry (TFM) system is widespread around the world and has already been recognized as a unique cultural heritage to be preserved. These structures have shown a good seismic performance compared to other typologies because their configuration and construction details were constantly updated as soon as the builders addressed the causes of damage mechanisms when earthquakes occurred. Regarding this typology, Romanian TFM structures can be considered a representative example also because they experienced several seismic events showing their good earthquake-resistance. Although these buildings are still constructed and inhabited nowadays, no recommendation is provided in the Romanian building code and its structural behaviour is not properly characterized yet. Bearing in mind that the building’s global response depends on many parameters such as the performance of its structural elements and their interaction, the calibration of shear walls is crucial to define the non-linear behaviour under cyclic loading. A simplified modelling strategy was chosen to simulate TFM wall response consisting of an equivalent frame with linear elastic elements and non-linearities lumped at the joints by using OpenSees. After calibrating the wall response according to the experimental campaign performed at Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, the panel was adapted to model a representative Romanian TFM building whose dynamic properties were evaluated by eigenvalue analysis and their potential calibration is proposed based on the ambient vibration tests.

Full document

References

[1] Bianco, A. La casa baraccata: guida al progetto e al cantiere di restauro. Ginevra Bentivoglio EditoriA, Roma, (2010).

[2] Gülkan, P. and Langenbach, R. The earthquake resistance of traditional timber and masonry dwellings in Turkey. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper no. 2297 (2004).

[3] Pavel, F., Vacareanu, R., Douglas, J., Radulian, M., Cioflan, C. and Barbat, A. An updated probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania and comparison with the approach and outcomes of the SHARE Project. Pure and Applied Geophysics (2016) 173:1881–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1223-6.

[4] Duțu, A., Dima, D. I. and Bulimar, E. G. Materials and techniques for traditional Romanian residential houses. 3rd International Conference on PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL CONTRUCTIONS (2017).

[5] Dutu, A., Niste, M., Spatarelu, I., Dima, D. I. and Kishiki, S. Seismic evaluation of Romanian traditional buildings with timber frame and mud masonry infills by in-plane static cyclic tests. Engineering Structures (2018) 167:655–670.

[6] Dutu, A., Niste, M. and Spatarelu, I. In-plane static cyclic tests on traditional Romanian houses ’ walls. 16th Europeand Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2018).

[7] Aldea A., Dutu A., Demetriu S. and Dima D.I. Dynamic properties identification for a timber framed masonry house. Revista Constructii (under review).

[8] Parisse, F. Numerical modelling of the seismic performance of romanian traditional timber-framed buildings. University of Minho (2019). http://hdl.handle.net/1822/62517

[9] Ruggieri, N. An Italian anti-seismic system of the 18th century decay, failure modes and conservation principles. International Journal of Conservation Science (2016), 7:827– 838.

[10] Dima, D. I. and Dutu, A. Traditional buildings with timber frame and various infills in Romania. Proceedings of the WCTE 2016 (World Conference on Timber Engineering) (2016).

[11] Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, Berkeley: University of California (2006).

[12] Lukic, R., Poletti, E., Rodrigues, H. and Vasconcelos, G. Numerical modelling of the cyclic behavior of timber-framed structures. Engineering Structures (2018), 165: 210– 221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.039.

[13] Dutu, A., Niste, M., Spatarelu, I., Dima, D. I. TFMRO project (Seismic evaluation of Romanian traditional residential buildings). Scientific Report, Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest (2017). http://tfmro.utcb.ro/.

[14] Sakata, H., Yamazaki, Y. and Ohashi, Y. A study on moment resisting behavior of mortise-tenon joint with dowel or split wedge. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE) (2012).

[15] Italian Building Code. Circolare 21 gennaio 2019 n. 7 C.S.LL.PP. Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’aggiornamento delle “Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni” di cui al D.M. 17/01/2018. Suppl. ord. alla G.U. n. 35 del 11/2/19, (2019).