The history of the South African construction industry dates as far back as the Castle of Good Hope (1666), Slave Lodge (1679), Robben Island (1700), Union Buildings (1913), memorials and cathedrals, among many others. These structures represent the political, slavery, liberation and religious history of South Africa and its development throughout the years, while also contributing towards economic growth through tourism. Historical buildings stand out from the rest of the modern constructions as they portray marvellous architectural designs and unique materials used for their construction. However, due to ageing and environmental conditions, they often show critical signs of deterioration, which threaten the existence of some. In attempts to rescue these national treasures, the use of Portland cement, which is considered incompatible with the original materials, has become a common practice, not only in South Africa but abroad. To avoid disparity in materials during repair of historic structures, original material characterization is therefore recommended. This paper investigates the effects of Portland cement used on the repairs of historical masonries of the Castle of Good Hope, Cape Town and buildings on Robben Island, in South Africa. The mortar samples were collected from the Castle and analyzed using the techniques such as the visual investigation, cohesion test, microscopic and titration test. It is observed that the original lime- based mortars are not compatible with the Portland cement produced mortars. It was evident on the masonry, as the repairs are repelling from the original surfaces on these two structures.
[1] Feilden, B. M. Conservation of Historic Buildings. 3rd edition, Architectural press, Elsevier (2003).
[2] Marini, A., Cominelli, S., Zanotti, C. and Giuriani, E. Improved natural hydraulic lime mortar slab for compatible retrofit of wooden floors in historical buildings. Construction and Building Materials (2018) 158: 801 – 813.
[3] Gleize, P. J. P., Motta, E. V., Silva, D. A. and Roman, H. R. Characterization of historical mortars from Santa Catarina (Brazil). Cement and Concrete Composites (2009) 31: 342– 346.
[4] Mwasinga, B. Interview with SAHRA Built Environment Manager on 26 July 2018, Cape Town; South Africa (2018).
[5] Apostolopoulou, M., Aggelakopoulou, E., Siouta, L., Bakolas, A., Douvika, M., Asteris, P. G. and Moropoulou, A. A methodological approach for the selection of compatible and performable restoration mortars in seismic hazard areas. Construction and Building Materials (2017) 155: 1–14.
[6] Conditional Assessment of Buildings on Robben Island: Outline Description of Material Testing Required. 2018. Cape Town, South Africa. Available at: https://sahris.sahra.org.za (accessed in March 2019).
[7] Balksten, K. Understanding Historic Mortars and their Variations – a Condition for Performing Restorations with Traditional Materials. 2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop 22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic (2010).
[8] Hormes, J., Diekamp, A., Klysubund, W., Bovenkamp, G. L. and Börste, N. The characterization of historic mortars: A comparison between powder diffraction and synchrotron radiation-based X-ray absorption and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Microchemical Journal (2016) 125: 190–195.
[9] Palomo, A., Blanco-Varela, M. T., Martinez-Ramirez, S., Puertas F. and Fortes, C. Historic Mortars: Characterization and Durability. New Tendencies for Research (2014).
[10] Isebaert, A., Van Parys, L. and Cnudde, V. Composition and compatibility requirements of mineral repair mortars for stone – A review. Construction and Building Materials, (2014) 59: 39–50.
[11] Bertolini, L., Carsana, M., Gastaldi, M., Lollini, F. and Redaelli, E. Binder characterisation of mortars used at different ages in the San Lorenzo church in Milan. Material Characterization (2013) 80: 9-20.
[12] Cizer, Ö., Schueremans, L., Serre, G., Janssens, E. and Van Balen, K. Assessment of the Compatibility of Repair Mortars in Restoration Projects. Advanced Materials Research, (2010) 133-134: 1071-1076.
[13] Deshpande, U. L. Repair, restoration and strengthening of building. International Journal of I Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology (2017) 4(3): 121 - 124.
[14] Gulzar, S., Chaudhry, M. N., Burg J. P. and Saeed S. A. Characteristics of Ancient Mortars and Plasters from the Archaeological Site of Akbari-Serai (Pakistan). Journal of Chemistry (2013) 25(15): 8484-8488.
[15] Castle of Good Hope. 2018. Available at https://castleofgoodhope.co.za (accessed in September 2018).
[16] Gilbert, C. The Castle of Good Hope: An Examination of Controversies and Conflicting Perceptions – A Case Study in Public History. An Honours degree thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa (1994).
[17] Sky view of the Castle of Good Hope. 2019. Available at: https://blog.parkinn.com (accessed in January 2020)
[18] Ngoma, A. M. K. Characterisation and Consolidation of Historical Lime Mortars in Cultural Heritage Buildings and Associated Structures in East Africa. PhD thesis, University of Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania (2009).
[19] Groot, C.J.W.P, Ashall, G.J., Hughes, J.J. and Bartos, P.J.M. Characterisation of old mortars with respect to their repair. RILEM TC 167-COM: State of the art Report (2004).
[20] Middendorf, B., Hughes, H., Callebaut, K., Baronio, G. and Papayianni, I. Investigation Methods for the Characterisation of Historic Mortars, Part 2: Chemical Characterisation. Materials and Structures (2005) 38: 771-780.
[21] Teutonico, J. M. ICCROM Arc laboratory manual for architectural conservators. Rome, Italy, 1988.
[22] Brosnan, D. A. Characterization and Degradation of Masonry Mortar in Historic Brick Structures. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Journal of Structures, volume 2014, Article ID: 85987 (2014), pp. 1-7.
[23] Loke, M.E., Kumar, P. and Haldenwang, R. Physical characterization of heritage mortars for restoration interventions. IEEE 10th International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies (ICMIMT 2019), Cape Town: South Africa, 20- 22 January 2020 (Presented).
Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21
Volume Inspection methods, non-destructive techniques and laboratory testing, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.047
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?