Cultural Heritage Exposed to Natural Hazards: the Case Study of the Convent of San Domenico in Maiori

Abstract

Nowadays it is widely recognized that structural interventions on cultural heritage buildings shall comply with the minimum intervention principle. The main goal is to enhance the structural capacity respecting, at the same time, the authenticity of the monument. As such, the correct interpretation of the current damage is a first fundamental step in the design of an efficient structural intervention. Within this framework, the paper presents the results of an in depth investigation carried out to assess the structural capacity of a complex monument affected by several deficiencies. The case study is the convent of Saint Domenico, a seventeenth century’s masonry structure, belonging to the traditional architectural typology of the court building. The building is located in Maiori, a small town in the Amalfi Coast (Italy), included in the UNESCO World Heritage List since 1997 for its great cultural and naturalistic interest. The structure was abandoned during the 80s, and currently presents an extensive and diffuse crack pattern that is the consequence of several causes such as: the natural aging of material, the lack of maintenance, the modifications occurred during the centuries, the seismic events occurred in the past and the poor quality of the foundation soil. In this paper, starting from the knowledge acquisition path of the whole Convent, a special focus on the structural behavior of the East wing is provided. A numerical model of a cross section of the wing has been developed and analyzed considering the effects of lateral loads and settlements. The numerical analyses are carried out using LiaBlock_3D, an in-house software tool for the limit equilibrium analysis of rigid block assemblages. Results of the analyses are discussed in details and a comparison with the actual crack pattern of the structure is provided as well.

Full document

References

[1] UNESCO, «Decision report: Inscription: The Costiera Amalfitana (Italy). CONF 208 VIII.C.», 1997.

[2] R. Landolfo et al., «PERICLES Case studies: the Convent of S. Domenico in Maiori», 2020.

[3] F. P. A. Portioli, «Rigid block modelling of historic masonry structures using mathematical programming: a unified formulation for non-linear time history, static pushover and limit equilibrium analysis», Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 18, n. 1, pagg. 211–239, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10518-019-00722-0.

[4] L. Cascini, R. Gagliardo, e F. Portioli, «LiABlock_3D: A Software Tool for Collapse Mechanism Analysis of Historic Masonry Structures», International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2018, doi: 10.1080/15583058.2018.1509155.

[5] P. Zampieri, M. Amoroso, e C. Pellegrino, «The masonry buttressed arch on spreading support», Structures, vol. 20, pagg. 226–236, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.03.008.

[6] A. Tralli, A. Chiozzi, N. Grillanda, e G. Milani, «Masonry structures in the presence of foundation settlements and unilateral contact problems», International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 191–192, pagg. 187–201, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.12.005.

[7] F. Portioli e C. Lucrezia, «Assessment of masonry structures subjected to foundation settlements using rigid block limit analysis», Engineering Structures, vol. 113, pagg. 347–361, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.002.

[8] T. T. Bui, A. Limam, V. Sarhosis, e M. Hjiaj, «Discrete element modelling of the in- plane and out-of-plane behaviour of dry-joint masonry wall constructions», Engineering Structures, vol. 136, pagg. 277–294, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.020.

[9] R. Landolfo et al., «Rigid block and finite element analysis of settlement-induced failure mechanisms in historic masonry wall panels», Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, vol. 14, pagg. 517–533, 2020, doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.51.39.

[10] G. De Felice e M. Malena, «Failure pattern prediction in masonry», Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, vol. 14, n. 5, pagg. 663–682, dic. 2019, doi: 10.2140/jomms.2019.14.663.

[11] A. M. D’Altri, S. D. Miranda, G. Castellazzi, V. Sarhosis, J. Hudson, e D. Theodossopoulos, «Historic Barrel Vaults Undergoing Differential Settlements», International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 0, n. 0, pagg. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15583058.2019.1596332.

[12] C. Alessandri, M. Garutti, V. Mallardo, e G. Milani, «Crack Patterns Induced by Foundation Settlements: Integrated Analysis on a Renaissance Masonry Palace in Italy», International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 9, n. 2, pagg. 111–129, 2015, doi: 10.1080/15583058.2014.951795.

[13] S. Galassi, G. Misseri, L. Rovero, e G. Tempesta, «Failure modes prediction of masonry voussoir arches on moving supports», Engineering Structures, vol. 173, pagg. 706–717, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.015.

[14] V. Acary e M. Jean, «Numerical modeling of three dimensional divided structures by the Non Smooth Contact dynamics method: Application to masonry structures», presentato al The Fifth international Conference on Computational Structures Technology 2000, set. 2000, pagg. 211–221, Consultato: apr. 30, 2020.

[15] C. Tarantino, «Beni culturali espsoti ai pericoli naturali. Il caso studio dell’ex Convento di San Domenico a Maiori», University of Naples Federico II, 2018.