Abstract

Obtaining RNA-seq measurements involves a complex data analytical process with a large number of competing algorithms as options. There is much debate about which of these methods provides the best approach. Unfortunately, it is currently difficult to evaluate their performance due in part to a lack of sensitive assessment metrics. We present a series of statistical summaries and plots to evaluate the performance in terms of specificity and sensitivity, available as a R/Bioconductor package (http://bioconductor.org/packages/rnaseqcomp). Using two independent datasets, we assessed seven competing pipelines. Performance was generally poor, with two methods clearly underperforming and RSEM slightly outperforming the rest. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Document type: Article

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1/fulltext.html,
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1 under the license cc-by
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27107712,
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1,
https://paperity.org/p/76211203/a-benchmark-for-rna-seq-quantification-pipelines,
http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27107712,
https://core.ac.uk/display/33028458,
https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/26860249,
https://jhu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/a-benchmark-for-rna-seq-quantification-pipelines,
https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/27924,
http://repository.cshl.edu/id/eprint/32618,
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27107712,
https://publications.hse.ru/en/articles/202280175,
http://genomebiology.com/content/pdf/s13059-016-0940-1.pdf,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2340210804 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



DOIS: 10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1 10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2016

Volume 2016, 2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?