Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?

Abstract

  How Uber affects public transit ridership is a relevant policy question facing cities worldwide. Theoretically, Uber’s effect on transit is ambiguous: while Uber is an alternative mode of travel, it can also increase the reach and flexibility of public transit’s fixed-route, fixed-schedule service. We estimate the effect of Uber on public transit ridership using a difference-in-differences design that exploits variation across U.S. metropolitan areas in both the intensity of Uber penetration and the timing of Uber entry. We find that Uber is a complement for the average transit agency, increasing ridership by five percent after two years. This average effect masks considerable heterogeneity, with Uber increasing ridership more in larger cities and for smaller transit agencies.

Document type: Article

Full document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2018.09.003

• https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/public/workingPapers/tecipa-585.pdf

• https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0094119018300731?httpAccept=text/xml,

https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0094119018300731?httpAccept=text/plain,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2018.09.003 under the license https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

• https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/econ_facpubs/940,

https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1939&context=econ_facpubs under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094119018300731,

https://ideas.repec.org/p/tor/tecipa/tecipa-585.html,

https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/econ_facpubs/940,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2747193592