With the rapid evolution of o↵shore wind energy, engineering tools are crucial
to catalyze technological developments and increase their maturity, therefore leading to lower costs. Complex turbine-turbine interactions require a good knowledge of the physics of the flow on, around and down/upstream of each turbine, which can be provided using high-fidelity CFD simulations. Turbulence models play a critical role on this matter and an adequate balance between accuracy and computational e↵ort is necessary. While RANS approaches are quite e cient, LES should provide the most accurate result. Yet, even nowadays, LES blade-resolved simulations are still computationally prohibitive for industrial purposes. A middle-ground exists in SRS formulations, such as hybrid ones as DDES, or bridging ones such as PANS. In the present work emphasis is placed on PANS, since numerical and modelling errors can be studied and quantified independently, as opposite to other SRS approaches. Using as a benchmark the UNAFLOWwindturbine, it is found that traditional RANS and DDES turbulence formulations are able to predict integral forces, but partially fail in capturing wake mixing. Nevertheless, PANS, while enabling the user to select the ratio of turbulent quantities modelled, is not able to properly capture the integral forces due to premature separation in the blades. Several causes are discussed, including insu cient mesh refinement in the near-wall region and lack of turbulent content of the numerical inlet, preventing laminar to turbulent flow transition. Future work should focus on inlet synthetic turbulence generation, in line with existent literature, in order to improve the shortcomings faced in properly resolving the near-wall flow.
Published on 23/10/24
Submitted on 23/10/24
Volume 20 Years of Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations: Progress, Challenges, and Future, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/eccomas.2024.001
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?