Patio as a Structural Invariant. Buildings with Patio Facing Adaptive Reuse in Barcelona

Abstract

Certain architectural structures have the ability to persist over time when a building undergoes a change of use. This is the case of patios, according to the conclusions of a study focused on the reused buildings of Barcelona recently developed. The survey of this architectural element should enable us to better understand the behaviour of these buildings. If we define the open-air inner courtyard of a building as a patio, this study is especially interested in those who have the capacity to organize spaces, systematize circulations — along with stairs and corridors — and configure the building as a whole. This set of structuring patios particularly applies in a dense city like Barcelona because their position and size also provide liveability to interior rooms. In light of these qualities, such patios can be regarded as an essential piece of both the formal and the bearing structure of a building. The location and attributes of these patios can be associated with the potential for adaptive reuse: they can help achieve a lower impact on the architectural and formal structure of a renovated building, when used appropriately. Hence the patio can be seen as an indicator of how a new programme adapts to the existing support. 171 out of 565 buildings documented and analysed in Barcelona — a thirty percent of the overall — have at least one patio of a kind whose characteristics have outlived one or more renovation processes. The percentage rises to 50% in Ciutat Vella and Eixample districts, where density and architectural typology make them particularly relevant. Buildings with patios match different uses and periods from the 11th to the 20th century. In spite of the expected differences, the studio draws conclusions on the understanding of material transformations and changes of use they have undergone. In short, with regard to buildings included in this category — both heritage and common ones — this paper helps verify the hypothesis that the very existence of a patio is responsible for the persistence of the internal arrangement and structure and must be carefully considered in future interventions when addressed to extend the life-cycle of a building.

Full document

References

[1] Monteys, X., Mària, M., Fuertes, P., Sauquet, R., & Salvadó, N. (2018) Atlas del aprovechamiento arquitectónico. Estudio crítico de los edificios reutilizados en Barcelona. Barcelona: MINECO, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.

[2] Austin, R. L., Woodcock, D. G., Steward, W. C., & Forrester R. A. (1988). Adative Reuse: Issues and Case Studies in Building Preservation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

[3] Ball, R. (1999). Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant industrial buildings. Building Research & Information, 27(3), 140-148.

[4] Bon R., Hutchinson K. (2000). Sustainable construction: some economic challenges. Building Research and Information, 28(5/6), 310-4.

[5] Douglas, J. (2006). Building Adaptation, 2nd ed., Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann.

[6] Bullen, P. A. (2007). Adaptive reuse and sustainibility of commercial buildings. Facilities, 25, 20-31.

[7] Langston, C. A. (2008). The sustainability implications of building adaptive reuse. In CRIOCM 2008 International Research Symposium. Retrieved January 21, 2019 from https://works.bepress.com/craig_langston/1/

[8] Rueda, S. (2018). Carta para el diseño de nuevos desarrollos urbanos y regeneración de los existentes. Congreso Post-Habitat III. Retrieved December 15, 2018 from Barcelona.http://www.cartaurbanismoecosistemico.com/

[9] Díaz Recasens, G. (1992). Recurrencia y herencia del patio en el movimiento moderno. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.

[10] Yung, E. H., & Chan, E. H. (2012) Implementation Challenges to the Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings. Towards the Goals of Sustainable, Low Carbon Cities. Habitat international, 36(3), 352-361.