The seismic events occurred in Italy in the last decay (L’Aquila 2009, Emilia 2012, Central Italy Earthquakes 2016/2017) have caused the collapse of numerous historical buildings and monuments with loss of life and irreversible damages to the cultural heritage. An effective seismic prevention would avoid, or delay, the most frequent collapse mechanisms. However, it requires a correct interpretation of the structural mechanical behavior. With regard to the traditional masonry buildings, this issue presents a high level of complexity due to the uncertainties related to the materials and the constructive techniques. Furthermore, historic buildings are often the result of several modifications that induce significant structural irregularities. A possible analysis strategy is provided by a discrete macro-element modelling (DMEM) approach which is able to simulate the global behavior of traditional fabrics, if supported by an adequate level of historic, geometrical, constructive and structural knowledge. In this paper a multidisciplinary procedure is applied to the church of S. Sebastiano in Regalbuto (Italy), considered as case study. This procedure is composed of three steps: the knowledge phase in which the constructive apparatus and the static schemes are identified, the modelling phase and the assessment phase in which the current safety level of the building and possible interventions that would be compatible with its cultural instance, are individuated. According to the followed procedure, different scenarios of intervention, characterized by increasing levels of benefit and invasiveness, are considered. For each scenario, non-linear static push-over analyses are performed, to evaluate the benefits and identify the structural critical issues, useful to individuate the next scenario. The obtained results are presented and discussed both in terms of capacity curves and failure mechanisms.
[1] Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Design Code EN 1998-3, 2005.
[2] NTC 2008, Decreto Ministeriale 14/1/2008: Norme tecniche per le costruzioni., Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportations, 2008.
[3] Borri A., Manuale delle murature storiche, Vol. I., D.E.I. Editrice, (2011).
[4] Cannizzaro, F., Pantò, B., Caddemi, S. and Caliò. I., A Discrete Macro-Element Method (DMEM) for the nonlinear structural assessment of masonry arches. Eng. Struct. (2018) 168:243–56.
[5] Caddemi, S., Caliò, I., Cannizzaro, F. and Pantò, B., New frontiers on seismic modeling of masonry structures. Frontiers in Built Environment (2017) 3, art. no. 39.
[6] Pantò, B., Cannizzaro, F., Caddemi, S. and Caliò, I., 3D macro-element modelling approach for seismic assessment of historical masonry churches. Advances in Engineering Software (2016) 97:40-59.
[7] Pantò, B., Giresini, L., Sassu, M. and Caliò, I., Non-linear modeling of masonry churches through a discrete macro-element approach. Earthquake and Structures (2017) 12 (2):223-236.
[8] Sanpaolesi P., Discorso sulla metodologia generale del restauro dei monumenti, Edam, (1973), pp. 111-118.
[9] Caliò, I., Marletta M., Pantò, B., A new discrete element model for the evaluation of the seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry buildings. Eng Struct (2012) 40:237–338.
[10] Pantò, B., Cannizzaro, F., Caliò, I. and Lourenço PB. Numerical and experimental validation of a 3D macro-model for the in-plane and out-of-plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry walls. Int J Architect Heritage (2017).
[11] Calió, I., Cannizzaro, F., and Marletta, M., A discrete element for modeling masonry vaults. Adv. Mater. Res. (2010)133-134:447–452.
[12] Pantò, B., Cannizzaro, F., Caddemi, S., Caliò, I., Chácara, C. and Lourenço, PB., Nonlinear modelling of curved masonry structures after seismic retrofit through FRP reinforcing. Buildings (2017) 7:79.
[13] HiStrA (Historical Structure Analysis) Release 17.2.3,” ed. Catania, (2015).
[14] Lo Faro A., Contrafatto L., Di Stefano A. L’Aquila’s single nave churches and 2009’s earthquake: knowledge, modeling, intervention. In: Di Giuseppe E. et al. (Eds.): ColloquiA.Te 2017. Demolition or Recostruction?, EdicomEdizioni, (2017), pp. 263-274.
Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21
Volume Interdisciplinary projects and case studies, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.060
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?