Adana-Tepebağ settlement is located in the south-east part of the Anatolia close to the Mediterranean Sea. This settlement is located in the center of the city, composed of unique architectural heritage with different plan typologies of historical structures, used of varied materials such as timber, brick, and stone. Traditional timber structural systems are widely used in this area. In this research, proposing a consolidation method for traditional timber structures with modern prefabricated systems in the frame of technological prefabrication criteria. Such as several joint details, lifting and storage properties, and fabrication state of the construction element and minimum waste ideal of the timber material [2]. This research is done in a historical settlement in Adana-Tepebağ. The state of the timber structures is in a high damaged condition as a result of the lack of maintenance in an extended period. Consequently, there is a need for a consolidation method for the maintenance of historical structures in that area. These analyzing criteria are applied to a historical timber structure in that settlement on a case study for showing the progress of this methodological approach. The progress of the methodology is composed of three main steps; 1-The damage and corrosion analysis of skeleton timber structure. 2-The decision method within the frame of technological prefabrication criteria of modern timber prefabricated elements on the damaged parts of this structure. 3-Data’s, which are collected from the previous two stages, are analyzed and compared. This methodological approach expected to be a rational decision method for the consolidation of historical structures in the Tepebağ settlement. Significantly partly damaged timber structures consolidation is very critical in the frame of budget and the authenticity of the building.
[1] Adana Endowment office, Documentation related to case study inventory number:152, (2016).
[2] Apak, K. Ahşap strüktürel sistem seçim modeli ve geleneksel Kıyıköy konutları üzerinde değerlendirilmesi – Decision methodology of timber structural system and evaluation on Kıyıköy settlement. PhD Thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, (2009).
[3] Croatto, G., Turrini U. Restoration of historical timber structures -Criteria, innovative solutions and case studies, Seminario Intervir em construçoes existentes de madeira, (2014).
[4] Çelik, Ç. XIX. yy’dan günümüze Adana’da konut mimarisinin gelişimi-The evaluation of Adana’s dwelling architecture from XIXth century till today, Ç.Ü. Master Thesis (1999).
[5] Durukan, İ., Karaman, F., Saban, D., Erman, O. Adana, Inventory of urban cultural heritage (2004-2005). TÜBA-KED 7/ (2009).
[6] Eldem, S.H. Türk evi-Turkish house, TAÇ Vakfı Yayınları, (1987).
[7] Halaçoğlu, Y. Adana tarihçesi, Adana köprü başı - History of Adana, Adana köprü başı, Y.K.Y. Yay, (2000), s.11-12.
[8] Herzog, T., Natterer, J., Schweitzer, R., Volz, M., Winter, W. Timber construction manual, Birkhauser, (2004).
[9] ICOMOS International Wood Committee. Principles for the conservation of wooden built heritage, Adopted by ICOMOS at the 19th General Assembly in Delhi, India, (2017).
[10] Kafesçioğlu, R. Kuzey – Batı Anadolu’da ahşap ev yapıları – Timber houses in north-west Anatolia, İ.T.Ü., (1955).
[11] Ökesli, S.D. Herman Jansen’s planning principles and his urban legacy in Adana, Metu JFA, (2009), pp.45-67
[12] Özmen, Ö., Geleneksel Adana evleri, Adana köprü başı – Traditional Adana houses, Adana köprü başı, Y.K.Y. Yay, (2000).
[13] Umar, N. Photography inventory related to Adana-Tepebağ, (2010).
Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21
Volume Repair and strengthening strategies and techniques, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.126
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?