Evaluating Tradeoff between Environmental Impact and Operational Costs for Enroute Air Traffic

Abstract

The rapid growth of air traffic has drawn attention to aircraft-induced environmental impact. Aviation operations affect the environment mainly through the release of emissions and by the formation of contrails. Recent research has shown that altering aircraft cruise altitudes can reduce aviation environmental impact by reducing Absolute Global Temperature Change Potential, a climate assessment metric that adapts a linear system for modeling the global temperature response to aviation emissions and contrails. However, these methods will increase fuel consumption that leads to higher operational costs imposed on airlines resulting in reluctance to adopt a new routing strategy. This paper evaluates the tradeoff between environmental impact reduction and the corresponding added operational costs for enroute air traffic. The concept of social cost of carbon and the carbon auction price from California’s recent cap-and-trade system were used to provide estimates and a methodology to evaluate environmental costs for carbon dioxide emissions and contrail formations. Depending on the specific environmental policy, the strategy is considered favorable when the reduction in environmental costs exceeds the increase in operational costs. The results show how the net environmental benefit varies with different decision-making time horizons, different carbon and fuel costs, and different days. The study provides guidance towards the development of the environmental reduction strategies.

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9bfa/fb11385eef179d48d17e3412080200a1e260.pdf

• http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2014-1464,

http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-1464

• https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180004158,

https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2014-1464,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2327153306