Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
During the so‐called vibro‐penetration test (VPT), a vertical harmonic excitation force drives a rod with a conical tip into the ground. For the evaluation of the VPT resistance, an energy‐corrected number of vibration cycles Nz10 for 0.10 m penetration is used. In order to determine Nz10, the dynamic penetration resistance, the tip and shaft resistance, the tip acceleration, and the depth of the penetrometer tip are continuously recorded and processed according to a mechanical vibro-penetration model. Calibration chamber tests, field tests, and Finite Element Analyses, which were carried out to validate the assumed penetration mechanism and to investigate the influence of the state variables (density and effective stresses) and the machine parameters (static moment, frequency, and static load) on the penetration resistance. As the force and displacement of the penetrometer are determined at the tip, an equivalent spring stiffness, which is correlated with the soil stiffness, can be calculated over the driving depth. Since vibro‐penetration resistance is closely related to the soil behavior under cyclic shearing, the VPT should be more appropriate than monotonic tests to characterize the ground response to repeated dynamic and alternating loading, e.g. pile drivability, ground compaction, and soil liquefaction susceptibility. Compared with the cone-penetration test (CPT), the VPT equipment is much lighter, the execution time is shorter, and in‐situ investigations of medium-dense to dense cohesionless soils at large depths are feasible. In this contribution, VPT and CPT are used to investigate the effect of blasting compaction in very loose dumps from opencast mines in Lusatia, Brandenburg, Germany. It is concluded that the VPT results are reproducible. In addition, Nz10 shows a clear correlation with the state variables and the VPT records before and after blasting compares well with the results of CPT.
 
During the so‐called vibro‐penetration test (VPT), a vertical harmonic excitation force drives a rod with a conical tip into the ground. For the evaluation of the VPT resistance, an energy‐corrected number of vibration cycles Nz10 for 0.10 m penetration is used. In order to determine Nz10, the dynamic penetration resistance, the tip and shaft resistance, the tip acceleration, and the depth of the penetrometer tip are continuously recorded and processed according to a mechanical vibro-penetration model. Calibration chamber tests, field tests, and Finite Element Analyses, which were carried out to validate the assumed penetration mechanism and to investigate the influence of the state variables (density and effective stresses) and the machine parameters (static moment, frequency, and static load) on the penetration resistance. As the force and displacement of the penetrometer are determined at the tip, an equivalent spring stiffness, which is correlated with the soil stiffness, can be calculated over the driving depth. Since vibro‐penetration resistance is closely related to the soil behavior under cyclic shearing, the VPT should be more appropriate than monotonic tests to characterize the ground response to repeated dynamic and alternating loading, e.g. pile drivability, ground compaction, and soil liquefaction susceptibility. Compared with the cone-penetration test (CPT), the VPT equipment is much lighter, the execution time is shorter, and in‐situ investigations of medium-dense to dense cohesionless soils at large depths are feasible. In this contribution, VPT and CPT are used to investigate the effect of blasting compaction in very loose dumps from opencast mines in Lusatia, Brandenburg, Germany. It is concluded that the VPT results are reproducible. In addition, Nz10 shows a clear correlation with the state variables and the VPT records before and after blasting compares well with the results of CPT.
 +
 +
== Full Paper ==
 +
<pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_477619935218.pdf</pdf>

Revision as of 10:36, 7 June 2024

Abstract

During the so‐called vibro‐penetration test (VPT), a vertical harmonic excitation force drives a rod with a conical tip into the ground. For the evaluation of the VPT resistance, an energy‐corrected number of vibration cycles Nz10 for 0.10 m penetration is used. In order to determine Nz10, the dynamic penetration resistance, the tip and shaft resistance, the tip acceleration, and the depth of the penetrometer tip are continuously recorded and processed according to a mechanical vibro-penetration model. Calibration chamber tests, field tests, and Finite Element Analyses, which were carried out to validate the assumed penetration mechanism and to investigate the influence of the state variables (density and effective stresses) and the machine parameters (static moment, frequency, and static load) on the penetration resistance. As the force and displacement of the penetrometer are determined at the tip, an equivalent spring stiffness, which is correlated with the soil stiffness, can be calculated over the driving depth. Since vibro‐penetration resistance is closely related to the soil behavior under cyclic shearing, the VPT should be more appropriate than monotonic tests to characterize the ground response to repeated dynamic and alternating loading, e.g. pile drivability, ground compaction, and soil liquefaction susceptibility. Compared with the cone-penetration test (CPT), the VPT equipment is much lighter, the execution time is shorter, and in‐situ investigations of medium-dense to dense cohesionless soils at large depths are feasible. In this contribution, VPT and CPT are used to investigate the effect of blasting compaction in very loose dumps from opencast mines in Lusatia, Brandenburg, Germany. It is concluded that the VPT results are reproducible. In addition, Nz10 shows a clear correlation with the state variables and the VPT records before and after blasting compares well with the results of CPT.

Full Paper

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 07/06/24
Submitted on 07/06/24

Volume Dynamic penetrometers for soil characterization, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.218
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?