Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
The demand for thermal site characterization has risen noticeably in the past decade, particularly for design of geothermal energy solutions and for design of in-ground power cable networks. The results of thermal characterization of a site are typically incorporated in a ground model based on environmental, geological, geophysical and geotechnical geodata.  This paper compares in-situ test methods for thermal site characterization of soil. The comparison considers method applicability, deployment method, maximum test depth, test duration and uncertainty of results. A distinction is made between three categories of in-situ tests: (1) in-situ tests using active heat generation, (2) in-situ tests using passive heat generation and (3) in-situ tests with no specific thermal data acquisition
 
The demand for thermal site characterization has risen noticeably in the past decade, particularly for design of geothermal energy solutions and for design of in-ground power cable networks. The results of thermal characterization of a site are typically incorporated in a ground model based on environmental, geological, geophysical and geotechnical geodata.  This paper compares in-situ test methods for thermal site characterization of soil. The comparison considers method applicability, deployment method, maximum test depth, test duration and uncertainty of results. A distinction is made between three categories of in-situ tests: (1) in-situ tests using active heat generation, (2) in-situ tests using passive heat generation and (3) in-situ tests with no specific thermal data acquisition
 +
 +
== Full Paper ==
 +
<pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_13791218713.pdf</pdf>

Revision as of 15:06, 6 June 2024

Abstract

The demand for thermal site characterization has risen noticeably in the past decade, particularly for design of geothermal energy solutions and for design of in-ground power cable networks. The results of thermal characterization of a site are typically incorporated in a ground model based on environmental, geological, geophysical and geotechnical geodata. This paper compares in-situ test methods for thermal site characterization of soil. The comparison considers method applicability, deployment method, maximum test depth, test duration and uncertainty of results. A distinction is made between three categories of in-situ tests: (1) in-situ tests using active heat generation, (2) in-situ tests using passive heat generation and (3) in-situ tests with no specific thermal data acquisition

Full Paper

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 06/06/24
Submitted on 06/06/24

Volume Characterization for thermo-hydraulic problems, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.013
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?