Revision as of 13:44, 6 June 2024

Abstract

Across several sectors including medicine and agriculture and the extractive industries, availability of early information from screening delivers disproportionate downstream benefit to key stakeholders. With the aim of reducing uncertainty to manage geo-risks in the subsurface, site characterisation for geotechnical engineering is mainly executed following a project owner’s final investment decision (FID) and continues to rely predominantly on conventional investigation techniques that inform both the geotechnical design and construction phases of infrastructure development. However, historical project performance of capital works developments tells us that geo-risks continue to play a role in unwanted engineering business outcomes in the form of schedule and cost overrun associated with earlier cost underestimation. Fundamentally, we recognise that the construction sector would benefit from earlier, faster, and better representation of the subsurface in the top 50 m to 100 m using techniques with a light footprint and low permitting requirements at the earliest stages of project development. We describe an example early-phase screening solution based on adapted ambient noise tomography. Screening at feasibility and planning phases can help to mitigate the impact of human bias arising from epistemic uncertainty in the subsurface and can improve early decision-making where the opportunity to influence project outcome is greatest and at lowest cost. Screening coupled with an optimised conventional intrusive investigation during the execution phase can complete the information set for full project design at considerably reduced levels of subsurface uncertainty leading to improved engineering business outcomes. The industry is encouraged to promptly incorporate the screening philosophy into feasibility and planning activities and into design codes for geotechnical design and construction.