m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 568499244 to Meliciani Radicchia 2016a) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Original document == | == Original document == | ||
| + | <pdf>Media:Meliciani_Radicchia_2016a_9350_18458.pdf</pdf> | ||
The different versions of the original document can be found in: | The different versions of the original document can be found in: | ||
* [https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/18458/1/18458.pdf https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/18458/1/18458.pdf] | * [https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/18458/1/18458.pdf https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/18458/1/18458.pdf] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:14, 14 October 2020
Abstract
This paper investigates the role of skill heterogeneity in affecting differences in occupational mismatch across fields of study. By relying on measures of overeducation and overskill collected in the 2014 ISFOL survey, we test to which extent the two phenomena differ across fields of study and the role played by merit and non-cognitive skills. We find that having an excellent graduate curriculum significantly decreases over-education and over-skill, while non-cognitive skills do not matter.
Document type: Book
Original document
The different versions of the original document can be found in:Back to Top
Document information
Published on 01/01/2016
Volume 2016, 2016
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?