m (Cinmemj moved page Draft Samper 643600983 to Torres-Sanchez et al 2015a) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The microscopic stress field provides a unique connection between atomistic simulations and mechanics at the nanoscale. However, its definition remains ambiguous. Rather than a mere theoretical preoccupation, we show that this fact acutely manifests itself in local stress calculations of defective graphene, lipid bilayers, and fibrous proteins. We find that popular definitions of the microscopic stress violate the continuum statements of mechanical equilibrium, and we propose an unambiguous and physically sound definition. | The microscopic stress field provides a unique connection between atomistic simulations and mechanics at the nanoscale. However, its definition remains ambiguous. Rather than a mere theoretical preoccupation, we show that this fact acutely manifests itself in local stress calculations of defective graphene, lipid bilayers, and fibrous proteins. We find that popular definitions of the microscopic stress violate the continuum statements of mechanical equilibrium, and we propose an unambiguous and physically sound definition. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Full Document== | ||
+ | |||
+ | <pdf>Media:Torres-Sanchez_et_al_2015a_4009_2015-PRL-TVA-blanc.pdf</pdf> |
The microscopic stress field provides a unique connection between atomistic simulations and mechanics at the nanoscale. However, its definition remains ambiguous. Rather than a mere theoretical preoccupation, we show that this fact acutely manifests itself in local stress calculations of defective graphene, lipid bilayers, and fibrous proteins. We find that popular definitions of the microscopic stress violate the continuum statements of mechanical equilibrium, and we propose an unambiguous and physically sound definition.
Published on 01/01/2015
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.258102
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?