m (JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 797717925 to Wei et al 2024a) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This paper deals with anisotropic ductile damage and fracture behavior under low positive stress triaxialities. Novel tension–shear biaxial low–cycle experiments with different numbers of loading cycles (up to twenty) have been performed using a cruciform biaxially loaded specimen. During the experiment, a tensile preload is first imposed on the horizontal axis until it reaches 3kN; then, it is kept constant while different shear cyclic loading sequences are superimposed on the vertical axis until failure. All cyclic loadings are driven to a large strain range to investigate ductile damage, and the same amplitude is maintained for each repeated reverse loading cycle within a single loading pattern. In addition, numerical simulations are performed with an anisotropic stress-state-dependent plastic-damage continuum model, also considering the Bauschinger effect. The experimental and numerical analysis of the evolution of the first principal total strain and damage strains highlights the influence of the cyclic loading history on the material behavior. Moreover, fracture surfaces are examined by scanning electron microscopy to analyze the different mechanical performances at the micro-level | This paper deals with anisotropic ductile damage and fracture behavior under low positive stress triaxialities. Novel tension–shear biaxial low–cycle experiments with different numbers of loading cycles (up to twenty) have been performed using a cruciform biaxially loaded specimen. During the experiment, a tensile preload is first imposed on the horizontal axis until it reaches 3kN; then, it is kept constant while different shear cyclic loading sequences are superimposed on the vertical axis until failure. All cyclic loadings are driven to a large strain range to investigate ductile damage, and the same amplitude is maintained for each repeated reverse loading cycle within a single loading pattern. In addition, numerical simulations are performed with an anisotropic stress-state-dependent plastic-damage continuum model, also considering the Bauschinger effect. The experimental and numerical analysis of the evolution of the first principal total strain and damage strains highlights the influence of the cyclic loading history on the material behavior. Moreover, fracture surfaces are examined by scanning electron microscopy to analyze the different mechanical performances at the micro-level | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Full Paper == | ||
+ | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_797717925pap_43.pdf</pdf> |
This paper deals with anisotropic ductile damage and fracture behavior under low positive stress triaxialities. Novel tension–shear biaxial low–cycle experiments with different numbers of loading cycles (up to twenty) have been performed using a cruciform biaxially loaded specimen. During the experiment, a tensile preload is first imposed on the horizontal axis until it reaches 3kN; then, it is kept constant while different shear cyclic loading sequences are superimposed on the vertical axis until failure. All cyclic loadings are driven to a large strain range to investigate ductile damage, and the same amplitude is maintained for each repeated reverse loading cycle within a single loading pattern. In addition, numerical simulations are performed with an anisotropic stress-state-dependent plastic-damage continuum model, also considering the Bauschinger effect. The experimental and numerical analysis of the evolution of the first principal total strain and damage strains highlights the influence of the cyclic loading history on the material behavior. Moreover, fracture surfaces are examined by scanning electron microscopy to analyze the different mechanical performances at the micro-level
Published on 23/10/24
Submitted on 23/10/24
Volume Advanced Materials: Computational Analysis of Properties and Performance, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/eccomas.2024.009
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?