(Created blank page)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
                               
 +
==Abstract==
  
 +
Dry stacking of filtered tailings has become feasible due to the development of novel dewatering technologies. It offers an alternative to address the safety-related issues associated with conventional slurry disposal in reservoirs confined by upstream heightened dams. The operation and maintenance of such structures are challenging because of the high degree of uncertainty inherent in this material due to its spatial variability in state and gradation. It is also susceptible to liquefaction when saturated and in a loose state. In contrast, the filtered tailings can be compacted and piled up to hundreds of meters to meet prescribed design requirements. Eventually, a cementing agent can be incorporated into the tailings before compaction to enhance the general engineering properties. Nevertheless, few dry-stack facilities operate; none use cement as a stabilising agent. Accordingly, this paper assesses the mechanical response of artificially cemented iron ore tailings compacted in the field to form an experimental pile. Plate load tests and cone penetration tests were used. The experimental pile was divided into four sections, each compacted with different combinations of roller passes (4 or 6 passes) with and without vibration frequency. The results showed that the compacted material was practically insensitive to variations in compaction parameters, as evidenced by similar results in the tested sections' stress-strain responses and cone tip strength values. This study also highlights the effectiveness of field testing in investigating the response of stacking plants and the importance of using a small amount of cement to achieve adequate mechanical performance.
 +
 +
== Full Paper ==
 +
<pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_95937259934.pdf</pdf>

Latest revision as of 12:51, 7 June 2024

Abstract

Dry stacking of filtered tailings has become feasible due to the development of novel dewatering technologies. It offers an alternative to address the safety-related issues associated with conventional slurry disposal in reservoirs confined by upstream heightened dams. The operation and maintenance of such structures are challenging because of the high degree of uncertainty inherent in this material due to its spatial variability in state and gradation. It is also susceptible to liquefaction when saturated and in a loose state. In contrast, the filtered tailings can be compacted and piled up to hundreds of meters to meet prescribed design requirements. Eventually, a cementing agent can be incorporated into the tailings before compaction to enhance the general engineering properties. Nevertheless, few dry-stack facilities operate; none use cement as a stabilising agent. Accordingly, this paper assesses the mechanical response of artificially cemented iron ore tailings compacted in the field to form an experimental pile. Plate load tests and cone penetration tests were used. The experimental pile was divided into four sections, each compacted with different combinations of roller passes (4 or 6 passes) with and without vibration frequency. The results showed that the compacted material was practically insensitive to variations in compaction parameters, as evidenced by similar results in the tested sections' stress-strain responses and cone tip strength values. This study also highlights the effectiveness of field testing in investigating the response of stacking plants and the importance of using a small amount of cement to achieve adequate mechanical performance.

Full Paper

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 07/06/24
Submitted on 07/06/24

Volume Geotechnical characterization of mine tailings, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.034
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?