(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
In 2022, a new set of probabilistic shear wave velocity (𝑉𝑆) based liquefaction triggering curves was developed for  gravelly soil by Rollins et al., using a dataset of 96 liquefaction and 78 no liquefaction case histories from 17 earthquakes in seven countries. Although these curves provide liquefaction assessment based on direct field performance, they suffer from the fact that there are relatively few case histories for high 𝐶𝑆𝑅 and high 𝑉𝑆 values to define the shape of the upper branch of the triggering curves. Thus, we made shear wave velocity measurements at three sites in Valdez, Alaska where liquefaction did not occur in the Mw  9.2 1964 Great Alaska earthquake. The Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) technique was used to develop several median Vs profiles at each site that account for uncertainty in the experimental dispersion data and inversion parameterizations. 𝑉𝑆-based liquefaction evaluations were then made at each site, using the 𝑉𝑆 profiles derived from each solution. Results from previous Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DPT) tests were then used in selecting the most reasonable velocity interpretation. Based on this VS profile, the layer most likely to liquefy was selected and used to define 𝑉𝑆1 and 𝐶𝑆𝑅7.5 at the middle of this critical layer, obtaining three points of no liquefaction, that could change the shape of the upper branch of the existing VS-based liquefaction triggering curves. These preliminary results suggest that it might be necessary to shift the triggering curves to the left or steepen their slope to provide better agreement with observed performance.
 
In 2022, a new set of probabilistic shear wave velocity (𝑉𝑆) based liquefaction triggering curves was developed for  gravelly soil by Rollins et al., using a dataset of 96 liquefaction and 78 no liquefaction case histories from 17 earthquakes in seven countries. Although these curves provide liquefaction assessment based on direct field performance, they suffer from the fact that there are relatively few case histories for high 𝐶𝑆𝑅 and high 𝑉𝑆 values to define the shape of the upper branch of the triggering curves. Thus, we made shear wave velocity measurements at three sites in Valdez, Alaska where liquefaction did not occur in the Mw  9.2 1964 Great Alaska earthquake. The Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) technique was used to develop several median Vs profiles at each site that account for uncertainty in the experimental dispersion data and inversion parameterizations. 𝑉𝑆-based liquefaction evaluations were then made at each site, using the 𝑉𝑆 profiles derived from each solution. Results from previous Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DPT) tests were then used in selecting the most reasonable velocity interpretation. Based on this VS profile, the layer most likely to liquefy was selected and used to define 𝑉𝑆1 and 𝐶𝑆𝑅7.5 at the middle of this critical layer, obtaining three points of no liquefaction, that could change the shape of the upper branch of the existing VS-based liquefaction triggering curves. These preliminary results suggest that it might be necessary to shift the triggering curves to the left or steepen their slope to provide better agreement with observed performance.
 +
 +
== Full Paper ==
 +
<pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_634512610159.pdf</pdf>

Latest revision as of 12:27, 7 June 2024

Abstract

In 2022, a new set of probabilistic shear wave velocity (𝑉𝑆) based liquefaction triggering curves was developed for gravelly soil by Rollins et al., using a dataset of 96 liquefaction and 78 no liquefaction case histories from 17 earthquakes in seven countries. Although these curves provide liquefaction assessment based on direct field performance, they suffer from the fact that there are relatively few case histories for high 𝐶𝑆𝑅 and high 𝑉𝑆 values to define the shape of the upper branch of the triggering curves. Thus, we made shear wave velocity measurements at three sites in Valdez, Alaska where liquefaction did not occur in the Mw 9.2 1964 Great Alaska earthquake. The Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) technique was used to develop several median Vs profiles at each site that account for uncertainty in the experimental dispersion data and inversion parameterizations. 𝑉𝑆-based liquefaction evaluations were then made at each site, using the 𝑉𝑆 profiles derived from each solution. Results from previous Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DPT) tests were then used in selecting the most reasonable velocity interpretation. Based on this VS profile, the layer most likely to liquefy was selected and used to define 𝑉𝑆1 and 𝐶𝑆𝑅7.5 at the middle of this critical layer, obtaining three points of no liquefaction, that could change the shape of the upper branch of the existing VS-based liquefaction triggering curves. These preliminary results suggest that it might be necessary to shift the triggering curves to the left or steepen their slope to provide better agreement with observed performance.

Full Paper

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 07/06/24
Submitted on 07/06/24

Volume From measurement to reliable in situ geotechnical site characterization – statistical data processing, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.159
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?