Latest revision as of 10:35, 7 June 2024

Abstract

The Dynamic Penetration Test (DPT) is widely applied for soil field characterization. The technique is usually appreciated as a simple and cost-effective means of determine soil resistance which can be obtained either from Newtonian or from wave equation methods. While wave equation analysis has demonstrated numerous advantages in recent decades, its adoption is constrained by the need for specific instrumentation and more complex analysis. Consequently, the simpler Newtonian analysis, and particularly the Dutch Formula specified by ISO 22476-2, remains the more commonly used approach for routine geotechnical applications. To ensure its accuracy comparing to wave equation-based methods, a field campaigns were conducted on experimental sites with various soil types. The campaigns included Cone Penetration Test (CPT), which is used as a reference tool in this study, and instrumented DPTs allowing easy application of wave equation methods. Results revealed that Dutch Formula resistance values were comparable to both CPT results and those derived from wave equation methods in most cases. In addition, DF variation formula applying energy measurement seemed to underestimate cone resistance in all case examined. The study highlights the importance of applying good practice rules to enhance DPT results

Full Paper