(Created blank page) |
m (JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 172982642 to Long* et al 2024a) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Abstract== | ||
+ | This paper reviews the use of piezocone (CPTU) testing to characterise and identify peats and organic soils. Examples of data for peat sites from several countries are given, including some experience of the use of T-bar and piezoball penetrometers in peat. These “full flow” devices show smoother resistance profiles than the equivalent from the CPTU and are perhaps representative of the peat mass with a reduced fibre effect. In CPTU tests, organic soils and peat are often characterised by low corrected cone resistance (qt) and high friction ratio (Rf). CPTU penetration in peat is often drained with data showing low pore water pressure coefficient (Bq) values. Rf broadly decreases with increasing degree of decomposition of the peat. However care needs to be taken in using Rf values in peat given the characteristically very low sleeve friction values (fs) encountered. It would seem that it is not always easy to distinguish between peat and underlying soft soils using CPTU alone. There may be some promise in inclusion of CPTU “add on” sensors particularly a seismic element to yield shear wave velocity (Vs). However there is some uncertainty in measuring Vs in peat both offshore and onshore so care is needed in this regard. Recently developed Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) charts from the Netherlands have also been trialled on several sites. This new formulation shows promise and warrants further study | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Full Paper == | ||
+ | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_172982642182.pdf</pdf> |
This paper reviews the use of piezocone (CPTU) testing to characterise and identify peats and organic soils. Examples of data for peat sites from several countries are given, including some experience of the use of T-bar and piezoball penetrometers in peat. These “full flow” devices show smoother resistance profiles than the equivalent from the CPTU and are perhaps representative of the peat mass with a reduced fibre effect. In CPTU tests, organic soils and peat are often characterised by low corrected cone resistance (qt) and high friction ratio (Rf). CPTU penetration in peat is often drained with data showing low pore water pressure coefficient (Bq) values. Rf broadly decreases with increasing degree of decomposition of the peat. However care needs to be taken in using Rf values in peat given the characteristically very low sleeve friction values (fs) encountered. It would seem that it is not always easy to distinguish between peat and underlying soft soils using CPTU alone. There may be some promise in inclusion of CPTU “add on” sensors particularly a seismic element to yield shear wave velocity (Vs). However there is some uncertainty in measuring Vs in peat both offshore and onshore so care is needed in this regard. Recently developed Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) charts from the Netherlands have also been trialled on several sites. This new formulation shows promise and warrants further study
Published on 06/06/24
Submitted on 06/06/24
Volume Characterization of non-textbook materials, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.182
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?