Latest revision as of 14:23, 6 June 2024

Abstract

Research has already demonstrated advantages in performing piezoball tests when compared to piezocone in estimating the soil undrained shear strength (Su) along the stratigraphy and remolded strength (Sur) through cyclic tests, showing a shorter range of strength correction factors (N) and lower dependence on the soil stiffness index (Ir). Another possible application is estimating the remolded shear strength directly from penetration (qin) and extraction (qext) measurements without requiring cyclic tests. This research performed piezocone, vane, and piezoball tests (standard and cyclic) in a soft soil deposit in southern Brazil. Additionally, undisturbed samples were collected for characterization. The in situ investigation resulted in cone and ball factors in accordance with the international practice recommendation, resulting in similar profiles of undrained strength Su which increases with depth from 3 to 14 kPa and constant values of remolded undrained strength Sur. Regarding estimating the Sur through direct measurements of penetration and extraction of the piezoball, it was necessary to carefully evaluate the time laps between probe insertion and extraction to avoid overestimating the remolded strength.

Full Paper