m (JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 137912187 to Vrielink* et al 2024a) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The demand for thermal site characterization has risen noticeably in the past decade, particularly for design of geothermal energy solutions and for design of in-ground power cable networks. The results of thermal characterization of a site are typically incorporated in a ground model based on environmental, geological, geophysical and geotechnical geodata. This paper compares in-situ test methods for thermal site characterization of soil. The comparison considers method applicability, deployment method, maximum test depth, test duration and uncertainty of results. A distinction is made between three categories of in-situ tests: (1) in-situ tests using active heat generation, (2) in-situ tests using passive heat generation and (3) in-situ tests with no specific thermal data acquisition | The demand for thermal site characterization has risen noticeably in the past decade, particularly for design of geothermal energy solutions and for design of in-ground power cable networks. The results of thermal characterization of a site are typically incorporated in a ground model based on environmental, geological, geophysical and geotechnical geodata. This paper compares in-situ test methods for thermal site characterization of soil. The comparison considers method applicability, deployment method, maximum test depth, test duration and uncertainty of results. A distinction is made between three categories of in-situ tests: (1) in-situ tests using active heat generation, (2) in-situ tests using passive heat generation and (3) in-situ tests with no specific thermal data acquisition | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Full Paper == | ||
| + | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_13791218713.pdf</pdf> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:06, 6 June 2024
Abstract
The demand for thermal site characterization has risen noticeably in the past decade, particularly for design of geothermal energy solutions and for design of in-ground power cable networks. The results of thermal characterization of a site are typically incorporated in a ground model based on environmental, geological, geophysical and geotechnical geodata. This paper compares in-situ test methods for thermal site characterization of soil. The comparison considers method applicability, deployment method, maximum test depth, test duration and uncertainty of results. A distinction is made between three categories of in-situ tests: (1) in-situ tests using active heat generation, (2) in-situ tests using passive heat generation and (3) in-situ tests with no specific thermal data acquisition
Full Paper
Document information
Published on 06/06/24
Submitted on 06/06/24
Volume Characterization for thermo-hydraulic problems, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.013
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?