Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
This paper discusses two ratios involving penetration resistance and shear-wave velocity (VS) that have been proposed for quantifying the influence of microstructure in aged and cemented soils for liquefaction assessment. The first ratio is the small-strain shear modulus (Gmax) divided by the cone penetration test tip resistance (qc). Because Gmax/qc is dimensionless, it can be expressed as a ratio of measured VS divided by a function of qc with velocity units. The second ratio is the measured VS divided by an estimated VS from penetration resistance-VS relationships for relatively young sand deposits (MEVR). The advantages and limitations of both ratios are discussed. The influence of various fines content (𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹) corrections on 𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆, penetration resistance-𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆 relationships, and a relationship between MEVR and the liquefaction cyclic resistance ratio correction factor for microstructure (𝐾𝐾𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷) is evaluated using two published datasets. The results show the 𝐹 𝐹𝐹𝐹 correction to 𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆 is minimal in the range for which the correction was derived. The 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹 corrections to qc and standard penetration test blow count are significant for silty soils, having a net effect of lowering the penetration resistance-𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆 relationships and increasing the slope of the 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑉𝑉𝑀𝑀-𝐾𝐾𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 predictive relationship
 
This paper discusses two ratios involving penetration resistance and shear-wave velocity (VS) that have been proposed for quantifying the influence of microstructure in aged and cemented soils for liquefaction assessment. The first ratio is the small-strain shear modulus (Gmax) divided by the cone penetration test tip resistance (qc). Because Gmax/qc is dimensionless, it can be expressed as a ratio of measured VS divided by a function of qc with velocity units. The second ratio is the measured VS divided by an estimated VS from penetration resistance-VS relationships for relatively young sand deposits (MEVR). The advantages and limitations of both ratios are discussed. The influence of various fines content (𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹) corrections on 𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆, penetration resistance-𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆 relationships, and a relationship between MEVR and the liquefaction cyclic resistance ratio correction factor for microstructure (𝐾𝐾𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷) is evaluated using two published datasets. The results show the 𝐹 𝐹𝐹𝐹 correction to 𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆 is minimal in the range for which the correction was derived. The 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹 corrections to qc and standard penetration test blow count are significant for silty soils, having a net effect of lowering the penetration resistance-𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆 relationships and increasing the slope of the 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑉𝑉𝑀𝑀-𝐾𝐾𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 predictive relationship
 +
 +
== Full Paper ==
 +
<pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_192462982156.pdf</pdf>

Revision as of 14:53, 6 June 2024

Abstract

This paper discusses two ratios involving penetration resistance and shear-wave velocity (VS) that have been proposed for quantifying the influence of microstructure in aged and cemented soils for liquefaction assessment. The first ratio is the small-strain shear modulus (Gmax) divided by the cone penetration test tip resistance (qc). Because Gmax/qc is dimensionless, it can be expressed as a ratio of measured VS divided by a function of qc with velocity units. The second ratio is the measured VS divided by an estimated VS from penetration resistance-VS relationships for relatively young sand deposits (MEVR). The advantages and limitations of both ratios are discussed. The influence of various fines content (𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹) corrections on 𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆, penetration resistance-𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆 relationships, and a relationship between MEVR and the liquefaction cyclic resistance ratio correction factor for microstructure (𝐾𝐾𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷) is evaluated using two published datasets. The results show the 𝐹 𝐹𝐹𝐹 correction to 𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆 is minimal in the range for which the correction was derived. The 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹 corrections to qc and standard penetration test blow count are significant for silty soils, having a net effect of lowering the penetration resistance-𝑉𝑉𝑆𝑆 relationships and increasing the slope of the 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑉𝑉𝑀𝑀-𝐾𝐾𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 predictive relationship

Full Paper

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 06/06/24
Submitted on 06/06/24

Volume Advances in geotechnical site characterization, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.156
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?