(Created blank page) |
m (JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 190862026 to Janeras* et al 2024a) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Abstract== | ||
+ | The Montserrat Massif (Catalonia, NE of Spain) is a natural and cultural heritage where rockfall risk arises. Therefore, a risk mitigation plan is underway, including rockfall monitoring at different scales using different techniques. Particularly, the rock block A3-6, menacing the rack railway leading to the monastery, has been monitored since 2010 by extensometers that show the cyclic movement due to the annual thermal cycle, which is mainly recoverable, but small residual plastic derivations have been detected in a varying amount, along years. At the end of 2021, stabilization work has been carried out. The block has been monitored with passive seismic techniques before, during, and after these works in order to detect signs or evidence of evolving stability similar to previous experiences in the Alps. Two main results have been found. On the one hand, a slight difference in the recorded ambient noise between the potentially unstable block and the rear massif was detected, for both the H/V spectral ratio and the polar spectrogram. A characteristic resonance frequency of the block is observed around 20 Hz in the direction of the toppling instability mechanism. On the other hand, during the drilling works of the anchor bolts, it was possible to clearly detect when the drilling hammer crossed the rear joint of the block. This allows confirming the assumed geometry of the block and the required anchor length, as well as a qualitative assessment of the persistence of the joint and its mechanical contact. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Full Paper == | ||
+ | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_19086202617.pdf</pdf> |
The Montserrat Massif (Catalonia, NE of Spain) is a natural and cultural heritage where rockfall risk arises. Therefore, a risk mitigation plan is underway, including rockfall monitoring at different scales using different techniques. Particularly, the rock block A3-6, menacing the rack railway leading to the monastery, has been monitored since 2010 by extensometers that show the cyclic movement due to the annual thermal cycle, which is mainly recoverable, but small residual plastic derivations have been detected in a varying amount, along years. At the end of 2021, stabilization work has been carried out. The block has been monitored with passive seismic techniques before, during, and after these works in order to detect signs or evidence of evolving stability similar to previous experiences in the Alps. Two main results have been found. On the one hand, a slight difference in the recorded ambient noise between the potentially unstable block and the rear massif was detected, for both the H/V spectral ratio and the polar spectrogram. A characteristic resonance frequency of the block is observed around 20 Hz in the direction of the toppling instability mechanism. On the other hand, during the drilling works of the anchor bolts, it was possible to clearly detect when the drilling hammer crossed the rear joint of the block. This allows confirming the assumed geometry of the block and the required anchor length, as well as a qualitative assessment of the persistence of the joint and its mechanical contact.
Published on 06/06/24
Submitted on 06/06/24
Volume Advances in geophysical ground characterization, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.017
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?