(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
A recent series of CPTU soundings in sensitive clay at the Louiseville Quebec test site has been published, allowing for the application of two closed-form analytical solutions based on: (1) effective stress limit plasticity and (2) hybrid cavity expansion-critical state methods. These are used for geoparameter interpretations including: effective stress friction angle, undrained shear strength, yield stress ratio, undrained rigidity index, and the coefficient of consolidation. Profiles of these soil parameters are compared with the benchmark values obtained from available series of previous and present laboratory testing programs at this site, including index testing, triaxial compression, and one-dimensional consolidation. Piezocone dissipation tests are used to assess the coefficient of consolidation which are validated by pressuremeter holding tests and lab oedometer tests. An empirical CPTU screening method identifies the Louiseville site as underlain by sensitive clay, versus a regular insensitive clay deposit, whereas soil behavior type charts using Q-F-Bq indicate the soils are either silt (zone 4) or regular clay (zone 3). The alternate screening method is verified by field vane and laboratory fall cone that show the clay is in fact sensitive (average St  ≈ 22).
 
A recent series of CPTU soundings in sensitive clay at the Louiseville Quebec test site has been published, allowing for the application of two closed-form analytical solutions based on: (1) effective stress limit plasticity and (2) hybrid cavity expansion-critical state methods. These are used for geoparameter interpretations including: effective stress friction angle, undrained shear strength, yield stress ratio, undrained rigidity index, and the coefficient of consolidation. Profiles of these soil parameters are compared with the benchmark values obtained from available series of previous and present laboratory testing programs at this site, including index testing, triaxial compression, and one-dimensional consolidation. Piezocone dissipation tests are used to assess the coefficient of consolidation which are validated by pressuremeter holding tests and lab oedometer tests. An empirical CPTU screening method identifies the Louiseville site as underlain by sensitive clay, versus a regular insensitive clay deposit, whereas soil behavior type charts using Q-F-Bq indicate the soils are either silt (zone 4) or regular clay (zone 3). The alternate screening method is verified by field vane and laboratory fall cone that show the clay is in fact sensitive (average St  ≈ 22).
 +
 +
== Full Paper ==
 +
<pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_789677699110.pdf</pdf>

Latest revision as of 11:58, 6 June 2024

Abstract

A recent series of CPTU soundings in sensitive clay at the Louiseville Quebec test site has been published, allowing for the application of two closed-form analytical solutions based on: (1) effective stress limit plasticity and (2) hybrid cavity expansion-critical state methods. These are used for geoparameter interpretations including: effective stress friction angle, undrained shear strength, yield stress ratio, undrained rigidity index, and the coefficient of consolidation. Profiles of these soil parameters are compared with the benchmark values obtained from available series of previous and present laboratory testing programs at this site, including index testing, triaxial compression, and one-dimensional consolidation. Piezocone dissipation tests are used to assess the coefficient of consolidation which are validated by pressuremeter holding tests and lab oedometer tests. An empirical CPTU screening method identifies the Louiseville site as underlain by sensitive clay, versus a regular insensitive clay deposit, whereas soil behavior type charts using Q-F-Bq indicate the soils are either silt (zone 4) or regular clay (zone 3). The alternate screening method is verified by field vane and laboratory fall cone that show the clay is in fact sensitive (average St ≈ 22).

Full Paper

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 06/06/24
Submitted on 06/06/24

Volume Advances in CPTu testing and interpretation, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.110
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?