(Created blank page) |
m (JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 659345849 to Liu et al 2023d) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Abstract== | ||
+ | The study aims at investigating the feasibility of using recycled aggregate (RA) and recovered fibres (RF) obtained from recycling of polypropylene fibre reinforced concrete (PPFRC) in new concrete production. The mechanical properties were compared between a parent concrete, polypropylene fibre reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (PPRAC), and recovered polypropylene fibre concrete (Re-PPRFC). All concretes were designed to have the same compressive strength and slump. The parent concrete was produced with 9 kg/m3 of polypropylene fibre. After recycling, the RA and RF were collected and new concretes with RA and RF, PPRAC and PPRFC, respectively, were produced with the same fibre content as the parent concretes. The strain-stress relationship in compression and residual tensile strength were tested. The results obtained for PPFRC, PPRAC and rePPRFC were compared. The results show that the RA and RF obtained by PPFRC recycling can benefit new concrete production. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Full Paper == | ||
+ | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_659345849133.pdf</pdf> |
The study aims at investigating the feasibility of using recycled aggregate (RA) and recovered fibres (RF) obtained from recycling of polypropylene fibre reinforced concrete (PPFRC) in new concrete production. The mechanical properties were compared between a parent concrete, polypropylene fibre reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (PPRAC), and recovered polypropylene fibre concrete (Re-PPRFC). All concretes were designed to have the same compressive strength and slump. The parent concrete was produced with 9 kg/m3 of polypropylene fibre. After recycling, the RA and RF were collected and new concretes with RA and RF, PPRAC and PPRFC, respectively, were produced with the same fibre content as the parent concretes. The strain-stress relationship in compression and residual tensile strength were tested. The results obtained for PPFRC, PPRAC and rePPRFC were compared. The results show that the RA and RF obtained by PPFRC recycling can benefit new concrete production.
Published on 03/10/23
Submitted on 03/10/23
DOI: 10.23967/c.dbmc.2023.133
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?