| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In this paper a multi-stage numerical analysis is presented with the aim to investigate effects of forming on the high-cycle fatigue performance of a deep-drawn aluminum sheet structure for use in a floating photovoltaic system. Forming simulations of a subsection of the full geometry are performed in a realistic two-step drawing-springback cycle. A simplified global analysis of service load response is performed to obtain displacements at the submodel boundary, that are used to generate boundary conditions for a local service load analysis. The local analysis is then performed on three different models of the subsection: (I) excluding forming effects, (II) including effects of thinning, and (III) including effects of thinning and residual stresses. The critical location with respect to the fatigue limit criterion in the Ottosen-Stenström-Ristinmaa high-cycle fatigue model was identified for case (I), and this location was used to compare the different models to assess effects of forming on high-cycle fatigue performance. Furthermore, the dynamic friction coefficient , and the isotropickinematic mixing coefficient were varied in order to investigate their respective effects. | In this paper a multi-stage numerical analysis is presented with the aim to investigate effects of forming on the high-cycle fatigue performance of a deep-drawn aluminum sheet structure for use in a floating photovoltaic system. Forming simulations of a subsection of the full geometry are performed in a realistic two-step drawing-springback cycle. A simplified global analysis of service load response is performed to obtain displacements at the submodel boundary, that are used to generate boundary conditions for a local service load analysis. The local analysis is then performed on three different models of the subsection: (I) excluding forming effects, (II) including effects of thinning, and (III) including effects of thinning and residual stresses. The critical location with respect to the fatigue limit criterion in the Ottosen-Stenström-Ristinmaa high-cycle fatigue model was identified for case (I), and this location was used to compare the different models to assess effects of forming on high-cycle fatigue performance. Furthermore, the dynamic friction coefficient , and the isotropickinematic mixing coefficient were varied in order to investigate their respective effects. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Abstract == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pdf>Media:Tveit_et_al_2022a_3519_ECCOMAS 2022_Tveit et al._Abstract.pdf</pdf> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Full Paper == | ||
| + | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_6235095871170_paper.pdf</pdf> | ||
Latest revision as of 09:12, 7 December 2022
Summary
In this paper a multi-stage numerical analysis is presented with the aim to investigate effects of forming on the high-cycle fatigue performance of a deep-drawn aluminum sheet structure for use in a floating photovoltaic system. Forming simulations of a subsection of the full geometry are performed in a realistic two-step drawing-springback cycle. A simplified global analysis of service load response is performed to obtain displacements at the submodel boundary, that are used to generate boundary conditions for a local service load analysis. The local analysis is then performed on three different models of the subsection: (I) excluding forming effects, (II) including effects of thinning, and (III) including effects of thinning and residual stresses. The critical location with respect to the fatigue limit criterion in the Ottosen-Stenström-Ristinmaa high-cycle fatigue model was identified for case (I), and this location was used to compare the different models to assess effects of forming on high-cycle fatigue performance. Furthermore, the dynamic friction coefficient , and the isotropickinematic mixing coefficient were varied in order to investigate their respective effects.
Abstract
Full Paper
Document information
Published on 24/11/22
Accepted on 24/11/22
Submitted on 24/11/22
Volume Computational Solid Mechanics, 2022
DOI: 10.23967/eccomas.2022.127
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?