m (Move page script moved page Menez et al 1970a to Menez et al 2022a) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The aim of this work is to model compressible flows involving shock waves past a solid obstacle using a non-conformal mesh. An Immersed Boundary Method (IBM) with feedback forcing and a volume penalization method are considered and compared. Both methods are validated on various test-cases. Accuracy and computational cost are discussed. | The aim of this work is to model compressible flows involving shock waves past a solid obstacle using a non-conformal mesh. An Immersed Boundary Method (IBM) with feedback forcing and a volume penalization method are considered and compared. Both methods are validated on various test-cases. Accuracy and computational cost are discussed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Abstract == | ||
| + | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_862797243334_abstract.pdf</pdf> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Full Paper == | ||
| + | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_862797243334_paper.pdf</pdf> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:06, 25 November 2022
Summary
The aim of this work is to model compressible flows involving shock waves past a solid obstacle using a non-conformal mesh. An Immersed Boundary Method (IBM) with feedback forcing and a volume penalization method are considered and compared. Both methods are validated on various test-cases. Accuracy and computational cost are discussed.
Abstract
Full Paper
Back to Top
GET PDF
Document information
Published on 24/11/22
Accepted on 24/11/22
Submitted on 24/11/22
Volume Science Computing, 2022
DOI: 10.23967/eccomas.2022.002
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?