Line 89: Line 89:
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image13.png|486px]] </div>
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image13.png|486px]] </div>
  
Figure 6. Non destructive test. Example of Porosity.
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 +
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 6.''' Non destructive test. Example of Porosity.</span></div>
  
 
The sensor used to monitor infusion and curing processes is based on Electrical Time Domain Reflectometry (E-TDR) [2].
 
The sensor used to monitor infusion and curing processes is based on Electrical Time Domain Reflectometry (E-TDR) [2].
Line 96: Line 97:
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image14-c.png|600px]] </div>
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image14-c.png|600px]] </div>
  
Figure 7. Schematic Illustration of E-TDR Technology.
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 +
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 7.''' Schematic Illustration of E-TDR Technology.</span></div>
  
 
==3 Materials and Technology==
 
==3 Materials and Technology==
Line 109: Line 111:
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image15.png|360px]] </div>
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image15.png|360px]] </div>
  
Figure 8. MTorres Dry Fiber Placement machine (DFP).
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 +
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 8.''' MTorres Dry Fiber Placement machine (DFP).</span></div>
  
 
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image16-c.png|300px]] </div>
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image16-c.png|300px]] </div>
  
Figure 9. Uniaxial material.
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 +
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 9.''' Uniaxial material.</span></div>
  
 
:* Automated Dry Material Placement (ADMP):
 
:* Automated Dry Material Placement (ADMP):
Line 123: Line 127:
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image17.png|366px]] </div>
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image17.png|366px]] </div>
  
Figure 10. Danobat  Automated Dry Material Placement machine (ADMP).
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 +
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 10.''' Danobat  Automated Dry Material Placement machine (ADMP).</span></div>
  
 
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image18.png|294px]] </div>
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image18.png|294px]] </div>
  
Figure 11. Multiaxial material.
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 +
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 11.''' Multiaxial material.</span></div>
  
 
The resin that will be used in the infusion and curing processes is a thermoset liquid epoxy resin.
 
The resin that will be used in the infusion and curing processes is a thermoset liquid epoxy resin.
Line 155: Line 161:
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image19.png|600px]] </div>
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image19.png|600px]] </div>
  
Figure 12. Demonstrator 2.
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 +
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 12.''' Demonstrator 2.</span></div>
  
 
The demo part proposed is based on double curvature in order to identify potential lay-up defects as excessively wide gaps, overlaps, fuzz balls, twisted yarns, or other defects.
 
The demo part proposed is based on double curvature in order to identify potential lay-up defects as excessively wide gaps, overlaps, fuzz balls, twisted yarns, or other defects.
Line 168: Line 175:
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image20.png|600px]] </div>
 
  [[Image:Rodriguez_et_al_2018b-image20.png|600px]] </div>
  
Figure 13. Demonstrator 3.
+
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 +
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 13.''' Demonstrator 3.</span></div>
  
 
The integration of the stringers in the demo part is necessary in order to test a real case of a stiffened panel for the infusion process.
 
The integration of the stringers in the demo part is necessary in order to test a real case of a stiffened panel for the infusion process.

Latest revision as of 17:48, 13 October 2022

1 Introduction

ZAero Project is framed within the program of aid to research and innovation of the European Union H2020 [() ].

The consortium consists of the following partners: PROFACTOR, DASSAULT SYSTÈMES SE, MTORRES sistemas industriales, DANOBAT, IK4-IDEKO, AIRBUS DEFENSE&SPACE GmbH and FIDAMC.

The aim of ZAero “Zero defect manufacturing of composite parts in the aerospace industry” project is the development of inline quality control methods for carbon fibre parts production (CFRP) to achieve:

  • Inline quality controled by:
  • Increased productivity flexibility.
  • Higher production rated by 15%.
  • Avoiding productivity losses due to in-situ manual inspection work.
  • Reduction of manual in-situ inspection processes during lay-up, after infusion and curing and end-of-line rework in order to reduce production cost by 15-20%.
  • Earlier re-work processes, inline monitoring and process control to reduce waste and scrap by 50%.

2 ZAero control system

The ZAero system provides an inline and automatic system to detect defects during the manufacturing through sensors. The objective of the control system with sensors is to reach TRL 6-7 during the manufacturing trials at FIDAMC.

The control is performed during the manufacturing process of a stiffened surface panel:

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image5.png
Figure 1. Process Flow Chart.

The ZAero control system acts on 2 steps of the manufacturing processes: Lay-up and infusion-curing.

  • In the case of lay-up every layer is automatically inspected inline by ZAero sensors.
Rodriguez et al 2018b-image6.png
Figure 2. Current working method (orange) and ZAero method (blue).

The inline inspection that will perform the control system is shown in the Figure 3.

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image7.png Figure 3. Steps in System control process

Operators will inspect and act only when the error is detected by sensors. Several defects can be detected as angle deviation; late add, early cut and early add, late cut; missing tow; splices; gaps and overlaps; twist-DFP; fuzzball; defects in z-direction.

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image8-c.png
Rodriguez et al 2018b-image9-c.png
Rodriguez et al 2018b-image10-c.png
Rodriguez et al 2018b-image11.png
Figure 4. Defects in Lay-up process: upper left) Gaps; upper right) Missing tow; bottom left) Butt Splice; bottom right) Twist in machine.

The control system has two sensors:

  • Fscan: Sensor technology that uses a specific laser profile scanner to acquire 3D profiles during the AFP process.
  • Lscan: Sensor technology using a reflection model of carbon fibre to measure fibre orientation. 3D information is not provided.
  • In the infusion and curing processes the sensors monitor the temperature, flow rate and extent of the curing. If there is a variation of these parameters outside the acceptable limits, the ZAero system will act by correcting the parameters.
Rodriguez et al 2018b-image12.png
Figure 5. Current working method (orange) and ZAero method (blue).

Porosity can be generated during the infusion and curing processes.

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image13.png
Figure 6. Non destructive test. Example of Porosity.

The sensor used to monitor infusion and curing processes is based on Electrical Time Domain Reflectometry (E-TDR) [2].

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image14-c.png
Figure 7. Schematic Illustration of E-TDR Technology.

3 Materials and Technology

Two different technologies of automated lay-up which have similar needs for inspection will used:

  • Dry Fiber Placement (DFP):

The machine will laminate with 8 tows of uniaxial material (12.7mm of width). Carbon fabric tows are very malleable themselves so as to make them manageable for manufacturing issues, they include binder onto their surfaces.

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image15.png
Figure 8. MTorres Dry Fiber Placement machine (DFP).
Rodriguez et al 2018b-image16-c.png
Figure 9. Uniaxial material.
  • Automated Dry Material Placement (ADMP):

Multiaxial material with a width of 600mm will be placed. The tow curvature is lower in comparison with weave fabrics. The material has better mechanical properties.

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image17.png
Figure 10. Danobat Automated Dry Material Placement machine (ADMP).
Rodriguez et al 2018b-image18.png
Figure 11. Multiaxial material.

The resin that will be used in the infusion and curing processes is a thermoset liquid epoxy resin.

Resin infusion processes techniques undergo both impregnation of the textile reinforcement and curing in the same moulding operation, thus providing cost reductions compared to prepreg technology.

The resin is enabling the parts to keep their final shape via chemical reaction (polymerization). Epoxy is a very versatile resin system, allowing a broad range of properties and processing capabilities.

4 Manufacturing Trials

Three parts will be manufactured. The degree of complexity will be increased in each demonstrator.

4.1 Demonstrator 1

This demonstrator part is mainly focused to test lay-up monitoring.

Defects will be induced during the manufacturing to assess the defect detection capabilities of the inline sensor systems.

A prototype system for inline quality control will be demonstrated.

4.2 Demonstrator 2

Second demo is oriented not only towards lay-up inspection, but also for curing monitoring. The dimensions of Demo 2 will be 1700x1700mm.

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image19.png
Figure 12. Demonstrator 2.

The demo part proposed is based on double curvature in order to identify potential lay-up defects as excessively wide gaps, overlaps, fuzz balls, twisted yarns, or other defects.

An intermediate version of the inline quality support will be demonstrated.

4.3 Demonstrator 3

The third demo part is designed as demo part 2, but including three integrated stringers. These stringers have been defined as 3 “T” shape stringers:

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image20.png
Figure 13. Demonstrator 3.

The integration of the stringers in the demo part is necessary in order to test a real case of a stiffened panel for the infusion process.

A full version of the inline quality support will be demonstrated.

5 Project Plan

The duration of the project is 36 months (October 2016 to October 2019) [() ].

1st Demonstration will be planned to month 12 (October 2017).

2nd Demonstration will be planned to month 24 (October 2018).

3rd Demonstration will be planned to month 36 (October 2019).

6 Acknowledgements

Rodriguez et al 2018b-image21-c.png

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 721362.

7 References

[() ] ZAero-Grant Agreement(http://www.zaero-project.eu).

[2] BUCHMANN, C., FILSINGER, J. and LADSTÄTTER, E.: Investigation of Electrical Time Domain Reflectometry for Infusion and Cure Monitoring in Combination with Electrically Conductive Fibers and Tooling Materials. Composites Part B: Engineering, 94: 389-398 (2016).

Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 29/04/18
Accepted on 29/04/18
Submitted on 29/04/18

Volume 02 - Comunicaciones Matcomp17 (2018), Issue Num. 2 - Aplicaciones y compuestos multifuncionales, 2018
DOI: 10.23967/r.matcomp.2018.04.020
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 4
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?