Latest revision as of 14:56, 30 November 2021

Abstract

The problem raised by the steadily increasing number of failures in ancient town walls has recently attracted much interest. This typology of cultural heritage has always played a critical role in shaping local identities and still holds great potential as a cultural resource but poses substantial challenges in management terms. In fact, multi-disciplinary methodologies for their study and analysis are missing. The MO.M.U. project aims to safeguard ancient town walls in Tuscany (Italy) by introducing an integrated framework for their knowledge, diagnostic, assessment, monitoring and management. The proposed approach employs innovative non-invasive technologies and introduces a multi-hazard risk prioritisation methodology to address preventive conservation and programme interventions.

Full document

References

[1] Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri. Direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri per valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle norme tecniche per le costruzioni. G.U. n. 47 (2011).

[2] Della Torre, S. Italian perspective on the planned preventive conservation of architectural heritage. Frontiers of Architectural Research (2020).

[3] Giuliani, F., De Falco, A., Cutini, V., and Di Sivo, M. A simplified methodology for risk analysis of historic centers: the World Heritage Site of San Gimignano, Italy. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment (2020).

[4] Sevieri, G., Galasso, C., D’Ayala, D., De Jesus, R., Oreta, A., Grio, M. E. D. A., and Ibabao, R. A multi-hazard risk prioritisation framework for cultural heritage assets. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (2020) 20(5): 1391-1391.

[5] Moratti, M., Gaia, F., Martini, S. et al. A methodology for the seismic multilevel assessment of unreinforced masonry church inventories in the Groningen area. Bull Earthquake Eng (2019) 17: 4625–4650.

[6] Romão, X., Paupério, E., and Pereira, N. A framework for the simplified risk analysis of cultural heritage assets. Journal of Cultural Heritage 20 (2016): 696-708.

[7] Andreini, M., De Falco, A., Giresini, L., and Sassu, M. Collapse of the historic city walls of Pistoia (Italy): causes and possible interventions. In: Advances in Civil Structures. Applied Mechanics and Materials (2013) 352: 1389-1392, Trans Tech Publication.

[8] Pratesi, F., Nolesini, T., Bianchini, S., Leva D., Lombardi L., Fanti R., and Casagli N. Early Warning GBInSAR-Based Method for Monitoring Volterra (Tuscany, Italy) City Walls. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2015) 8(4): 1753-1762.

[9] Nowak, M. M., Dziób, K., Ludwisiak, Ł., and Chmiel, J. Mobile GIS applications for environmental field surveys: A state of the art, Global Ecology and Conservation (2020) 23: e01089.

[10] Moreno, M., P. Ortiz, and R. Ortiz. “Vulnerability Study of Earth Walls in Urban Fortifications Using Cause-Effect Matrixes and GIS: the Case of Seville, Carmona and Estepa Defensive Fences.” Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry (2019) 19(3): 119-138.

[11] Birkmann, J., Cardona, O.D., Carreño, M.L. et al. “Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework.” Nat Hazards 67 (2013), 193–211. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013- 0558-5

[12] Bevilacqua, M.G., Caciagli, C. and Salotti, C. Le mura di Pisa: fortificazioni, ammodernamenti e modificazioni dal XII al XIX secolo. Edizioni ETS (2011).