(Created page with "== Abstract == The parish church of “Santa Maria” is considered one of the most important medieval buildings of Arezzo Although the church is attested from 11th century,...") |
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 206665980 to Matracchi et al 2021a) |
(No difference)
|
The parish church of “Santa Maria” is considered one of the most important medieval buildings of Arezzo Although the church is attested from 11th century, it is between the 13th and 14th centuries that reached its current consistency, characterized by the particular façade with small columns on several levels and an imposing bell tower. Later, from the 16th to the 18th century, the church underwent profound transformations, that were almost completely erased by extensive restoration works in the second half of the 19th century. The architectural survey of the parish church of “Santa Maria” was carried out with a phase-shift laser scanner and a digital reflex camera (Z+F 5006h). 189 scans were performed for generating the 3D model of the church: 180 of them with high density and normal quality, lasting 5-6 minutes; the remaining ones with super high density and high quality, lasting 13-14 minutes. Vectorial drawings of plans and sections were then created from the 3D model. Thanks to laser scanner survay of the chuch, it was possible to highlight the singularity of the structure of the basilical body and the transept. The tilt of walls and columns, the variations in the thickness of the walls, the considerable deformations of some arches, the cracks and textures of the wall facing were thus shown. The information obtained attested an architectural structure created by complex construction events that over time have affected this building. The cnstructive singularities involve the medieval genesis of the building, the transformations during the following centuries and the following restoration works. These composite features are specific and common to every ancient building. This peculiar epistemological condition eschews from simplifications and requires deep and complex studies closely linked to the problems of conservation of the structures.
[1] Curzi G., Gli scultori della Pieve, in Arte in terra d’Arezzo, il Medioevo, a cura di Collareta M. e Refice P., Firenze, (2010), pp. 127-135.
[2] Freni G., Spazio liturgico e luoghi sacri nella cattedrale e nella pieve, in Arte in terra d’Arezzo. Il Trecento, a cura di Galli A. e Refice P., Firenze (2005), pp. 218-220.
[3] Mercantini M., La pieve di S. Maria ad Arezzo. Tumultuose vicende di un restauro ottocentesco, Ed. Arezzo (1982), pp. 39-41.
[4] Freni G., Spazio liturgico e luoghi sacri nella cattedrale e nella pieve, in Arte in terra d’Arezzo. Il Trecento, a cura di Galli A. e Refice P., Firenze (2005), p. 220.
[5] Mercantini M., La pieve di S. Maria ad Arezzo. Tumultuose vicende di un restauro ottocentesco, Ed. Arezzo (1982), p. 17.
[6] Mercantini M., La pieve di S. Maria ad Arezzo. Tumultuose vicende di un restauro ottocentesco, Ed. Arezzo (1982), pp. 41-42.
[7] Matracchi P., Symbol, identity, restoration, in Le torri di San Gimignano. Architettura, città restauro/The towers of San Gimignano. Architecture, town, restoration, Firenze, (2019), pp. 33-64.
[8] Bardeschi M. D., La storia tradita. Guida ai monumenti in fedeli d’Italia, in L’architettura cronache e storia, ed. Fabbri, Milano, n. 330, (aprile 1983).
[9] Meschini A., Petrucci E., Rossi D., Sicuranza F., Point cloud-based survey for cultural heritage. An experience of integrated use of range-based and image-based technology for the San Francesco convent in Monterubbiano, in: Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. ISPRS Arch. (2014), pp. 413–420. Grussenmeyer P., Landes T., Boegtle T., Ringle K., Comparison methods of terrestrial laser scanning, photogrammetry and tacheometry data for recording of cultural heritage buildings, in: ISPRS Congr. (2008), pp. 213–218.
[10] Manferdini A.M., Galassi M., Assessments for 3d reconstructions of cultural heritage using digital technologies, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XL-5 W (2013) pp. 167–174. Quattrini R., Malinverni E.S., Clini P., Nespeca R., Orlietti E., From TLS to HBIM, high quality semantically-aware 3D modeling of complex architecture, ISPRS Annals (2015), vol. XL-5/W4, pp. 367-74.
[11] GSA, BIM Guide for 3D Imaging, (2009), p. 53. Retrieved: www.gsa.gov/bim.
[12] Murphy M., Mc Govern E., Pavia S., Historic Building Information Modelling - Adding intelligence to laser and image based surveys of European classical architecture, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and remote Sensing (2013), 76, pp. 89-102. Brookes C., The application of building information modelling (BIM) within a heritage science context, Project n. 7351. Ramboll (2017), pp. 63.
[13]Historic England, 3D Laser Scanning for Heritage: Advice and Guidance on the Use of Laser Scanning in Archaeology and Architecture. Swindon (2018), pp. 113. Historic England, Photogrammetric Application for Cultural Heritage. Guidance for Good Practice. Swidon (2017), pp. 124.
[14] Mercantini M., La pieve di S. Maria ad Arezzo. Tumultuose vicende di un restauro ottocentesco, Ed. Arezzo (1982), p. 50.
[15] Rocchi Coopmans de Yoldy G., La basilica di San Francesco ad Assisi. Prima, durante e dopo il 1997, Firenze, (2002), p. 22.
[16] Bartoli M.T., Biagini C., San Giovanni di Dio, un contributo di conoscenza dal rilievo. In: Diana E., Ghidetti E., Settecento anni di storia. San Giovanni di Dio, un ospedale da non dimenticare, (2012), Polistampa, Firenze, pp. 49-77.
[17] Verdiani G., Peruzzi A., Gualandi M., The Piacenza Cathedral, from the Digital Survey to a Complete Multimedia Documentation. In: Toniolo L., Boriani M., Guidi G., Research for Development Built Heritage: Monitoring Conservation Management. Springer, (2014), pp. 313-21.
Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21
Volume History of construction and building technology, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.278
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?