Latest revision as of 14:42, 30 November 2021

Abstract

In the last two decades, the province of Groningen, located in the North-East of the Netherlands, has been subjected to an increasing number of earthquakes induced by gas extractions. The existing building stock is mainly composed by unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings not conceived to resist seismic loads. The need of reducing the vulnerability of these buildings by means of retrofit interventions, led to the development and adoption of a new guideline (NPR9998:2018). As regards the seismic assessment of URM buildings using nonlinear static analysis, the guideline includes significant differences with respect to Eurocode 8, which is adopted in other European countries. The more significant differences lay in the description of failure mechanisms and constitutive laws of piers and spandrels, inthe identification of limit states and in the calculation of seismic demand. In the last years, the assessment and retrofit in the region has been carried out using software based on an equivalent-frame strategy: among these, the 3Muri software has been widely adopted. The solver of this program is the research software TREMURI. In this work, a new version of the solver adopted by the software 3Muri, complying with the requirements of the new Dutch guideline, was developed; the tool was then validated with simple examples. To illustrate the specificities of the new guideline, the seismic assessment of a building representative of one of the most widely diffused URM building typologies in the area was performed.

Full document

References

[1] Graziotti, F., Penna, A. and Magenes, G. A comprehensive in situ and laboratory testing programme supporting seismic risk analysis of URM buildings subjected to induced earthquakes. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (2019) 17:4575-4599.

[2] Nederlands Normalisatie Instituut (NEN), NPR 9998:2015. Beoordeling van de constructieve veiligheid van een gebouw bij nieuwbouw, verbouw en afkeuren - Grondslagen voor aardbevingsbelastingen: geïnduceerde aardbevingen. Assessment of buildings in case of erection, reconstruction and disapproval - Basic rules for seismic actions: induced earthquakes (2015) (in Dutch).

[3] Nederlands Normalisatie Instituut (NEN), NPR 9998:2017. Beoordeling van de constructieve veiligheid van een gebouw bij nieuwbouw, verbouw en afkeuren - Grondslagen voor aardbevingsbelastingen: geïnduceerde aardbevingen. Assessment of structural safety of buildings in case of erection, reconstruction and disapproval - Basic rules for seismic actions: induced earthquakes (2017) (partially in Dutch).

[4] Nederlands Normalisatie Instituut (NEN), NPR 9998:2018. Beoordeling van de constructieve veiligheid van een gebouw bij nieuwbouw, verbouw enafkeuren - Geïnduceerde aardbevingen - Grondslagen, belastingen en weerstanden. Assessment of structural safety of buildings in case of erection, reconstruction and disapproval - Induced earthquakes - Basis of design, actions and resistances (2018) (in Dutch).

[5] CEN, European Committee for Standardisation, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Design Code EN 1998-1, Brussels, Belgium (2004).

[6] CEN, European Committee for Standardisation, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: Strengthening and repair of buildings, Design Code EN 1998-3, Brussels, Belgium (2005).

[7] Bracchi, S., Rota, M., Penna, A. and Magenes, G. Consideration of modelling uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by equivalent-frame approach. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (2015) 13:3423-3448.

[8] Bracchi, S., Rota, M., Magenes, G. and Penna, A. Seismic assessment of masonry buildings accounting for limited knowledge on materials by Bayesian updating. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (2016) 14:2273-2297.

[9] Cattari, S., Camilletti, D., Lagomarsino, S., Bracchi, S., Rota, M. and Penna, A. Masonry Italian code-conforming buildings. Part 2: nonlinear modelling and time-history analysis.J. Earthq. Eng. (2018) 22:2010-2040.

[10] STADATA, “3Muri User manual. Version: 11.4.0”,

[11] Lagomarsino, S., Penna, A., Galasco, A. and Cattari, S. TREMURI program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Eng. Struct. (2013) 56:1787-1799.

[12] Fajfar, P. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq. Spectra (2000) 16:573–592.

[13] Graziotti, F., Tomassetti, U., Kallioras, S., Penna, A. and Magenes, G. Shaking table test on a full scale URM cavity wall building. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (2017) 15:5329-5364.

[14] http://seismischekrachten.nen.nl/webtool.php.

[15] Kallioras, S., Guerrini, G., Bracchi, S., Penna, A. and Graziotti, F. Displacement demand equations for the non-linear static analysis of short-period masonry structures. 13th North American Masonry Conference, Salt Lake City, USA (2019).