(Created page with "== Abstract == Due to the characteristics of lower strength, anisotropy, heterogeneity and poor ductility, historical masonry structures usually show poor sei...") |
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 728133691 to Wu et al 2021a) |
(No difference)
|
Due to the characteristics of lower strength, anisotropy, heterogeneity and poor ductility, historical masonry structures usually show poor seismic performance. During earthquakes, the damage severity of masonry structural members varies with their real capacity mostly. To avoid waste and save resources, the following retrofitting strategies would be determined in comply with the cost-effective principles corresponding to the severity level of the damaged buildings. The mechanical properties as to the seismic performance of the critical load bearing walls in the damaged buildings could be improved by retrofitting and repairing. However, how to reasonably and effectively estimate the seismic performance of the retrofitted wall with some level of damage could be the most critical and challengeable point. Based on the finite element analyses, simulation method for the seismic performance of retrofitted masonry wall with damage in earthquake is developed in this paper. The stress and strain hysteretic model for the retrofitted wall element is proposed to consider the three stage effects: original damage, retrofitting or repair, and reloading. According to relevant codes and research results, the damage level of components is classified in terms of the loss level of the axial and shear capacity as well as the deformability. Damage patterns, hysteretic relationships among different retrofitting methods in terms of the external single side of reinforced mortar layer and external single side of fibre reinforced lime mortar layer are compared and analyzed. The seismic capacity and hysteretic skeleton curve of retrofitted masonry wall specimens with different damage levels are developed and discussed. The operational cost-effective retrofitting schemes for masonry walls with different damage levels are proposed.
[1] Zhu Bolong, Wu Mingshun, Jiang Zhixian. A study on seismic capacity of brick wall strengthened with cement mortar reinforced with steel mesh
[2] Huang Zhongbang. The study on adopting the cover with cement mortar and the cover with reinforced cement mortar to strengthen brick masonry
[3] Liming, Wang Zhihao. Experimental research on masonry wall with low-strength mortar strengthened with steel-mesh cement mortar
[4] Triantafillou T C, Fardis M N. Strengthening of historic masonry structures with composite materials
[5] Kuzik M D, Elwi A E, Cheng J J R. Cyclic Flexure Tests of Masonry Walls Reinforced with Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Sheets
[6] Jing M, Raongjant W. Experimental Study on Historic Masonry Walls Retrofitted with GFRP Sheets in Different Patterns
[7] Tang Caoming, Luo Rui, Cheng Shaoge, Huang Baodong. Experimental study of seismic performance of low strength masonry walls reinforced with one-side cement mortar splint
[8] R. Faria, J. Oliver, M. Cervera. A strain-based plastic viscous-damage model for massive concrete structures
[9] J. Lee, G. L. Fenves and ASCE. Plastic damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanic, 1998, 124(8): 892-900.
[10] LI Zheng, LI Zhong-xian. A modified elastic damage constitutive model of concrete and its application
[11] Mortezaei A, Kheyroddin A, Ronagh H R. Finite element analysis and seismic rehabilitation of a 1000-year-old heritage listed tall masonry mosque
Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21
Volume Seismic analysis and retrofit, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.177
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?