(Created page with "== Abstract == In this study, the seismic performance of old multi-tiered temples in Nepal has been addressed using three different computational approaches, including...") |
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 290390458 to Pejatovic et al 2021a) |
(No difference)
|
In this study, the seismic performance of old multi-tiered temples in Nepal has been addressed using three different computational approaches, including a) linear elastic; b) nonlinear static; and c) nonlinear dynamic analyses. Also, a sensitivity study was undertaken to understand the influence of wall thickness and height of Nepalese temples on their seismic behavior. Vertical oscillating modes using the elastic response spectrum of the Nepalese Building Code were obtained using linear analysis. Nonlinear static analysis (NLSA) were implemented to obtain the load carrying capacities of different in geometry temples e.g. different thickness of central core walls and number of tiers. Additionally, nonlinear dynamic analysis (NLDA) using the Finite Element Method (FEM) were performed to evaluate the characteristic tensile damage patterns. The results comparatively indicate the weakest zones depending on wall thickness, central core slenderness, opening distribution, box-like confinement, vertical misalignment of walls and so forth. Also, the results of the NLDA affirm high vulnerability of the multi-tiered temples showing extensive cracks at relatively low peak ground accelerations. It is anticipated that outcomes of this study can help practicing engineers to understand how these structures behave when subjected to seismic loads and provide insights towards their strengthening and retrofitting.
[1] M. Betti, A. Borghini, S. Boschi, A. Ciavattone and A. Vignoli, "Comparative Seismic Risk Assessment of Basilica-type Churches," Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22:sup1, 62-95, DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1309602, 2018.
[2] V. Sarhosis, G. Milani, A. Formisano and F. Fabbrocino, "Evaluation of different approaches for the estimation of the seismic vulnerability of masonry towers," Bull Earthquake Eng (2018) 16:1511–1545.
[3] M. Valente and G. Milani, "Effects of Geometrical Features on the Seismic Response of Historical Masonry Towers," Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22:sup1, 2-34, DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1277438, 2018.
[4] A. M. D'Altri, G. Castellazzi and S. Miranda, "Collapse investigation of the Arquata del Tronto medieval fortress after the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence," Journal of Building Engineering 18 (2018) 245–251.
[5] J. Bijaya, R. Wei-Xin, Z. Zhou-Hong and M. Prem Nath, "Dynamic and seismic performance of old multi-tiered temples in Nepal," Engineering Structures 25 (2003) 1827–1839, 11 August 2003.
[6] A. Arce, P. Awal and A. Tamrakar, "Structural analysis and strengthening proposals for the Gopinath temple in Kathamndu Durbar Square," January 2018.
[7] D. Sonda, D. Bothara, C. Chesi, V. Sumini and e. al, "ANALYSIS OF THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF A STRENGTHENED PAGODA TEMPLE DURING GORKHA EARTHQUAKE," in 16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017, Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017.
[8] P. Grassl, D. Xenos, U. Nystrom, R. Rempling and K. Gylltoft, "CDPM2: A damage- plasticity approach to modelling the failure of concrete," 26 Jul 2013.
[9] G. Milani and M. Valente, "Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: Non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches," Engineering Failure Analysis 54 (2015) 13–56, 31 March 2015.
[10] " Direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri - Valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle Norme techice per le construzioni di cui al D.M. 14/01/2018," p. 29, 9 Febbraio 2011.
Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21
Volume Seismic analysis and retrofit, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.173
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?