Latest revision as of 14:32, 30 November 2021

Abstract

The present paper aims at assessing the shape irregularities influence on the collapse conditions of masonry arches subjected to vertical point force. Surveys campaigns on cultural Heritage buildings often reveal masonry elements with irregular shapes. In order to accurately predict their actual behavior the presence of such features cannot be neglected. The reasons for these non-canonical shapes are manifold e.g. the evolution of degradation processes and the constructive laws. As a first analysis attempt, the geometrical uncertainties tied to the building work criteria are taken into account. A random parametric model is proposed to generate two-dimensional geometry of irregular polycentric arches. Monte Carlo simulations allows estimating the probabilistic density function of the collapse load multiplier evaluated by means of the implemented limit analysis method. The outcomes referred to the masonry arch with nominal geometry are compared to those obtained for the random polycentric arch, highlighting the extent of the load-bearing capacity reduction due to presence of such shape irregularities.

Full document

References

[1] Giordano, E., Clementi, F., Nespeca, A. and Lenci, S. Damage assessment by numerical modeling of sant'agostino's sanctuary in offida during the central italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. Frontiers in Built Environment (2019) 4(7):87.

[2] Cavalagli, N., Kita, A., Castaldo, V.L., Pisello, A.L. and Ubertini, F. Hierarchical environmental risk mapping of material degradation in historic masonry buildings: An integrated approach considering climate change and structural damage. Construction and Building Materials (2019) 215:998-1014.

[3] Grillanda, N., Chiozzi, A., Bondi, F., Tralli, A., Manconi, F., Stochino, F. and Cazzani, A. Numerical insights on the structural assessment of historical masonry stellar vaults: the case of Santa Maria del Monte in Cagliari. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics (2019) in press, DOI: 10.1007/s00161-019-00752-8.

[4] Orlando, M., Betti, M. and Spinelli, P. Assessment of structural behaviour and seismic retrofitting for an Italian monumental masonry building. Journal of Building Engineering (2020) 29:101115.

[5] Cavalagli, N. and Gusella, V. Structural investigation of 18th-century ogival masonry domes: From Carlo Fontana to Bernardo Vittone. International Journal of Architectural Heritage (2015) 9(3):265-276.

[6] Galassi, S. and Tempesta, G. The Matlab code of the method based on the Full Range Factor for assessing the safety of masonry arches. MethodsX (2019) 6:1521-1542.

[7] Como, M., Di Carlo, F. and Coccia, S. Dynamic response of rocking cracked masonry walls. Meccanica (2019) 54(3):381-398.

[8] Brandonisio, G., Angelillo, M. and De Luca, A. Seismic capacity of buttressed masonry arches. Engineering Structures (2020) 215:110661.

[9] Nodargi, N.A. and Bisegna, P. Thrust line analysis revisited and applied to optimization of masonry arches. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences (2020) 179:105690.

[10] Cocchetti, G. and Rizzi, E. Static Upper/Lower Thrust and Kinematic Work Balance Stationarity for Least-Thickness Circular Masonry Arch Optimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications (2020) 187(3):707-757.

[11] Fraddosio, A., Lepore, N. and Piccioni, M.D. Thrust Surface Method: An innovative approach for the three-dimensional lower bound Limit Analysis of masonry vaults. Engineering Structures (2020) 202:109846.

[12] Grillanda, N., Chiozzi, A., Milani, G. and Tralli, A. Efficient meta-heuristic mesh adaptation strategies for NURBS upper–bound limit analysis of curved three-dimensional masonry structures. Computers and Structures (2020) 236:106271.

[13] Bayraktar, A. and Hökelekli, E. Nonlinear soil deformability effects on the seismic damage mechanisms of brick and stone masonry arch bridges. International Journal of Damage Mechanics (2020) in press, DOI: 10.1177/1056789520974423.

[14] Zampieri, P. Horizontal capacity of single-span masonry bridges with intrados FRCM strengthening. Composite Structures (2020) 244:112238.

[15] Rovero, L., Galassi, S. and Misseri, G. Experimental and analytical investigation of bond behavior in glass fiber-reinforced composites based on gypsum and cement matrices. Composites Part B: Engineering (2020) 194:108051.

[16] Bayraktar, A. and Hökelekli, E. Seismic Performances of Different Spandrel Wall Strengthening Techniques in Masonry Arch Bridges. International Journal of Architectural Heritage (2020) in press, DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2020.1719234.

[17] Gusella, V. and Liberotti, R. Seismic Vulnerability of Sub-Structures: Vanvitelli’s Modulus in Murena Palace. Buildings (2020) 10(9):164.

[18] Lourenço, P.B., Oliveira, D.V., Leite, J.C., Ingham J.M., Modena, C. and da Porto, F. Simplified indexes for the seismic assessment of masonry buildings: International database and validation. Engineering Failure Analysis (2013) 34:508-605.

[19] Tempesta, G. and Galassi S. Safety evaluation of masonry arches. a numerical procedure based on the thrust line closest to the geometrical axis. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences (2019) 155:206-221.

[20] Cazzani, A., Malagù, M. and Turco, E. Isogeometric analysis: a powerful numerical tool for the elastic analysis of historical masonry arches. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics (2016) 28(1-2):139-156.

[21] Zampieri, P., Zanini, M., Faleschini, F. Seismic capacity of masonry arches with irregular abutments and arch thickness. Construction and Building Materials (2019) 201:786–806.

[22] Pepi, C., Cavalagli, N., Gusella, V., and Gioffrè, M. An integrated approach for the numerical modeling of severely damaged historic structures: Application to a masonry bridge. Advances in Engineering Software (2021) 151:102935.

[23] Cavalagli, N., Gusella, V. and Severini, L. The safety of masonry arches with uncertain geometry. Computers and Structures (2017) 188:17-31.

[24] Zampieri, P., Cavalagli, N., Gusella, V. and Pellegrino, C. Collapse displacements of masonry arch with geometrical uncertainties on spreading supports. Computers and Structures (2018) 208:118-129.

[25] Severini, L., Cavalagli, N., DeJong, M. and Gusella, V. Dynamic response of masonry arch with geometrical irregularities subjected to a pulse-type ground motion. Nonlinear Dynamics (2018) 91(1):609-624.

[26] Gusella, V. Geometrical uncertainty in mechanics and random curves in space. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics (2020) 62:103102.

[27] Cavalagli, N., Gusella, V. and Liberotti, R. Effect of Shape Uncertainties on the Collapse Condition of the Circular Masonry Arch. In: B. Abali and I. Giorgio (Eds.): Developments and Novel Approaches in Nonlinear Solid Body Mechanics. Advanced Structured Materials, Springer, Cham 130 (2020), pp. 455-467.

[28] Cavalagli, N., Gusella, V. and Liberotti, R. The Role of Shape Irregularities on the Lateral Loads Bearing Capacity of Circular Masonry Arches. In: A. Carcaterra et al. (Eds.): Proceedings of XXIV AIMETA Conference 2019. AIMETA 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer Cham (2020), pp. 2069-2081.

[29] Heyman, J. (1969) The safety of masonry arches. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences (1969) 11(4):363-382.