Latest revision as of 14:32, 30 November 2021

Abstract

The current Italian Building Code provides tables with standard values of the mechanical characteristics of existing masonry. These tables refer to specific typologies, as described, according to masonry texture. As experience suggests, the way in which the masonry is built up could really affect its structural behaviour, both in terms of mechanical properties and failure mechanisms. Furthermore, the code entrusts each Region to improve and better define these mechanical characteristics, specifically in areas where they could be regarded as homogeneous, in order to improve definitions of the quality, the behaviour and the mechanical properties with a higher degree of precision and knowledge. Valtellina, located in the north of the Lombardy region and in the middle of the Alps, can be regarded as a homogeneous area because of its specific masonry, built up with hard rock stones and weak lime mortar. The available in–situ experimental data about this masonry typology, achieved through MDTs and NDTs, was collected, implemented and improved with additional tests to identify the relevant mechanical properties. This was aimed to classify and structurally identify this specific regional masonry typology, never analysed before.

Full document

References

[1] Ministero Infrastrutture e Trasporti. (2019). Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’«Aggiornamento delle "Norme tecniche per le costruzioni"» (Guidelines for the Application of Italian Building Code for Constructions)

[2] Bätzing Werner (2003). Die Alpen – Geschichte und Zukunft einer europäischen Kulturlandschaft. Verlag C.H. Beck, München 2003

[3] Mannoni, T. (1997). Il problema complesso delle murature storiche in pietra, in Archeologia dell’architettura, numero II, Firenze: All’insegna del giglio.

[4] Foppoli, D. (2019). Le Costruzioni in Pietra a Secco nel Paesaggio Culturale Valtellinese. Tirano, Notiziario Istituto Archeologico Valtellinese n. 17, Sondrio 2019.

[5] Bretto, G. (2018). L'esperienza Ossolana ed il contesto internazionale. Tecnologia e lessico della pietra a secco. In Paesaggi Terrazzati: Scelte per il Futuro (pp. 317-326). Regione del Veneto.

[6] Armanasco A., Foppoli, D. (2016). Diagnostic tests vs structural models: the utility of the comparision. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on non-destructive investigation for the diagnostic and conservation of cultural heritage (Art’14) Madrid

[7] Ministero Infrastrutture e Trasporti. (2011). Linee Guida per la valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle norme tecniche (Guidelines for the Evaluation and Reduction of seismic Hazard for Cultural Heritage Buildings)

[8] Armanasco A., Foppoli D. (2014), Diagnostic tests vs structural models: the utility of the comparison, Proceedings of 11th International conference on non-destructive investigations and microanalysis for the diagnostics and conservation of cultural and environmental heritage (Art’14). Madrid

[9] Avila L., Vasconcelos G., Lourenço P. B. (2018), Experimental seismic performance assessment of asymmetric masonry buildings, Engineering Structures, Volume 155, pp. 298-314

[10] Binda L., Cantini L., Cardani G., Saisi A., Tiraboschi C. (2007) Use of Flat-Jack and sonic tests for the qualification of historic masonry. In: 10th North American masonry conference. St. Luis, Missouri, USA

[11] Podestà s., Scandolo L., Brignola A. (2013). Prove soniche per la caratterizzazione della monoliticità trasversale di pannelli murari. ReLUIS-DPC 2010 2013. ReLUIS

[12] Jurina, L. (2007). La caratterizzazione meccanica delle murature parte prima: prove penetrometriche. Politecnico di Milano – Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale.