Latest revision as of 14:29, 30 November 2021

Abstract

A majority of the residential building stock in Groningen (The Netherlands), which has been lately exposed to low intensity ground motions due to gas extraction, consists of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures not originally designed to withstand earthquakes. Amongst them, the terraced house building typology proved to be particularly vulnerable towards horizontal actions. Experimental results from a recently performed shake-table test on a full-scale terraced house prototype, characterised by the presence of a timber retrofitting system, seem to indicate that the dynamic response of these structures might be consistently improved through the employment of such a cost-effective light retrofitting solution. In this work, an advanced discontinuum-based model, implemented in the framework of the Applied Element Method (AEM), is developed to extend experimental results and to numerically investigate the influence of a number of additional timber retrofit layouts, characterised by different geometrical configurations, on the building behaviour. Each timber component was explicitly represented in the AEM models to represent the possible interaction among URM walls and the retrofitting system. First, the proposed modelling strategy is validated against experimental tests on both non-retrofitted and retrofitted URM panels subjected to cyclic shear compression loading. Then, calibrated mechanical parameters were directly implemented in the full-scale building model. Given the good agreement between numerical and experimental outcomes in terms of both damage evolution and hysteretic response, a comprehensive parametric study was undertaken. Numerical evidence seems to suggest that the employment of different retrofit layouts may have a significant influence on the dynamic behaviour of the selected building typology.

Full document

References

[1] Meguro, K. and Tagel-Din, H. Applied element method for structural analysis: Theory and application for linear materials. Struct. Eng. Earthq. Eng. (2000) 17:21s-35s.

[2] Malomo, D., Pinho, R. and Penna, A. Applied Element Modelling of the Dynamic Response of a Full-Scale Clay Brick Masonry Building Specimen with Flexible Diaphragms. Int. J. Archit. Herit. (2019) https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1616004.

[3] Karbassi, A. and Nollet, M.J. Performance-based seismic vulnerability evaluation of masonry buildings using applied element method in a nonlinear dynamic-based analytical procedure. Earthq. Spectra (2013) 29:399–426.

[4] Van Elk, J.F., Bourne, S.J., Oates, S.J., Bommer, J., Pinho, R. and Crowley, H. A probabilistic model to evaluate options for mitigating induced seismic risk. Earthq. Spectra (2019) 35:537–64.

[5] Miglietta, M., Damiani, N., Guerrini, G. and Graziotti, F. Full-scale shake-table tests on two full-scale unreinforced masonry cavity-wall buildings: effect of an innovative timber retrofit system. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (to be submitted 2020).

[6] Graziotti, F., Penna, A. and Magenes G. A comprehensive in situ and laboratory testing programme supporting seismic risk analysis of URM buildings subjected to induced earthquakes. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (2019) 17:4575–99.

[7] Damiani, N., Miglietta, M., Mazzella, L., Grottoli, L., Guerrini, G. and Graziotti, F. Full-scale shaking table test on a Dutch URM cavity-wall terraced-house end unit – A retrofit solution with strong-backs and OSB boards – EUC-BUILD-7. EUCENTRE Foundation, Pavia, Italy, Research report EUC052/2019U (2019).

[8] Malomo, D., Pinho, R. and Penna, A. Using the applied element method for modelling calcium silicate brick masonry subjected to in-plane cyclic loading. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. (2018) 47:1610–30.

[9] Malomo, D., Comini, P., Pinho, R. and Penna A. The Applied Element Method and the modelling of both in-plane and out-of-plane response of URM walls. 16th Eur. Conf. Earthq. Eng., Thessaloniki, Greece (2018).

[10] Malomo, D., Morandini, C., Penna, A., Crowley, H. and Pinho, R. Impact of ground floor openings percentage on the dynamic response of URM cavity-wall structures. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (to be submitted 2020)

[11] Ravenshorst, G.J.P. and Mirra, M. Test report on cyclic behaviour of replicated timber diaphragms representing a detached house. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. Report number C31B67WP4-7, version 1, 30 December 2017 (2017).

[12] Morandini, C., Malomo, D., Pinho, R. and Penna, A. Simulation of shake table test on full-scale masonry building with timber retrofit using the applied element method. Eng. Struct. (to be submitted 2020)

[13] Guerrini, G., Damiani, N., Miglietta, M. and Graziotti, F. Cyclic response of masonry retrofitted with timber frames and boards. Struct. Build. (In press 2020) DOI: 10.1680/jstbu.19.00134