(Created page with "== Abstract == Current massive data capture techniques (MDCT), such as terrestrial laser scanning and digital photogrammetry, have become widespread during the last decade, a...") |
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 448820939 to Costa-Jover et al 2021a) |
(No difference)
|
Current massive data capture techniques (MDCT), such as terrestrial laser scanning and digital photogrammetry, have become widespread during the last decade, and raises the possibility of developing new assessment methodologies based on the 3D documentation. The paper exposes de results of using simple, non-invasive procedures for the assessment of the shape of a masonry building from a point clouds registered with a terrestrial laser scanner. The case study selected is the church of Sant Miquel of Batea (eighteenth century), located in the province of Tarragona (Spain). The methodology used combines 2D and 3D processes for assessment of the geometry. The results of the investigation have confirmed the good condition of the building. It presents dimensional variations, most of which can be related to the construction process, while some displacements identified provide information about the accommodation process of the masonry structure.
[1] M. Korumaz et al., “An integrated Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS), Deviation Analysis (DA) and Finite Element (FE) approach for health assessment of historical structures. A minaret case study,” Eng. Struct., vol. 153, no. October, pp. 224–238, 2017.
[2] L. J. Sánchez-Aparicio, A. Villarino, J. García-Gago, and D. González-Aguilera, “Non contact photogrammetric methodology to evaluate the structural health of historical constructions,” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. andSpatial Inf. Sci., vol. 40, no. 5W4, pp. 331–338, 2015.
[3] R. Kadobayashi, N. Kochi, H. Otani, and R. Furukawa, “Comparison and evaluation of laser scanning and photogrammetry and their combined use for digital recording of cultural heritage,” Int. Arch. Photogramm., 2004.
[4] P. Grussenmeyer, T. Landes, T. Voegtle, and K. Ringle, “Comparison methods of terrestrial laser scanning , photogrammetry and tacheometry data for recording of cultural heritage buildings,” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., vol. 37 (B5), pp. 213–218, 2008.
[5] S. Martínez, J. Ortiz, M. L. Gil, and M. T. Rego, “Recording Complex Structures Using Close Range Photogrammetry: The Cathedral of Santiago De Compostela,” Photogramm. Rec., vol. 28, no. 144, pp. 375–395, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1111/phor.12040.
[6] F. Fassi, C. Achille, and L. Fregonese, “Surveying and modelling the main spire of Milan Cathedral using multiple data sources,” Photogramm. Rec., vol. 26, no. 136, pp. 462–487, Dec. 2011.
[7] J. Alanyà, Sant Miquel de Batea. La catedral de Terra Alta. Tortosa: Imprenta Querol, SL, 2019.
[8] A. Costa-Jover, J. Lluis i Ginovart, S. Coll-Pla, and M. López Piquer, “Using the terrestrial laser scanner and simple methodologies for geometrically assessing complex masonry vaults,” J. Cult. Herit., 2018.
[9] E. Quagliarini, P. Clini, and M. Ripanti, “Fast, low cost and safe methodology for the assessment of the state of conservation of historical buildings from 3D laser scanning: The case study of Santa Maria in Portonovo (Italy),” J. Cult. Herit., 2016
[10] E. Bonali, A. Pesci, G. Casula, and E. Boschi, “Deformation of Ancient Buildings inferred by Terrestrial Laser Scanning methodology: the Cantalovo church case study (Northern Italy)*,” Archaeometry, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 703–716, Aug. 2014.
Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21
Volume Interdisciplinary projects and case studies, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.117
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?